cu authorization. i did receive a request to remove item five from consent. we hear that at the end of today's agenda? >> yes. >> very good. americans that leaves us with item 6 on consent a member would like to request to have this removed from scene. come forward or if you are call nothing press star 3. move to approve item 6 >> thank you, commissioners on that motion to approve item 6 on scene commissioner ruiz. >> aye >> commissioner diamond. >> aye. >> commissioner imperial. >> aye. >> commissioner koppel. >> aye >> moore. >> that passed 5-zero. >> microphone. >> under commission matters item 7 adoption of draft minutes for july 21 and 8 eighth. this is your opportunity to address on the minutes. come forward or press star 3. no questions to speak from the public, public comment on minutes is closed and they are before you. commissioners. >> adopt the minutes. >> second. >> thank you. commissioners. on that motion to adopt the minutes commissioner ruiz. >> aye. >> commissioner diamond. >> aye. >>

cu authorization. commissioners this is chris went joined us during the pandemic in november. 2021 a preservation planner and southeast quadrant. previously he worked for cultural resource firm michael baker served an a preservation planner. over 12 years experience in education and nonprofit work. graduated from sa nomea state in 2016. welcome, chris. >> thank you. good afternoon crips flint department staff. the item is a request for cu authorization for the property 140, second street a category one belling in the new montgomery conversation district designated article 11 of the code and register list the second and howard historic district. of the property is c30 zoning district. the property improved a sick story building construct in the 1907 in italian style. to install a new at&t and anthem wireless consistentsing of the following. new roof top platform. principle antennas in 24 aaron covers. 2 remote radio units. one gpsn 10asm one walk up cabinet. panels, boxes and cables and utility runs fro

a cu authorization. i did receive a request to remove item five from consent. we hear that at the end of today's agenda? >> yes. >> very good. americans that leaves us with item 6 on consent a member would like to request to have this removed from scene. come forward or if you are call nothing press star 3. move to approve item 6 >> thank you, commissioners on that motion to approve item 6 on scene commissioner ruiz. >> aye >> commissioner diamond. >> aye. >> commissioner imperial. >> aye. >> commissioner koppel. >> aye >> moore. >> that passed 5-zero. >> microphone. >> under commission matters item 7 adoption of draft minutes for july 21 and 8 eighth. this is your opportunity to address on the minutes. come forward or press star 3. no questions to speak from the public, public comment on minutes is closed and they are before you. commissioners. >> adopt the minutes. >> second. >> thank you. commissioners. on that motion to adopt the minutes commissioner ruiz. >> aye. >> commissioner diamond. >> aye. >> commissioner imperial. >> aye >> commissioner koppel. >> a

the project sponsor could apply to remove the unauthorized unit through cu authorization with the criteria found it is financial low infeasible to do so. >> one of the other concern system tht ad u or udu -- that has been applied for is not code compliant. bedrooms the front bedroom has there is not an understanding of the building code by this applicant. and it is unfortunate a professional was not used in the creation of the design. it does not meet the upon stooshsd of care. but i understand the planning department and staff is in the here to vet building code. but in this case it is more severe issue given the number of units and appalling to me manage that had code issues continues to be resubmitted without correction. this includes the front gate. my occurrence are where we are asked to approve a building that when it ultimate low guess through the sausage factory and dbi it becomes something different. we are struggling with too many issues given the hundreds of comments the minimum i expect them what is in front of us is something that meets in a way to minimum expectations. no aud

butus i b hus yo ialnitialct rnctoo .th dhat that tsehe cssifiedd cu mesmesedooucleuc s, tylsayayt t merit garland personally authorizedk the search warrant and we knew that. have you ever, though, in a general sense, have you ever had concerns in the past about former president donald trump mishandling classified information? >> no in fact i was in the oval office with him having discussions about nuclear weapon s and i can tell you that the president wouldn't have in the oval office classified materials with respect to nuclear weapons and also there's different levels of classification. there are things the department of defense will tell you or classify that you can find on your phone right now while you're watching this broadcast, so the thing we're looking for from the attorney general is what rises to the level of an immediate national security concern that you would raid his home? and that would have to be the type of stuff that's actually done in the situation room and the president isn't going to have continuous access to this. it's unlikely they packed up boxes from the situation room and took those off to ma