well, what can be said here if without mother, you can answer with the words of tsar leonid, who saidnd take it well, actually, that’s all , that is, in fact . months ago, it actually hasn’t changed, that is, i’m on the front line, it’s there. well, maybe a kilometer two there are three, but with the naked eye, as they say, without a microscope , it’s even imperceptible. and where are the actual changes in the front line, that is, well, you can say anything, but in fact, the ukrainian troops are very we stand on our positions, it happens sometimes very difficult moments are unbearably difficult because this is a war, this is a terrible war, a war with a very strong opponent, but everything is holding up and you can see that in the south they have already started a little counter-polom ah, i don't see any reasons to believe that russia can organize some uh-uh large-scale offensive, look now, but just why did the concern arise here in the rear, we definitely don't feel the same way. how about you at the front, and that's why this third army corps of some kind began to move towards our t

they show up in the moscow region , well, yes, khimki but if you remember the famous answer of tsar leonidcalmer, if it means everyone will participate our army or half. well, i'll tell you so. now, if something happens, yes, our people will, of course, eat people will have a chance, no, vladimir vladimirovich, about if bloomer only explained, uh, everything, very clearly. yes, that's the slow advance of russia in the donbass is the defeat of russia and the slow advance of ukraine in the kherson direction this is the victory of ukraine, that is. eh, here, you have to understand, this is a big difference, in general, of course. as for the zaluzhny article, listen, it’s surprising, of course, that the commander-in-chief writes such voluminous policy articles during military operations. to be honest, i don’t remember such a thing in the history of military operations. apparently you know this is such an excerpt, or something from the report on rammstein and on rammstein, i suppose so. but you understand. i have carefully read this proposed strategy, laid down for 2023, he has been painting th

the dnieper and if they affect the moscow region, well, yes, khimki but if the famous answer of tsar leonid , of course, there are people, then there will be chances, no, vladimir vladimirovich, about if bloomer only explained, uh, everything, very clearly. why is russia's slow advance in the donbass the defeat of russia and the slow progress of ukraine in the direction of kherson this is the victory of ukraine, that is. eh, here. you must understand, this is a big difference, of course. listen to the bill of the zaluzhny article , it’s surprising, of course, that the commander in chief writes such voluminous policy articles during military operations. i honestly do not remember this in the history of military operations. apparently you know this is such an excerpt, or something from the report on rammstein and rammstein, i suppose so. but you understand, i carefully read this proposed strategy laid down for 2023, he has been painting the company for 23 years, which immediately comes to mind. but what about the recently set plan of hodjas about reaching the border on february 20, well, the

tsar. in russian history, it became synonymous with betrayal, but centuries later, in separatism, he became a national hero and an example to follow at the suggestion of the first president of the independent leonid kravchuk, it was kravchuk who, using the state money of ukraine, placed ointments, known throughout the entire russian world as a traitor, that is, he consistently shows in this direction to break away from russia as much as possible but due to inertial electoral preferences. me still russian-speaking soviet ukrainians, he flirted with them to power with the step of mazepa for many years, selflessly servants somewhere, and in the ideological department of the communist party, he debunked the myths about the holodomor. he anathematized bandera and built a bright communist future, however, when he caught it in the eighties. the wind of change began to actively cooperate with the nationalist people's rukh and already in june 1990, with his direct support, he was elected chairman of the supreme soviet of the ussr a year later, when it became clear that ggchp failed, kravchuk announced his withdrawal from the cpsu. it was he who would be called the main initiator of the collapse of the uni