alexei nechaev alexei gennadievich hello, welcome to the state duma, the spring session has started, and you started it with a bill on armor for, uh, entrepreneurs, you called for the fact that hmm entrepreneurs need to be protected from mobilization. why it was with this bill that they started and how you see it there are a lot of entrepreneurs in our country , but still give a delay to give a reservation, this is different, because we see two such, well, not very good things. first, after all, justice is very important in russia. there are already 2.5 million officials in russia. and as the minister of defense told us, 1,700 officials have been mobilized. this is 0.07%. yes, less than 0.0 entrepreneurs. in russia, it is considered a little less than 6 million. of these, those who made the enterprise are two and a half. there are millions of shimi, and those who are entrepreneurs in detail are 3.5 a little more than a million. that is, this is 6 million, the business community of them is also mobilized, according to the minister of defense 27.000, which is almost half a percent. it turns out that there is a sixfold difference between the need for officials at the front and the need for entrepreneurs. but this, of course, hurts people, because, well, justice is a very delicate moment in russia historically and the second thing. we are in the form of a bill not all entrepreneurs. yes, not all six million people should be given reservations, but those who employ five or more people, because i also see now, and signals are sent to us in the committee on small and medium enterprises and just at meetings with voters, what do they say, well, a man was taken away, and he has several employees and they are where they are without him, so he is both a director and an owner. there the family can't pick up. well, that is, jobs are important to us, it is important for us that people have jobs and freedom. and when there is nowhere to work, well, how can i say, it’s not great, so the bill is divided into two categories of entrepreneurs who have five employees or more, and also, so you don’t know some shenanigans, we said. that during the six months of domobilization, these five employees already worked for you? that's just the fuse, not now, quickly once, probably, finished drawing and the second thing the second option is the category - these are those who have farms. doesn't matter. you alone work there and the employees, because farmers are very sensitive, they are also people who are few in russia, and they keep a lot of them. there is a large share of ours. uh food. yes, food products are created by agricultural holdings, but farmers go the most complex, the most ungrateful, and work now to remove them. and there are also machine operators there, so they are so actively taken away. if the move is in the regions, these are two very sensitive categories, we will bring more benefit from them. uh, creating jobs, creating taxes on products, and at the front. well, what about them? well , yes, well, so far this is an initiative. how are you? what response did you hear from the deputies to this idea? what do you think, when it can become a law, firstly, and we ourselves. yesterday, for example, i said in a speech that there are still several categories of very sensitive, for example, it people in the modern world of it technologies are digital, it is similar to the fact that there were engineers there 100 years ago. that's what this industry is based on. this is the core of the economy. generally. so are the engineers. this is the core of the industry if the equipment does not work. nothing will happen. we see another second thing, for example, there are not enough at the front, for example, digital battle control systems. yes , how modern is nato, which they put in ukraine, how much it is not modern with us. yes, we won't be there yet. comment, but there is something to do, so we didn’t have enough numbers before the start, about a million vacancies to enter the industry were not filled, imagine and correctly the ministry of figures is fighting to give reservations to it specialists, but there is for the sake of the electronics industry, including and at the front, it is necessary that people not sit there in the trenches, but here they create smart shells , create an electronic warfare system so that we plant strangers. there these drones, thank god now there sevastopol for example, also intercepted. there are more than twenty of these drones that flew, but all this is required by modern e brains of modern hands, and the third category. that is, we say it specialist, radio electronics engineers. the fact that yes, over 100 years, engineers have changed a lot, and all technologists are based on them, because many processes there are chemistry in the same food technology. take away. well, quality can go like that, maybe, god forbid, someone will poison someone, there is something else that is very sensitive, so this is also waiting for its introduction, but you need to eat the elephant in parts , you need to act step by step, and here we are , including in the controversy of deputies from other factions, we see support from the liberal democratic party, and so the colleagues of fair russia thought there united russia , therefore this should be discussed at the committee at the duma council, we are campaigning. how to say we