spieth in fact milton freedman noticed you back in 2005. we know who milton freedman is here.e said among other things israel was a socialist state. he said until it stops becoming a socialist state it is not going to succeed. it's not going to secede economically in so many other ways. certainly has the capacity. she said fortunately finance manager benjamin netanyahu understands the problem is willing to use his political capitol to bring a solution. that is way back in 2005. you also went to mit. you are highly educated here in the united states as a matter fact. and i want to pursue some of this and we come back. your experiences in the united states. and i want the american people to know but you also served in the most special special forces in israel as did your brother. i want to talk about that a little bit as well. the book is "bibi: my story". you can get it at bibimystory.com, bibimystory.com, or amazon.com. that comes out on to say this is his first exclusive interview. we will be right back. so i go triple... with trelegy. with 3 medicines in 1 inhaler,... it's t

he read from all theso classic economist adam smith, george gilder was a great friend of his, milton freedman, some of the classics, and he read, studied them and remembered them. i learned how to apply them in different situations. and he could articulate the concepts whether that leadership meeting or a town hall or in a tv interview. he could explain it better than anybody else i think i know. many leadership meetings to be a big battle about something dick would launch into this soliloquy bringing in several famous economists of the passengers shut the whole thing down. they would there was a i can't argue with that. and later when he became a believer in christ years into his career he learned to live out his faith in everything heha did. that gave him a tremendous piece. particularly towards the end when used unfairly maligned by a lot of people should have been his friend. he had to go s through a lot and he did it with the peaceful heart. not many of us could have walked there with the way he did i think. but he also developed true friendships with people that you would not expect. th

you cannot talk about it without talking to have milton freedman is not in the modern times we are inight now. >> frankly it's a whole other conversation. i do think he has been misquoted somewhat. it was very clear in c that article that the nature of how corporations participate in the global economy and society would very much be driven by social and cultural contexts. i think this is a freedom to think more broadly about with the mission of rural corporations are. and of course in at 140 character world with basically giving the short strip and blame them for the financial privacy argument. that change as you know in 2019 at the business roundtable essentially articulating a very clear broader aperture with respect to the responsibility of corporations to incorporate not just financial shareholders for the full range of shareholders such as communities, employees, regulators and at large. but to come back to your specific question what is this t mean about the changing role? there is also the proliferation of areas such asvi environmenta, social and governance questions which acco

is not a milton freedman argument about how you build an economy.t's about political power and who has ended within china stop from getting it. as happens so aggressively since barack obama won the white house. the embodiment of something they feared for very long time can happen for the ready for came out before saying that sent a message over and over and over you disagree with them a little bit. you think january 6 will happen now we'll stick and when the democrats can move to have a box of messaging? >> i a great job. just democrats the person leading most of this is a bipartisan hearing. first thing any message is to get people to hearou you. the fact is 20 million people to what was the first one that is unbelievable. that is 6 million more people watching a congressional hearing in game six of the nba finals. like that is wild and no impressive. this is in the eye discovered research on the book that's 80 million fewer people are chase line. measures of some social terms of facebook engagement off the roof orde democrats were usually slaughte

milton freedman says there's only one cause inflation in america it's overspending by congress read her note that a democratic congress that rubberstamps everything joe biden does. he once more spending that results in inflation rate evan mcmullin would support that. he departed the democratic establishment. that's what you tongs are going to vote for me. >> also has run an ad talks but ukraine and russia said you voted against russian sanctions you voted against brain and check were the only member not blacklisted by blood or put in himself can explain the votes and tell us what is your position on putin and his invasion of ukraine? >> i am a strong believer in the fact volodydmyr put in is an evil man who needs to be stopped i voted for the first ukrainian package pretty voted against the second ukraine package along with the package of sanctions a few years ago. not because of the underlying issue or because in any affinity for him. but rather they were packaged together with a number of progressive liberal policies that i object too. for evan mcmullin to suggest otherwise is an abso

that obviously was a counterforce to milton freedman's 1970 article in which he basically planted a a flagn the sand essentially suggesting that the financial primacy shareholders and financial primacy were really the key sort of attributes important role corporations play. >> host: shareholder versus stakeholder. you can't talk about without saying milton friedman is maybe not in the modern times we're in right now. >> guest: a whole nother conversation. i do think he has been misquoted somewhat. he was very clear in that article that the nature of how corporations participate in the global economy. he would be driven by social agenda and cultural context. that gives enough degrees of freedom to think more broadly about what the mission and role of corporations are. of course in the 140 character world we have given the short shrift and blamed him for the financial primacy argument. but that changed as you know in 2019 with the business roundtable essentially articulating a very clear broader i should say widening of the aperture with respect to the responsibility of corporations to

andrew, as you know, a lot of folks love to -- in a cult-like figure, worship what milton freedman saideople cite it and never read it, he actually says it's in the long run interest of the shareholders for corporations to address what he called the social amenities to be a responsible employer. that's what he says if they actually read the article. there's no gap here. companies have to pick and choose where the issues matter and right now china you can't condemn them from attacking taiwan if they haven't if they act as russia did -- >> what do you make of the idea of you get to pick and choose. one of the things that happens on this show, we're all looking for a model so everything is consistent and maybe we should just lean into the idea that actually the world is idiosyncratic and you take on the issues you and don't for the ones you can't -- >> general motors doesn't make every car -- >> hold on jeff, hang on. vivek. >> you can take one of two positions either of which would be better than the inconsistent world we're in now companies should engage on all social issues, from januar