warhol made this silk screen of prince from a 1981 photograph by by lynn goldsmith. she sued warhol's foundation claiming copyright infringement. >> what is the reason or justifn to take another's copyrighted work? the reason can't be to avd paying the customary price. >> warhol's changes to it for t. if it loses the case, the foundn could owe goldsmith millions in fees and royalties. > >> fda gave emergency use authon to administer updated covid-19 boosters to kids as young as five years old. this is the samt be available to kids 12 and older last month. it targets the the original coronavirus strain and the omicron sub variants. te booster for kids should be avaie within a week. > >> europe could be heading towas another wave of covid-19 infect. europe is the only region wheres went up 8% uptick in fact in the the week that ended october sec. officials are recommending evere get vaccinated for covid and the the flu. > >> the first space tours is getg ready to blast off. >> california millionaire went o the international space station back in 2001. his first trip on

the image was based on a 1981 photograph by lynn goldsmith.rhol's foundation, claiming copyright infringement. the justices did find some lighter moments, when clarence thomas revealed his musical tastes. >> let's say that i'm both a prince fan, which i was in the '80s, and um -- >> no longer? [laughter] >> well, only on thursday nights. [laughter] >> trevor: [deep voice] oh, yeah. justice thomas, i see you, you little freak-nasty. six days a week, it's shapeless black robes, but then thursday hits, and you got that chest bush of chest hair popping out. yeah! [normal voice] and i know a lot of people might be wondering why thomas only listens to prince on thursday nights specifically, but you see, clarence thomas is an originalist, and it's all right there in the constitution. night. it says that, we always go back. i don't know why they put that in there, but they did. but yeah, the big question in this case is if andy warhol simply copied the prince picture, or if he made it his own by transforming it. and it just so happens that i'm an art

supreme court heard oral argument in a copyright battle concerning photographer lynn goldsmith's photographsinger-songwriter prints and andy warhol's use of that in his work. his legal team argued he created a different meaning and message than the original photo and they were allowed under the copyright laws. artists, photographers illegal legal experts are monitoring the case closely because it could have an impact on photographer'' work in modern art more broadly. >> campbell requires an examination of meaning or message. google reaffirms that an sites warhol's soup cans as an example of when it is satisfied. goldsmith's testament is at odds with both cases. our approach, unlike goldsmith's , maintains the balance between protecting artist rights to monetize their work and encouraging new and important follow on expression. we give follow on artists credit for innovation at factor 1 while recognizing factor four and the other factors will cut decisively the other way. goldsmith's necessity test appends that vantage point. it violates 107's text, contradicts precedent, and underwrites the