justify this, we weigh where there is more benefit, of course. eh, this is in what sense of the word , too, people say? and why are these coming, these coming? there are some delicate moments too. this should be discussed if the society decides that they are more useful here once again jobs with money entrepreneurs, therefore support, but this is a big discussion, it has already begun. yesterday, well, yes, the controversy there was really serious. here vyacheslav volodin said that, in fact, everyone should serve, and that there is even an idea not to let those who did not serve in the army into the civil service, how do you feel about this, by the way? well, as i said, for now, for example, from the civil service. i say six times fewer people were mobilized, so it's necessary here. uh, firstly, in the words of vyacheslav volodin as a person. there is such a deep rational grain. yes, that is, it is not blank idea, as if what he says, do you want to serve in the public service. served in the army. there is logic in this, but many unanswered questions probably have answers, but do not require public discussion either. well, for example , a woman to go with us almost half of the civil servants are women. there is a little less, so that the patina of civil servants women also have to serve in the army, as in israel, for example, or like switzerland or a woman, like men can only for the sake of the army, but women can in any case, that's how historical thinks this. we will ask him, here the question is generally about women, as they say, in principle, should a woman serve in the army, they will answer this question, the second is the second big point. we have, for example, disabled people. yes, we have people, uh , several people in the state duma, people are very, uh, good people, they are substantial. they are someone in a wheelchair. yes, someone is also there, uh, and they uh still bring great benefits anyway. it does not matter united russia or where from, because people, uh, know the problems, for example, people, uh, with disabilities. we have several million person in the country. that is, this is a huge category of our uh people, you understand? they did not serve in the army, so what is not their place in the state duma is considered to be a shield. volodya i don’t think he thinks so, if we make exceptions, that is, these are still questions, but in the end there is a constitution the constitution gives both active electoral rights the right to elect, and passive the right to be elected to all citizens, therefore people here, let them decide their attitude to the constitution already. of course, we voted before our colleagues. uh, last season. yes former neighbors. lots of questions here. this solution is hacked. here everything requires, of course, a detailed discussion. well, you probably already mentioned that the delay for entrepreneurs is one of the ways to support. e economy saving economy jobs. oh well, you said also offer us. here is the realized return. here the party says, here we will take into politics we have 200,000 municipal deputies in russia and several tens of thousands of legislative meetings in the regions there this year, and she is at the front. there are now several hundred thousand people there, that is, in these you can’t send all politicians, you need some jobs if we take away entrepreneurs , where people will return. where will they work, yes, you also voiced such an interesting idea. what about a special economic operation? what is this? what might this be? it has two two sounds the first idea in this economic operation. this is what the government has already done in part, including with the support of the state duma - these are urgent measures that embroider kitov's places, not all bottlenecks are embroidered, but a significant part of the first wave of such responses to western sanctions has already been done, but there is a second strategic thing. yes, it's a static line. you know what the word industrial policy in russia was actually banned for all the nineties, when we gave away our markets in the west to foreign manufacturers. it was not very popular in the 2000s. it was still possible to use it, but nothing was done, and only in 2014-2014 did the industrial policy begin, in one of the areas of the police economy, where it is very important that not some state players, and they began to help private players, removing, firstly, some excessive regulation restrictions, and secondly. come on, grant. giving long-term loans are not very expensive. although also not cheap began to invest. we see how for more than 8 years. yes, reactive participation, there is dmitry mikhailovich pattershev, who, of course, put his reputation on the line. yes, first as the head of the russian agricultural bank, then as a minister well, many other colleagues worked, government writers. we see how it's an industry. it became one of these locomotives for the development of russia in tsarist russia was bread, but it went abroad, and the peasants were starving. maybe you remember such an expression not then in russia there was a famine, when the grain was born to him? yes, he had bread. and when was libidonia born? yes, that’s how it was in soviet times, no matter how much collective farms poured into these state-owned ones, we bought grain in america and so on. now we sell grain for export. and