mr. winslow, thank you. >> last call for public comment. seeing no additional request to speak. is there any rebuttal? >> thank you, ryan paterson, no rebuttal. i would say procedurally the request is take dr and approve the project on the basis of the amended plans, which are before you today. thank you, commissioners. >> okay. mr. tunny, if you want to raise your hand, you can speak as well. okay. mr. tunny, is this you? >> yes, it is. thank you, mr. secretary. just to reiterate the project sponsor agreed to the terms with the intention that they allow the project to move forward as proposed and limit the appeals going forward and so we would hope that the commission would honor the agreement both parties have. thank you. >> great. thank you. commissioners with that, the public hearing portion of this item is closed. and it's now before you. >> commissioner koppel? >> move to take dr and approve with the agreements made today. >> second. >> second. >> thank you, commissioners on that motion to take dr and approve with modifications as submitted. commissioner ruiz? >> aye. >> c

mr. winslow and requesting they revise the dra.hat memo was ignored as was my request at the august 21, 2019 planning commission meeting to revise the minutes. the issuance of that false dr is documented in the attached whistle blower complaint that you have. it is my hope that my public comment today will motivate others who have been the victim of the issuance of a false dra issued by the planning commission to come forward to share their experience with the planning commission. thank you. >> public speaker: good afternoon, commissioners, i'm from the neighborhood association. as we look at the language of the most recent draft, the item no. 2, somehow, i would like to suggest some additional language that would strengthen that particular item which we think are in the upper chinatown critical to the viability of our culture of our neighborhood. in the language right now it has commissioners recognize the rent control ordinance and its direct impact as it relates to tenant rights and evictions and obligation. i would like to add

mr. winslow.winslow family. >> hello, ladies, i thought we'd all do our homework together. >> uh-oh. dad's paying bills, i'm outta here. >> me too. >> and they have this really annoying neighbor, steve urkel. >> when i went to audition for steve urkel, i was just supposed to be a day player. that's it. i brought the glasses, they belonged to my father. i got this little pea head when he gave me his glasses, they just kind of wobbled on my face. >> i hear you can't get a date for the dance, so you want to go with me? >> she'd rather eat worms. >> okay, some other time then. >> he was so quirky and so odd, but he was so beloved. >> you know, he loves polka. he loves cheese. >> got any cheese? >> he had the dancing and then "did i do that"? >> did i do that? >> he really sort of took over the series. >> a lot of people feel awkward. so, in the weirdest way, he instilled self-pride in other people. it's like, "hey, that guy can be awkward and go after the girl of his dreams and share what he's about w

mr. winslow? there are often cases they are not code compliant in bringing them to compliance is making improve ams that would make them legal. >> that's under the scope of this request. and under this permit 2 feet down to provide ceiling height. >> that's when is under reruin this permit of legalizing the udu2 de feo to provide head room for the unauthorized unit. >> i'm puzzled how that would work the structure is what it is how dig down without altering the building. i will take that. i'm jim houston. >> i did not ask you. >> through the permit application to replace foundation and excan have a bilt to provide head room for the udu to legalize it. at this moment in the current state, the unit is not occupiability? period? >> not legally that's why. >> okay. mr. lum still here? if you would not mind raising a number. important questions i look at a project like this in the place too many issues would you about your observations and have him respond it your questions. >> i stated in the hand out

mr. winslow to send me drawings which are contained within the drawings. i think the commission who reads from paper copies has a very difficult time following this project. for that very reason, i think there is a conduct of care that this project should be continued until proper drawings are submitted, and the signage for this project are in the right space. i think that is a reasonable request. >> does the team have time for that item. >> i will refer to commission secretary. i think you were not asked to speak. so you are deliberating. >> they should be afforded the opportunity to speak to the continuance. >> is this the moment? >> there wouldn't be any other moment. >> would any other commissioner want to weigh in on my point of continuance? >> again, if the materials are submitted especially if it's in paper form, it gives other commissioner or commissioners that rely on this position, i would support the continuance. >> did you want to afford the project sponsor? >> i would also support the continuance but also afford the project sponsor time to spe