well, we spoke to michael rectinwald's, michael son or 3rd of google archipelago, the digital. good luck on the simulation of freedom. he said the recent revelations prove twitter had basically been functioning as a u. s. government agency, well, it shows that they have been, they had been targeting trump for a long time, and this is just part of an overall establishment campaign to destroy him. i mean, they ran a legal operations to attempt to connect him to russia in the russian collusion narrative and some of the people that worked at twitter, including james baker were also active in that russian collusion expedition. so it tells me that the twitter has been operating as a state agent, and they had a definite they have trump in the crosshairs, just waiting for him to step over the line or what they consider to be over the line. he never violated twitter rules. they just associated his speech with the violence or the mark violence really that took place on january 6 at the capital. so they were what they were laying and wait, looking for an excuse to ban him from, from the p

it's astounding scholar, a former new york university professor, author and professor michael rectinwald's. thank you. and those are the hour and the week top news stories for more up to the minute news coverage. head over to r t dot com. thanks for joining in. we'll see you again at the top of the hour. ah, i lose the use ah with mm. unwelcome soils apart, the world may have low become a global village but the wrong.

let's cross lived a former and while you professor an author of google archipelago, michael rectinwald's. welcome, michael. nice to see you. thank you. how much of an impact could the hunter biden story have had on election night if it hadn't faced such censorship on social media? well, according to polls that had a decisive effect that pulls for taking the show, the more you know, many people would have switched their vote had they known about this, the scandal. and so that it's cover up was pretty, pretty significant. it's electoral interference really. so we see the not only former f b i, agents like james baker, but current f b i. agents were actually involved in meeting with twitter or twitter employees. executives in the lead up to the election and telling them what to, to sensor and what not to do. do you mean anything counter to the narrative? and that was not flattering to biden, to say, the least as this information, and then blaming it on russia. you are most fire james baker, after the files were published. you must also has ties to the state department as well. can we expect

previous releases of lakes join r t dot com. former new york university professor and author michael rectinwald's. slam such violations of the u. s. is 1st amendment. this is a violation of the 1st amendment of the united states, which does not permit the government to dictate expression to dictate speech. and we're seeing plethora of data that shows, in fact, that they did that and a lot more. and one has to wonder whether they're actually meddling in elections themselves and whether they're, since they are basically an organ, the democratic party, the f, b i. that is, we're starting to wonder whether the f b i in fact has some call culpability, with reference to covering up election crimes on the part of the democratic party. it's utterly illegitimate and it's known as economic fascism. when you have this kind of collusion between the state and these corporate players and you're saying that they're so tightly knitted together, that there's almost no extricating them. and it's as if we have a state run media here. this is very, very reminiscent of totalitarian regimes. there's politicize ation h

we heard from big tech ex foot michael rectinwald's is says twitter has long been used as a political tool by the democratic party. there are basically 3 issues involved here. the 1st issue is the twitter. it's been revealed and we, we knew this spot. it's really official now has been operating as the democratic party organ, essentially with democratic operatives running the company before elan mass took over and maybe a little bit now as well. the 2nd issue is that we have the question of government officials directing twitter to squelch particular speech, which is a 1st amendment violation. you'll hear a lot of people say, well, that's not 1st amendment violation because it's a private platform. well, government intervention to squelch speech is a 1st amendment violation. and the 3rd issue is to we have election interference here. and it's apparent that we do, and that would be in kind donation on the part of twitter, to the democratic party without any recognition or acknowledgment which is against the law, gods abide and laptop scaled broke shortly before the 2020 you as president

we also spoke to big tech expert, michael rectinwald's, who said twitter developed a relationship with the u. s. government to pursue its own interests. this is clearly a use of a private company to control the narrative and to do psychological operations. not only in the united states, twitter is also been involved in foreign policy exploits and psychological operations. it is a very deceptive practice that the state is using a private enterprise to conduct psychological operations abroad. influencing people in various countries, not just the united states, but in the middle east. regarding us policy, it's not surprising that we see twitter operating this way. they will probably, in some sense, they're totally beholden to the state and they don't care about profit. they just care about doing the bidding of the state because that's who has their backs ultimately can know their story were across today for you. western officials have reportedly admitted there's no evidence to link russia to the nord stream gas pipeline explosions with a handful of officials expressed regret. but so many

rachel blevins will. archie also spoke to jolt men, host of the conservative daily podcast and michael rectinwald's, author of google archipelago, the digital log in the simulation of freedom. and i both suggest the biden laptop story demonstrates deep ties between social networks in the u. s. on the political establishment, think that it's not just happening on twitter, happens on facebook and instagram, and all of the social platforms, when i find more disturbing, is that they just seem to go to the same gas lighting the american people walk past didn't say nothing to see here, and then they repeatedly lie. they have not told the truth to the people about anything in the 100 biden story. the laptop story by itself is one piece of evidence. but if you look at tony bob lensky and the other people that came forward, that said that joe biden was actively involved in these, these negotiations overseas. and to see some of the things the laws that were broken that were put any american in handcuffs within minutes to see him living in a $30000000.00 mansion have secret service all around them. i think it

assume that they may have been and the caution is warranted for more and why you professor michael rectinwald's. believe that's the censorship factor played a crucial role in influencing the 2020 election results. many people would have switched their vote had they known about this, the scandal. and so that its cover up was pretty, pretty significant. its electoral interference really. so we see the not only former f b i, agents like james baker, but current f, b i. agents were actually involved in meeting with twitter or twitter employees. executives in the lead up to the election and telling them what to, to censor and what not to do, deeming anything counter to the narrative. and that was not flattering to biden, to say, the least as this information and, and blaming it on russia. because as we know, the f, b, i is really the enforcement arm of the democratic party. as we saw with the russian collusion, narrative, it is not the russians of course, that are doing this. this is actually the democratic party. so when they use the word russia, really it's a stand in for their own activities. 12

we spoke to a big dec expert, michael rectinwald's, who believes twitter developed a relationship with the u. s. government though, in order to pursue its own interests, have allison. this is clearly a use of a private company to control the narrative and to do psychological operations. not only in the united states, twitter is also been involved in foreign policy exploits and psychological operations. it is a very deceptive practice that the state is using a private enterprise to conduct psychological operations abroad, influencing people in various countries, not just the united states, but in the middle east. regarding u. s. policy, it's not surprising that we see twitter operating this way. they will probably, in some sense, they're totally beholden to the state and they don't care about profit. they just care about doing the bidding of the state because that's who has their backs. ultimately. what would you be surprised to hear that western officials are report, lee admitted as 0 evidence, telling russia to the well sabotage and explosions of the nordstrom gas pipelines with a han

while michael rectinwald's again believes further details in the scandal will soon be revealed, but possibly only to an extent, because he must have business links with the u. s. government twitter operated as an organ of the democratic party and the state that they run unilaterally in the united states. so it tells us that twitter has been a propaganda, oregon, and a censorship, oregon, and a surveillance, oregon for the state. and for the democratic party that runs it. we suspected this or whether we knew it now, it's merely just been verified. more information is bound to come out that will indict twitter for these practices and more and probably show collusion with the f b i and the home department of homeland security. these. this is already in the news that homeland security and f. b, i officials both met with social media executives to instruct them as to what content to suppress and ban. so will expect more at some point. since, you know, it's not as if a lawn mosque has no connections with the state. after all, he's got contracts for his space x program with the, with the government