this is very important. this industrial policy is called and when we are not in a state-owned company swell money. and when we give them to the private sector, how do these support to private money. we give the state at this moment development begins. and so, her dear hunter recently, her exchange informant conducted an experiment, supported them with 500 million rubles. for advertising, yes for consumer goods. so it's not enough to compete with the price, even if the quality is the same, that is, it's professionally lower, which means less profit less taxes you pay. support for subsidized advertising and succeeded, that the channels that now receive 40 billion tv channels of money directly from the budget and other media per ruble of spending account for a ruble of budget funds. the same money works once, in the case of this experiment , money works twice, a ruble of state money comes in. another ruble of private money and the channel turns out to be not 100 rubles. yes, 200. it's much more efficient. that is, you spend less government money on this and the special economic operation is to help our producers by leading industrial policy, firstly, and second, what is industrial policy. it is always protectionism the whole west england germany france the usa all rose on protectionism. they've been defending their markets for hundreds of years. moreover, they're happy to defend all this talk about free markets. look usa china trade wars usa europe we'll still live. under wto rules under this burden. why you need it? let's reset. let's enter the minimum. mirror duty, under it up to 35%. after all, here is even one small industry. leading, there in six countries, five anglo-saxon countries and increased duties in poland. already the budget will be 4 billion rubles. and more this year they can be spent on supporting the industry, because in order to support the industry, this is exactly the place where you can take this money and send half to support our specialty areas, and half to support the industry. i think it's a very good move and i've seen it. i saw yesterday that all parties have a lot of support for this idea, right? well, yesterday they also talked about the budget. uh, last year's budget deficit, but it turned out much more than planned. clearly two trillion. yes, objective reasons. and what, in your opinion, will happen with this adopted budget for 2023, what awaits it? i would have noted something here back in december at the beginning of december, the ministry of finance, the government thought that medicine would be 1.3 trillion rubles, one point three tenths of a trillion rubles. it turned out to be 3:3 only a month passed this word . it turned out to be this. it turned out that a very short period of time turned out when the budget was adopted in november, for example, a year ago, when this budget was adopted in the twenty-second year, i said no will. they also plan a surplus, that is, an excess of the budget. there will be no surplus for a trillion of such a colleague. yes, and we see a trillion when the budget is adopted, 23 years. let's reduce costs, we won't have that surplus of the deficit that is planned for 23, it will be higher, because the price of oil was calculated at 75-80 dollars per barrel, we see now the price is 40 there are five letters, if therefore revenues will be lower, so there are two options, either to borrow more, like it is the ussr yes, in the late eighties everything was there anyway you can do it on that side, we'll lose. and you can cut costs. yes, a cap. yes, that's it and so on, and i'm a supporter and borrow, but limited and cut costs. for example, we still have subsidies in the budget to support automakers according to the euro-4 standard. in principle, we have with the automotive industry. you know, yes, i know, here, and then there's euro-4. we want to support, but it's just to say something game, like a cop already. yes, this is not only the pre-war budget. it 's kind of a deco budget. we continue new construction sites. yes, those lines that started the road. yes, there the building needs to be completed. do you want that in russia there is this unfinished? let's finish building what you started thinking, we want to build a new part. right now we want to make a road from yekaterinburg to tyumen, maybe we'll wait, we're building it. well, let me tell you straight out, we are building new houses in new territories. where did they get hurt? yes, they told me one house. it's just that 300 million people built a house, ukrainian rockets flew in. no house no 300 million rubles. ugh, good thing no one got hurt residents, but why, but nevertheless, first everything, then we will build. well, if we are serious, but ah, there is still such a thing as economic mobilization. it is clear that they have indicated, yes, that the economy of money, in principle, is not enough and here and there, yes, but does this mobilization economy really need it, what does it mean that here you need to pay attention and not friendly countries need it ukraine now, if now russia would make the economy from peaceful flights to a mobilization flight, this would be the best gift to our opponents. so i think those people who are here, but i will explain. yes, we have two parts of the economy, a state-owned such a state-owned company and such a classic state-owned company. there is a market part