my understanding from what i've read of the gsa they pack all the boxes okay.y boxes? >> president trump: no, they work together with people in the white house. i don't know how you would classify them, but gsa was involved they are fantastic people. and they pack them and not only that they brought them in along with people in the white house. i don't know who they are but a are a lot of people in the white house. they pack them up, but not clothing massive amounts of pictures they take so many pictures every day in the give you copies of all the stuff. and it's boxes of boxes of pictures. newspaper articles, tremendous even kitchen things. you've terminus amounts of different items. much clothing. shirts, and everything. a sports gear. all the stuff that just to show you their many pictures of the stuff standing on the sidewalk outside on the basement. not in the basement you're standing outside during a silly joke but decided not to so to be a very nice person. sean, standing outside in a way to be put by the gsa i assume into a truck and brought down to pal

gsa will make contact with us and we will go with gsa and the agency and will do preleaseded assessment. this is to go out and look at gsa has hear some offerings from some leases in the city. you've got these many people, this much square footage come unity this kind of space and then we will go out and look at it and then we will narrow that down to thee top three and then gsa will work with the agency to establish the lease. we will workll with the agency o establish the necessary level of protection for that facility. we want to get in their first before they move in. let's get this established before people are here. let's get the projects in place. in a number of instances that the agency says i can't afford to do 20 cameras around my building, and if you can't do that can we get a lease cameras at every entrance? song we can see who's coming in the building, record some type of nefarious activity that goes on there. let's come up with something. let's don't leave it, we can't afford not to do anything. let's try to do something that makes sense that helps us secure the facility.

bringet together with gsa.you have to understand they bring it down. >> but ngara and you talkat i and you work and you negotiate. 19 i mean, they did it. it's not that old. i think in the nineteen seventies exactly.r for this.y nice dis and we were having very nicecuss discussion. no problem. and then all of a sudden we got hit very harbyd by the fbi. >> let's backtrack a little in t january of this year, the national archives record administration, i guessnt they had been negotiating or they came and got fifteen boxesg . my understanding is that they sent you a letter thanking you and your team fordent trump their cooperation. actually thanked us . they thanked youthey d us. okay, and then so at that tha point, what wase your involvement in the process? >> did you have not much pr >> presi evidencedent involvement other n we had boxes? and again, many of these boxes ,other things, you know, many,mv many newspapers literally massive amounts of newspapers and pictures. >> but there were a lot of t boxes for a l

does fps offer recommendations prior to gsa approving or suggesting a location towards agency? >> thank you ranking member. let's say in agency decides they want to move to a new location in dallas. they will make contact with us and we will go with the agency. this is to look and here are some offerings from less these entities. you have these many people on this much where footage in this space and then we'll go out and look at it and we will nail that down to the top three and gsa will work or the agency to establish the east and we will work to establish the necessary level of protection. we want to get in there first before they move in. to get established before people are here to get the project in place. and a number of businesses is the agencies that i can afford to do 20 cameras around my building so can we do cameras at every angle? we can see who's coming in the building and report the security that goes on there. let's come up with something. let's not leave it where you can afford anything but try to do something that makes sense to help the facility. >> to be cle

it won't come through gsa. such an approach is now resulted in the dance of thousands of civilians on both sides of the front line. ah who catch orders? yep. it does dileskimo. there's a more than a deposit yet, a bit more durable. a particular good. just give sure to should go in there a day and a shimmering you started math. did your specific data specific renette especially yes, hip never in as version there for like restaurant to point to centers that could say not can you enough of care done yet? i see absolutely, well, i mean that's up to the valley as all parts. scott, help me my re enough time. i know that apollo chip is when you buy michelle for a small that the hot seas there today at the one that fortunately a culture shop and you which i, because i journey such a shy to great deal. graham. okay. in the war shock briefly. mother as thought georgia dream, but i knew you spoke under no salt on south africa. nick a logo. what did surely form through that across the domain itself, but then i paid a check. yep. um, for a bottle worth him to have a good amount of virginia for he

, so adm is gsa. the gsa umbrella, public works was a part of it. so prop b actually removed public works from the city administrator's office and you are playing the oversight role for the sanitation and trees department once it forms -- sanitation and streets once it forms october 1st so that's why the city administrator's office is involved. to help set you up for success -- [mic is off] you hit the ground run and approximately 1/3 of my -- my time is dedicated to establishing you and the public works commission. so, we had a dedicated oversight and accountability working group and that group was charged with developing recommendations for how to best comply with your mandate. i'm here today to share those recommendations with you and as secretary fuller mentioned, this is just an information item. there's no official action for you to take today and just know you're free to modify this approach as you go, of course in consultation with director short and secretary fuller. so, my presentation has f

and then they managed to travel on gsa kate got to decide the obstacles or the challenges that are waiting for them. now is the work on the sides and that is, of course a lot what they need to do there. and there we don't at all. no, under what conditions they will be able to work, whether they will get full access or not. russia has promised it, but we will still need to see the results. and they've got in, which is it one you know, successful step in a larger, larger process. if it is possible to broker some kind of solution to ensure the safety of the plan and the people around it, ah, what kind of shape could it take? do you think? is there any discussion about that? what the missions are objective is to assess what the situation is like other security systems working, how big is the damage? what are the working conditions? is there any risk from a difficult conditions between the ukrainian stuff and the management that has been brought in from russia, et cetera, et cetera. what are the conditions there? and this needs to be monitored? it needs to be monitored longer than this, possibl

of course, a critical civilian infrastructure was damaged as well as gsa i key if a regime of forces or trying to do everything possible in order to disrupt this so voting process. now, despite all that voting took place that sir, now was actually on believable, at least 97 percent of the population came out to vote. and now we know the result as well. now, i walked around with these mobile referred new groups as well. and obviously i spoke to the people who were voting and sam y and you know, they were doing it absolutely freely. not like the west media port crated to be as if they were forced to vote him this referendum, you know, under the barrel of a gun. absolutely not. now, i suppose many of those people and so you can hear their opinion about this referendum right now. gordon. garden to will no one forces us to come. you can see yourself. people come voluntarily, i'm so happy i'm about to cry. you blocker live people crying with joy. there were people from the russian control territories in ukraine. who said this there has finally come. i'm so glad i leave to seal this day, i

