and the environmental finding in the ceqa document. pg&e with the port, peer 39 and while in october of 2021, and again just this past may 2022. can discuss the plan in september 2021 meeting october and december meetings. i want to point out that as a result of stakeholder feedback on concerns about and impacts from proposal to rehandle dredge materials down at the property. pg&e withdrew the so that portion of work is no longer part of our project. it's no longer part of the project that we're talking about today. now pursuing setting up their construction staging and handling operation. requires plans and sediments gas plan operation located beneath the bay floor in the off-shore areas shown on this map from peer 39 to peer 43 and a half. the sediment pose potential hazards to fish and other marine organisms and bay ecology. the sediments did not pose hazards to humans. sxwh institutional controls as shown on this issue, remediation will be performed in 5 areas less i go natured area 5, 2, and 3, based on the 2020 estimate, the tota

eir and is adequately described in the phase 1 eir for purposes of the environment, quality act or ceqa and adopted final many and discussion in action resolution number 25-22. director he [indiscernible] >> this is an important project at the hunters point project area. lot 56 as it's known in the project documents, 73 unit rent alfordable housing. we're hoping to get your approval today on this will. this is going to be developed by mercy housing and the san francisco housing development corporation. this item will be presented by elizabeth colemello our housing manager. >> thank you. good afternoon. chair bus bustos, vice chair and commissioner scott. i'm elizabeth kohl middleo and agenda a-c regarding an afford being housing project to be biltd in hunters point shipyard phase 1. next slide, please. today's development dispeem i are seeking authorization to enter into a first amended exclusive associations agreement or e flrks a and amended option to ground lease and amended and restated loan agreement providing up to 36.25 million in funding and a long term ground lease to facilitat

to affirm the planning ceqa determination and to adopt other wreck sit findings.o the sale agreement as stated. >> thank you, so we'll take the same item same call this resolution adopted unanimously. madam clerk, please call item 35. >> clerk: item 35 resolution to approve the issuance in sale of revenue by the california enterprise development authority in an amount not to exceed 7.5 million. to be owned and operated by the progress foundation the california nonprofit benefit corporation. >> thank you, madam clerk, i don't see anybody on the roster so we'll take it--this a adopted unanimously. >> clerk: item number 36, tax exempt obligation by the development authority for 40 million to finance or refinance various to be owned or operated by college of the arts. >> thank you, i don't see anyone on the roster so we'll take the same call some roster, this adopted unanimously. item resolution to retro active authorize public works to accept and expand 42 million dollars caltrans. in support of the south of mashlgt street nursery project through june 30th, 2023 and

add upon minster ceqa. excuse me. we'll have don't have their scope yet of work. we are hope to get that instead next couple weeks and talk how this will work. we will schedule a time to come talk to you when we get that scope about that. as well as comments real received. hopeful low we are back with a formal presentation in september to update you on this. that's all i have. thanks. >> i have a question. in terms of the hc the comments and you mentioned that hcd electric to impose entitlements. we'll hear it more in terms of we had all the discussions about entitlements approved but not being built. that is also part of the hc the comments? >> i mean i think they are looking at the -- city's entitlement process. you know >> through permitting and building permits issued. i don't believe they will look at why a project experience may not move forward witness hay get entitlements. it it is strict low the city's process. >> okay. they are looking beyond the planning entitlements to actual pulling and building permits. >> okay. >> thank you. we can move on to item 1

eir and is adequately described in the phase 1 eir for purposes of the environment, quality act or ceqa and adopted final many and discussion in action resolution number 25-22. director he [indiscernible] >> this is an important project at the hunters point project area. lot 56 as it's known in the project documents, 73 unit rent alfordable housing. we're hoping to get your approval today on this will. this is going to be developed by mercy housing and the san francisco housing development corporation. this item will be presented by elizabeth colemello our housing manager. >> thank you. good afternoon. chair bus bustos, vice chair and commissioner scott. i'm elizabeth kohl middleo and agenda a-c regarding an afford being housing project to be biltd in hunters point shipyard phase 1. next slide, please. today's development dispeem i are seeking authorization to enter into a first amended exclusive associations agreement or e flrks a and amended option to ground lease and amended and restated loan agreement providing up to 36.25 million in funding and a long term ground lease to facilitat

applications required by ceqa once the board approved mar's study. staff will apply for a permit. during the pilot study staff and mta collect information like usage data and public feedback. the great highway's long-term future. travellers may have noticed change in golden gate park on minuted rec and park and mta opened a new traffic flow pattern between chain of lakes and sunset. this new configuration is to give vehicles an option to exit east lane on mlk and sunset boulevard. concrete barriers were installod mlk for a separated space for people on foot or bike. the past couple of days add additional barriers and roadway mark torse protect pedestrians and cyclists and create traffic flow for all this is a work in progress and do our best to balance public safety need in this space. [speaking fast]. rec and park implemented new measures to more effectively surprise projects on properties. this mont the controller's office found reshg and park did not over see the ports smith parking garage project managed by port smith parking co operation. it exceeded the budget and not comple

is inside of a national historic district so the change that would happen to that is still subject ceqa and would therefore be in keeping with national standards. so, i just wanted to, as i develop this, it was not an ask of the building owners but it was an offer to restrict it to just the significant areas that were most related to the event. >> okay. yeah. i did assume that the building was a contributor to the district, so that would have some protections but just thought it would be good to put it out there and then, i also have a question about the plaque. you know, i've been to this site many times and i have to say that the plaques are, you know, understated and i see that they're going to be salvaged for reinstallation and a new location but i didn't find where that location is and i just want to make the plug for interpretation of this event and the significance of this place. how can we tell the story of what happened here, why this place is important? you know, in addition to a couple of plaques. i think that it warrants a much greater amount of information for the public. >

add upon minster ceqa. excuse me. we'll have don't have their scope yet of work. we are hope to get that instead next couple weeks and talk how this will work. we will schedule a time to come talk to you when we get that scope about that. as well as comments real received. hopeful low we are back with a formal presentation in september to update you on this. that's all i have. thanks. >> i have a question. in terms of the hc the comments and you mentioned that hcd electric to impose entitlements. we'll hear it more in terms of we had all the discussions about entitlements approved but not being built. that is also part of the hc the comments? >> i mean i think they are looking at the -- city's entitlement process. you know >> through permitting and building permits issued. i don't believe they will look at why a project experience may not move forward witness hay get entitlements. it it is strict low the city's process. >> okay. they are looking beyond the planning entitlements to actual pulling and building permits. >> okay. >> thank you. we can move on to item 1

trees and hearings on permits, so that will continue to be shared interoffice mail, ada placement, ceqa, we have a in-house staff that daenvironmental review and that is continued to be provided to both departments and fleet services. we all see the fleet from public works so there is management and oversight of that. in the hearings i will provide detailed overviewf the budget but i wanted to give a quick snapshot what the budget looks like. congratulations you have chosen to be commissioners for one of the most complicated budgets ing the sitdy and i'm bias saying that but think is very true. if you look at the budget you get a snapshot it is roughly fiscal year 22-23 about $447 million for the two departments. what we had to do this year for the first time ever was create a budget that split mid-year so in the first quarter of fiscal year 23, there is combined public works budget that is both public works and sanitation and streets and create a budget for the latter 2/3 of the year for sanitation and streets and you see the full split in fiscal year 23-24 so that is what we are showi