of the economy. and it is in these two halves that the half of this chamber is better thanks to, and we just kept this one on these sanctions that the west arranged for us in the spring of last year. if now we have this, as it were, from the fact that we are now a chocolate factory. let's translate to the fact that she will make cartridges, and this assumes induction economy. i don't know what i'm good at, if it's cool to sew clothes for people, we'll sew. we just don't need to. so many military uniforms. we need a military uniform. even we didn’t have naked mobilized there, but we don’t need so many hundreds of thousands, it makes no sense to transfer the entire industry to a war footing. it doesn't make any sense. the more market economy remains. yes, with a protectionist policy supported by it. the more us jobs you get more income and people. but medicine savings with this people will get less work and less freedom, and they want to cause this, of course it won't. she will not sausage, of course, this will lead to riots. uh-huh , therefore, only either people are narrow-minded, or people. well, that is, poorly educated or externally far from the economy, so to speak, at least unconditionally arrange the economy in russia, or this is an enemy. here it turns out, after all, there must be some kind of balance, yes, not a mobilization economy, but nevertheless, an economy defined with nuances, taking into account the situation, the dream has two meanings about psychological. here people are mobilized. they are collected. they are collected. they are active in this sense, psychologically one must be mobilized, of course. you don’t have to be relaxed there, you know how emel is not there on the stove, you have to be. of course, you need to be collected in this sense, turquoise is good, but they also have a transition to military rails. here, we don't need so much. um, so, those enterprises that make ammunition for weapons. there's how to ensure this so they work three shifts. i say, there is no need for a cigarette factory to change. they work, but nevertheless, gaps remain here and the president himself says about this that gaps in components are people who know how to work with us. we have good equipment. it's just that it's hard for us with components from the fact that you still drive 100 bakers to the factory. but no, they did not come, some details. you will not make more equipment and more weapons, so here is the bottleneck in the supply of logistics in spare parts. they are in the number of jobs. there are also questions, but this is not the bottleneck. yes alexey much for your comments. thanks for coming to our studio. let me remind you that in our studio there was a party chairman, new people aleksey nechaev in philip trofimov's studio, carsharing mapped the 2gis service began to display cars available for rent by the minute this information was added. as a separate layer along with traffic jams, exchange rates, attractions and other modes of transport. actually, as part of the transport system, carsharing is supposed to be a graphic service, that is, it is stated as expanding the possibilities for planning a trip, as an addition to walking bikes , scooters, well, or a bus route. in fact, directly in the carshing machine. you will have to use the normal car mode, but, uh, but directly from the map interface you can see where this wallet is. find what kind of car, what kind of service. how much petrol in a tank is the estimated rental price? there is also a book button, but there it will be sent to the application of the corresponding third-pa

alexei nechaev alexei gennadievich hello, i welcome you. well, yesterday the spring session started in the state duma, and you started it with a bill on armor for uh, you called on entrepreneurs to m-m need to protect entrepreneurs from mobilization. why did they start with this bill? and as you can see , entrepreneurs defend a lot in our country , but still the postponement of bookings is different, because we see two such, well, not very good things. first of all , justice in russia is very important for 2.5 million officials. and as he said, the minister of defense mobilized 1,700 officials. this is 0.07%. yes, less than 1/10. he is considered to be a little less than 6 million entrepreneurs in russia. individual entrepreneurs - that's 3 1/2 there and a little over a million. that is, this is 6 million, the community of entrepreneurs, of which , according to the minister of defense, 27,000 are also mobilized, which is almost half a percent. it turns out that there is six times the difference between the need for officials at the front and do you need entrepreneurs. but this, of course, hurts people, because, well, justice is such a delicate moment in russia historically and the second thing. we visit the bill not all entrepreneurs. yes, not all six million give a reservation, but those who have five or more people are working, because i also see now, and we are receiving signals to the committee on small and medium enterprises and just at meetings with voters, what do they say, well, a person was taken away, and he has several employees. and where are they without him, he and the director, he and the owner. there the family can't pick up. well , that is, jobs are important to us , it is important for us that people have jobs and freedom. and when there is