. >> dana: it's interesting that the gsa was in the white house doing that. >> greg: it some low levelng. this is the silliest and most ridiculous story and accredit the media for trying to make this thing into something huge. >> dana: jessica, do you disagree with greg? >> jessica: i do. i think absolutely every level of what he said. we are in a new place where it seems like everybody accepts he did something wrong and andy mccarthy talking about likely to be indicted at this point come up with the question is what are we going to do about it. what the president said on true and the various surrogates he has, he's been conned in so many lies it's difficult account but the affidavit and what they filed, do not unseal the affidavit and he said i declassified everything. guess what, when they asked for a special master they agreed they needed top-secret clearance to be able to review t the materials. it is a game of distraction. when they seize all defendant no and that staged like that, i don't hear you guys all absent, it's exactly how it looks. >> judge jeanine: that's after arrest a

and the one case that directly applies here is a later case involving nixon, involving the gsa, in which there is a famous line in there which is that the privilege is not personal to the president, it belongs to the republic and that is a critical issue here. there is no basis for, in this case, judge cannon to say to the government, your not allowed to see your own executive branch documents. that just makes no sense at all. >> glenn, thank you so much for helping us understand this a little bit more ahead of the deadline today. >> thank you. >> so many big legal questions. still to come this hour, a war of words. a texas sheriff has announced an investigation into migrants flown to marg tha's vineyard as the florida governor stands business hi actions. >> we get things done in florida. >> just from a human rights perspective, what was done to these folks is wrong. >> what is the law. we're looking into it all. including the fine print of the taxpayer money that governor desantis and others used to fund these trips. >>> plus president biden is preparing to address the u.n. general asse

and, you know, the gsa transported the boxes, but it was up to him and his team to decide what goes in them. the question of even after the june meeting, by the way, where they're told to make sure they secure all classified items in the storage room according to this document, according to this list, seven boxes were still found and containers were still found in his office and 27 documents with classification markings, 7 that were top secret. so that is just -- it's hard to explain. and i don't know that the president's team has even tried to try to explain that. >> sara, the fbi put out that picture that we've now all seen. obviously this is not how they found it, as president trump has suggested. we know it wasn't strewn around on the ground. it's not much better. all of these top secret, the highest classification, the secret compartmented information all in the box, as you can see, with the "time" magazine covers there. this is why the judge is taking her time, though we expect it could come at any moment, trying to decide if a special master is needed, because who is sift throug

they've been trying to say that the gsa packed them, he had no idea how the documents ended up in mar-a-lago. and here he is on hannity saying something that could come back to haunt him should this case ever go to charges. >> if you're the justice department, even though you don't agree with what he's saying, you want him to keep talking. >> keep talking. >> let's go back to the civil case now. we played a bit at the top of the show with sean hannity, donald trump said i'm not going to pay a little amount because that would say i'm guilty. these processes could take a long time but how does it generally unfold? >> well, most civil litigation ends up settling, i like to call them long protracted settlement negotiations. this is early in the case. just a complaint has been filed. it's a mon is it rouse complaint with an enormous amount of detail. now comes the answer, maybe motion to dismiss, discovery will be put forth. so this is going to be a long process ahead. and that's trump's usual m.o. is he wants to delay it. he'll get his chance in this case. >> if you read the 200 plus pages, near

certainly from nixon versus gsa, which is one of the presidents of the doj set repeatedly in the filingtelligence community is somehow divorce from the department of justice on the fbi, when in fact the fbi as part of the national security community. again, all of these things i think were misunderstandings that were littered throughout this opinion. and this is really the doj's opportunity to ask roger canada to rethink and walk some of this back. >> i like the way you put, that walking back a decision. it could be a based on the -- the frank was giving us. among the reasons that the doj said it needs a continuous investigation, those 48 extra folders mark classified, within that was part of the mar-a-lago stash. the doj filing says that the fbi is responsible for finding out if they lost or compromised. frank, how significant is that? >> yeah i mean, just as important as what they found is what they didn't find. and the question of where is it. because as you said, they've got 40 some odd empty folders marked classified. and you've got to figure out whether that simply means that the

nixon versus gsa.tempt to deny specific master access to the various documents. and the judge at one point told the doj lawyer, look, this is essentially not settled law. that is this has not been fully explored, this issue. so as i hear that, that is a way to kind of tee up this case or this issue potentially to wind up before the u.s. supreme court where, as we know, a majority of the justices are republican or were appointed by republicans. that's probably a glimpse of the things that we'll see to come. >> mark, one of the other topics discussed yesterday beyond the possibility of a special master, it does seem like it may still be going that direction, is the idea of putting in public a more detailed list of what was seized from -- by agents there at the palm beach estate. give us a sense as to when we might see that list and do we have an idea of just how detailed and therefore potentially more damming to trump that list will be? >> i'm being led to believe it's not detailed. it's not the stuff we