tactical or strategic nuclear weapons on strategic nuclear weapons have just been declared by dmitry medveevf russia's military doctrine, which we have discussed with you before and which consists in escalating the conflict for the purpose of de-escalation, that is, to convince the opponent of the readiness to resort to such unheard- of violence that will frighten the enemy and force him give up this is what putin is doing now, the sky is free no, he is fine and that in the case of using nuclear weapons there is a risk that he will lose absolutely everything, including his own life, and nothing worries him so much as his own well-being the current narratives are aimed exclusively at intimidation, i am not optimistic because this is a terrible war that needs to be ended as soon as possible, yes, putin wants to continue, but he will not be able to hold out for long, the release of more than 200 fighters, many of whom are famous azov soldiers, are soldiers whose lives everyone experienced and now they want to thank god . yes, i understand you, mr. ambassadors. on the other hand , our mutual acq

use tactical or strategic nuclear weapons in one way or another about strategic nuclear weapons dmitry medveevas just stated that this is true and that it is part of the military the doctrine of russia, which we have already discussed with you earlier and which consists in escalating the conflict for the purpose of de-escalation , that is, to convince the opponent that he is ready to resort to such unheard-of violence that frightens the enemy and will force him to surrender. this is what putin is doing now, the sky is free. no, he is fine. and that in the case of using nuclear weapons, there is a risk that he will end up with absolutely everything, including his own life, and nothing worries him so much as his own well-being. his current rhetoric is aimed exclusively at i am not optimistic about intimidation, because this is a terrible war that needs to be ended as soon as possible. yes, putin wants to continue , but he will not be able to hold out for long. the release of more than 200 soldiers, many of what a famous azov people, these are soldiers whose lives were suffered by everyone and no

well, dmitry medveev, deputy secretary of the national security council, former president, prime ministeria, reacted to these limits and to oil and gas in such a frivolous way that he wrote for the eu it's time to introduce a ceiling of the prices for pipeline gas from russia, the aunty of the state fund said, how did lyyan write, what will it be like with the bear, as with oil, russian gas in europe simply will not be, he wrote, well, i’m not talking about this sexism and others. no less than form, they can simply block the supply of gas and oil in the event of the introduction of a limit. well, look, this will be a difficult process because, on the one hand, in russia and in the gazprom well, somehow, it is technically possible for the exporter to reduce oil production, that is, gas production. and in the movement , oil production was technically reduced yes , but again, everyone's cushion is different. that is, what is the maximum volume, that is, before we saw the fact that during the crisis, gazprom. maybe , russia as a whole, but gazprom repeats the key exporter, they can reduce pro