nowhere to work, well, how can i say, it's not great, so the bill is for two categories of people, entrepreneurs, whom five employees and more, and also, so that you know there were no frauds, we said. that within six months of tomobilization, these five employees have already worked for you? this is also just a fuse not now, quickly once again, probably finished drawing and the second thing the second option is the category - these are those who have farms, it doesn’t matter. you work there alone, there are employees, because this very sensitive farmers are also people who are few in russia, and they keep a lot of them. there is a large share ours. uh, food, yes, food products are created by agricultural holdings, but farmers are doing the most difficult , most such thankless work and now they are removed. and there are also machine operators there, so they are quite actively taken away from the agricultural regions of this very sensitive category. they will bring more benefits to us. uh, creating jobs, creating taxes, allowing production, a at the front. well, what of them then yes, well, so far this is an initiative. how are you? what kind of response did you hear from the deputies on this idea? calculate when it can become. well he, first of all, uh, and ourselves. i spoke yesterday and said that there are still several categories. it is very sensitive, for example, it specialists in the modern world of digital it technologies are similar to the fact that there were engineers there 100 years ago. this is what the industry is based on, this is the core of the economy as a whole, like engineers. this is the core of the industry here will not work equipment. nothing will happen. we see another second thing, for example, there are not enough at the front, for example, digital battle control systems. yes, how modern are the unators, yes, which they put in ukraine how much it is not modern with us. yes, we won’t comment on it there yet, but there is something to do there, so we didn’t have enough numbers before the start, about a million vacancies to enter the industry were not filled, imagine correctly the ministry of digital is fighting to give reservations to it specialists, but there is still for the sake of the electronic industry, including at the front, it is necessary that people not sit there in the trenches, but here they create smart shells , create an electronic warfare system so that strangers plant it. there these drones thank god now there sevastopol, for example, also intercepted. there are more than twenty of these e, drones that flew, but all this is required by modern e brains of modern hands, and the third category. that is, we say it people for the sake of electronics engineers, yes, engineers have changed a lot in 100 years, but engineers also rely on them for all technologists, because many processes there are chemistry in the same food technology. well, the quality can go like that, maybe, god forbid, we poison someone. there's something else that's very sensitive, so this is also waiting for its own contributions, but we must eat the elephant in parts, we must act step by step, and here we are, including deputies from other factions in the debate, we see support from the liberal democratic party, and so the colleagues of fair russia there united russia therefore need to be discussed at the duma committee, we are campaigning. how to say we justify this , we weigh where there is more benefit, of course. eh, this is a cold word, too, people say. and why don't these ones go, and these ones go there, they have their own, too, such delicate moments. this should be discussed if society decides that they more useful here you say jobs money entrepreneurs, so support, but this is a big discussion, it already started yesterday. well, yes, the controversy was really serious there. here vyacheslav volodin said that, in fact, everyone should serve and that there is even an idea not to let those who did not serve in the army into the civil service, how do you feel about this, by the way ? well, as i said, for now, for example, from the civil service. i say 6 times less people mobilized to do something, so here it is necessary, but, firstly, in the words of vyacheslav volodin as a person, and such a deep one is a rational grain. yes, that is, this is not an idea from scratch, as if what he says, do you want to serve in the public service, served in the army. there is logic in this, but many questions are not answered, they probably have answers, but do not require public discussion either. well, for example , a woman to go to public services. we have almost half of the civil servants, a little less than a woman, in order to become civil servants, they must also serve in the army, as in israel, for example, or like switzerland, yes, or a woman, like men can only serve in the army, but women can in any case, here’s how we think about it as a representative this question, the second second big point. we have, for example, disabled people. yes, people, we have several people in the state duma, people are very uh, good people are substantial they are someone in a wheelchair there. yes, someone is also there, uh, and they uh still bring great benefits anyway. there it doesn't matter united russia or where from, because people, uh, know the problems, for example, people, uh, with disabilities. we have several