serhiy serhiy zguretsa, director of the a-a defense express agency, host of the military section summaries of the day from sergey, i would like to ask you something. i have a good evening today. greetings. greetings to our viewers. today i thought that the russians started making a film just during the second world war, because i saw a video where soldiers were riding on some kind of vehicle, and they were soviet ones. fairy tales and rifles, this is the basis on which the hail fought, and then it turned out that this is not a film, that it is actually these newly mobilized people going to war and they were equipped like this, i am already silent about the plastic bulletproof vests for the mobilized people of the skver region sergey what do you think this is such equipment and such weapons how to explain it from the side of those who send those to war and something what actually the personnel themselves feel they want to quickly escape from the battlefield or surrender , but there are other examples, in particular, related to that what is the enemy trying to rattle weapons? i have just transferred these mig-31 fighter jets to belarus, which are supposed to be the carriers of these nuclear ammunition, including these hypersonic dagger missiles, and i will remind you that right now the training of the nato countries is taking place - this is training steady noon, which is precisely aimed at working out the cooperation of nato countries in the use of nuclear weapons, and russia, in turn, is now trying literally in a few days to conduct its exercises called there thunder 20 times information about the appearance of mig 31 fighters in belarus, or rather, bombers 31 which can be used for launching k- daggers is actually the basis for an attempt to somehow regulate the training of nato countries, but in general, today we also want to talk about other aspects of today, this is primarily, however how many weapons do we still need? what air defense models are being handed over to us by other countries and what is actually happening on the fronts, about that in a moment. so, ukraine wants to have more weapons, and this is an absolutely understandable desire, because we have a significant number of personnel in the defense security forces and successful actions require a significant military increase, the american edition politico submitted another list of weapons equipment with which ukraine turned to the pentagon, and in my opinion, this list fully corresponds to the current problems and the needs of the armed forces of ukraine, which are for the removal and counteroffensive actions and for the restoration of losses and for the arming of new units, and by the way, this list , in my opinion, fully corresponds to the format that ukraine can receive from the united states in the landliza format, because it is about samples of weapons that today it is in the storage bases of the us army so this list includes 300 tanks of multiple rocket systems 255 howitzers of caliber 155 mm 500 anti-aircraft guns - 1 anti-aircraft gun - 72 short-range anti-aircraft guns i think these are hungarian salaries therefore, with such a number, ukraine could arm 10 more mechanized brigades, 2-3 barrel artillery brigades and a rocket artillery brigade. all these weapons are really needed because they will help us liberate ukrainian territories and multiply the power of strikes on enemy targets. and it is very important to ensure air defense population centers and military units from missile strikes , so i think that the fact that there is no list yet, and there are also airplanes, does not mean that this topic is closed because the pentagon and the political leadership the usa understands that we need these samples of weapons . but as i understand it, the pentagon and washington will be afraid to cross certain lines for the time being, and as for other samples, i think that they can really arrive in the landlizzo format, which we have begun to forget a little, but this is the right format for interaction with the exact states are active. and we really need to use all this, we really need it for the front and to change the situation on the front line. and what is happening on the fronts, the total length of which in the hot phase is about 800 km, we will now talk with military expert retired colonel serhiimr. serhii i congratulate you if you see me and good evening good evening serhii i see and hear you well the armed forces have been on the offensive for quite a long period of time there since august 29 there has been an offensive in the kherson direction since september 6 in the kharkiv direction and from the point of view of operational science, it seems that there should be some kind of operational pause, but it does not happen, how can you explain such a paradox in the actions of the ukrainian armed forces, you know if we are talking about science in the last war, it violated a lot of such stable rules of this military science, because we remember with you how we learned that the attacking side cannot have less forces and resources compared to the defending side, but we broke this tactic er, this postulate led to active offensive combat operations, well, in particular, in the kharkiv direction, and this is precisely what is connected with the fact that we are not talking about the