million of them in the country. that is, this is a huge category of our uh people, you understand? they did not serve in the army, so what is not their place in the state duma is considered to be a shield. volodya i don’t think he thinks so, if we make exceptions, that is, these are still questions, but in the end there is a constitution the constitution gives both active electoral rights the right to elect, and passive the right to be elected to all citizens, therefore a person , if we have already decided on our attitude to the constitution, of course, we have agreed - our colleagues voted for it last season, but in the last convocation there are many questions here. i didn’t cut it right in the heat of the moment, of course, they require a detailed discussion. you probably already mentioned that the delay for entrepreneurs is one of the ways to support. e economy saving economy jobs. yes, you said annoying. here we are , the party, realized, is returning, says, here we will take 200,000 municipal deputies in russia into politics and several tens of thousands of registry offices meeting of the regions there this year, while she is at the front. there are now several hundred thousand people there, that is, you can’t send politicians to all of them, of course, we will take some jobs, of course, we will take entrepreneurs. where will people return? where will they work? you also voiced such an interesting idea. what about a special economic operation? what is it? what might this be? this has two uh, two two sounds, the first idea in this economic operation is what the government has already kind of done, including including with the support of the state duma, these are urgent measures that open up kitov's places, not all bottlenecks are opened, but a significant part in the first wave of such responses to western sanctions has already been done, but there is a second strategic thing. yes, it's a static line. you know that the word " industrial policy" in russia was actually banned in the 1990s, when we gave our western markets to foreign manufacturers. it was not very popular in 2000. it could still be used, but nothing was done and only since 2014, industrial policy has begun in one of the areas in the russian economy, where it is very important that they began to help not some state players, but frequent players, removing, firstly, some excessive regulation restrictions, and secondly, come on subsidy. giving long-term loans are not very expensive, although they also began to invest not cheap. we see how for 8,000 years. yes , dmitry nikolaevich’s reactive participation there , who, of course, put his reputation on the line. yes, first as the head of the russian agricultural bank then as minister well, and many other colleagues worked as writers. we see how this is an industry. it became one of such locomotives for the development of russia in tsarist russia was bread, but it went abroad, and the peasants were starving. maybe you remember such an expression not then in russia there was a famine, when the grain was born to him? yes , he had bread. and when the swan, it seems, was not born. yes, that’s how it was in soviet times, no matter how much collective farms poured into these state-owned ones, we bought grain in america and so on. now we sell grain for export. and this is very important. this is called industrial policy, and when we are not in a state-owned company, we swell money. and when we give them to the private sector, where is the support for private money. we give the state at this moment development begins, and here one of the industries recently exchanged an informant conducted an experiment, supported them with 500 million rubles. for advertising, but for consumer goods, it is not enough to compete with the price, even if the quality is the same, that is, it is professionally lower, which means that you pay less taxes further profit. uh, support for subsidized advertising, and it turned out that the channels that now receive 40 billion tv channels of money directly avoided other media , a ruble of budget funds accounts for a ruble of expenses. the same money works once, in the case of this experiment, money works twice, a ruble of state money comes in. another ruble of private money and the channel turns out to be not 100 rubles. yes, 200. it's much more efficient. that is, you spend less government money on this and a special economic operation is to help to our manufacturers by pursuing industrial policy, firstly, and secondly, what is industrial policy. it's always protectionism the whole west england germany france the us has all risen on pro-controlism. they've been defending their markets for hundreds of years. moreover, they're happy to defend all this talk about free markets. look at the us china trade wars us europe is friendly, as it were, us trade wars. what they have now done with entire russian industries, they have banned the supply of steel there. well, there are a lot of them our goods, both branded and non -branded, were forbidden to stand up to you. and we bring it all here. uh, for those pistons that we once had the wto more than ten years ago is no longer so active. yes, because there are certain restrictions. you know almost the same, but now. yes, i would look at the balance. ah, export. we have not greatly reduced the import of goods, including yes, yes, yes, there is a share, well, this is all the main flow comes from the west and the duties have remained the same 5%, 10%, 15 that were once imposed on time, while our unfriendly countries. us they simply raised duties to 35. otherwise, they simply removed an entire industry. and we still live according to wto rules under this burden. why you need it? let's reset. let's enter the minimum. mirror duty, raise up to 35%. after all, here is even one small industry. leading, there are increased duties on six countries, five anglo-saxon countries and poland. already the budget will be 4 billion rubles. and more this year they can be spent on supporting the industry, because in order to support the industry, how this is the place where you can take this money and send half to support our social sphere, and half to support the industry. it seems to me that this is a very good move and i have not seen it. i saw yesterday that all parties have a lot of support for this idea, right? well, yesterday they also talked about the budget. uh, the budget deficit last year, but it turned out to be much larger than planned. clearly two trillion. yes, objective reasons. and what, in your opinion, will happen with this adopted budget for 2023, what awaits it? i went here tagged back in deca's in early december, the ministry of finance of the government thought that the deficit would be 1.3 million rubles. one comma three tenths of a trillion rubles, it turned out to be 3:33 in just a month passed the word of honour. it turned out to be. it turned out to be a very short period of time when the budgets were adopted in november a year ago, when the budget for the twenty-second year was adopted. i said it won't. they will fly by, that is, an excess budget for a trillion colleagues will not be a deficit. yes, and we see, now it’s really more than three trillion, when this budget was adopted, 23 years, they say, let’s reduce our costs there will be no surplus of the deficit that is planned for 23, it will be more, because oil prices were calculated at 75-80 dollars per barrel, we see now the price of 40 there, god forbid, if therefore incomes will be lower, so there are two options, or borrow more, as the ussr did. yes, at the end of the eighties, everything can be done there anyway, that we will lose the country. and you can cut costs. yes, as it were, sow a hat, yes, and so on, her supporter and borrow, but are limited and reduce costs. for example, we still have in the budget subsidies to support automakers under the euro-4 standard. in principle, we have a relationship with the automotive industry. you know, yes, i know, here, and then there's the euro-4. we want to support it. well, it's just to say somewhere game, like a cop already. yes, this is not only the pre-war budget or some kind of dekovy budget. we continue with new construction. yes, those lines that started the road. yes, there the building needs to be completed. do you want that in russia there is this unfinished? let's finish what we started, but we want to build a new part. now we want to make a road from yekaterinburg to tyumen can wait, we are building. well, let me tell you straight out, we are building new houses in new territories. where did they get hurt? yes , they told me one house. it's just that 300 million built a house, ukrainian rockets flew in, there is no house and no 300 million rubles. uh-huh, it's good that no one was hurt by the inhabitants, but why, but nevertheless , first everything, then we will build. well , if we are serious, but ah, there is still such a thing as economic mobilization. it is clear that they indicated, but money, in principle, is not enough and here and there, yes, but does this mobilization economy really need it, what does it mean that unfriendly countries need to pay attention here, ukraine needs it if now russia would make the economy from peaceful flights to mobilization rails, this is leading the best gift to our opponents. so i think those people who are here, but i will explain. yes, we have two parts of the economy, the state is such a state company and such classics state companies have a market part economy. and it is in these two halves that the half of this night is better thanks to, and we just kept this one on these sanctions that the west arranged for us in the spring of last year. and now we have this here because we are now a chocolate factory. let's translate to the fact that she will make cartridges, and this assumes an induction economy. i don't know what will be good. yes, if it's cool that we sew clothes for people, we will sew. we just don't need to. so many military uniforms. we need a military uniform. even we didn't have mobilized there naked, but we didn't need it. that's hundreds of thousands. it makes no sense to transfer the entire industry to a military footing. it doesn't make any sense. the more market economy remains. yes, with protectionist policies supported by it, the more jobs we have, the more income and people. but the sleepless economy, because people will get less work and less freedom, and they want to cause this, of course, there will be no paper. she will not sausage, of course, this will lead to riots. uh-huh, therefore, only either people are narrow-minded, or people. well, that is poorly educated or external far far from the economy, so to speak , to arrange investment economies in russia, or it is an enemy. well, it turns out here, after all, there must be some kind of balance, yes, not a mobilization economy, but nevertheless, an economy defined with nuances, taking into account the situation, a dream has two psychological meanings. here people are mobilized. they are collected. they are collected. they are active in this sense, psychologically one must be mobilized, of course. no need to be relaxed there, you know how emelya is on there is no stove, there must be. of course, you need to be collected in this sense, turquoise is good, but they also have a transition to military rails. here, this is superfluous we do not need so much, but so those enterprises that make ammunition for weapons, there ensuring that they work like three shifts. i say, there is no need for a cigarette factory to shift. they work, but nevertheless there are gaps here and the president himself says about this that people in our country know how to work with components. we have good equipment. it's just hard for us with accessories from what you still drive 100 bakers per factory. but no, they did not come, some details. you will not make more equipment and more weapons, so here is the bottleneck in the supply of logistics in spare parts. they are in the number of jobs . there are also questions, but this is not the bottleneck. yes alex means, thank you very much for your comments. thanks for coming to our studio. let me remind you that in our studio there was a party chairman, new people alexeimatter. it will be the honest detective. always wondering what's up starts? now you will see everything. manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check. i greet everyone who has joined us with you program conduct duty unit i am andrey ivlev, moscow region, former prosecutor of the ramensky district. konstantin tambulov, he was accused under several articles at once of fraud, taking a bribe and extortion on an especially large scale about how the deeds of the former prosecutor became the basis of the criminal case alexander the career of the former prosecutor of the ramensky district of the moscow region konstantin tambulov, accused of a series of multimillion-dollar scams, ended ingloriously on the bench, the defendants' relatives, on whom he so actively rewrote property, probably support him at a distance. they didn't even come to court. but this did not seem to upset mr. tambulov, he had enough attention from journalists. announcement of sentences in t

now let's talk with the chairman of the party alexei nechaev alexei gennadievich hello, i welcome youll, yesterday the spring session started in the state duma, and you started it with a bill on armor for, uh, entrepreneurs, you called for the fact that hmm entrepreneurs need to be protected from mobilization. why did they start with this bill? and as you can see , entrepreneurs defend a lot in our country , but still a delay. yes, it's different because we're seeing two of these, uh, not-so- good things. first , justice is very important in russia, for example, there are 2.5 million officials in russia. and as he said, the minister of defense mobilized 1,700 officials. this is 0.7%. yes, less than one tenth of andrew entrepreneurs. in russia, it is considered a little less than 6 million. of these, those who made the enterprise are two and a half millions, and those who are entrepreneurs in detail are 3.5 and a little more than a million. that is, this is 6 million, the community of entrepreneurs of them is also mobilized according to the minister of defense 27.000 is almost half a p

now let's talk with party chairman alexei nechaev alexei gennadievich hello, welcome to the state dumahe spring session has started, and you started it with a bill on armor for, uh, entrepreneurs, you called for the fact that hmm entrepreneurs need to be protected from mobilization. why it was with this bill that they began and as you can see , there are many entrepreneurs in our country still defend the delay, it's different, because we see two such, uh, not very good things. first, after all , justice is very important in russia, which in russia has 2 1/2 million officials. and as he said, the minister of defense mobilized 1,700 officials. this is 0.07%. yes, less than one tenth of andrew entrepreneurs. in russia, it is considered a little less than 6 million. of these, those who made enterprises are about two and a half. there are millions, and those who are individual entrepreneurs are 3.5 a little more than a million. that is, this is 6 million, the community of entrepreneurs of them mobilized also according to the minister of defense 27.000. it's almost half a percent. it turns o

now let's talk with the chairman of the party alexei nechaev alexei gennadievich hello, i welcome you state duma spring session started, and you started it with a bill on armor for uh, entrepreneurs, you called for the fact that hmm , entrepreneurs need to be protected from mobilization. why did we start with this bill? and as you can see , there are many entrepreneurs in our country who still defend the postponement of bookings, this is different, because we see two such, well, not very good things. first , the justice of the heroes of russia, 2.5 million officials, is very important in russia. and as he said, the minister of defense mobilized 1,700 officials. this is 0.07%. yes less than 0.03 entrepreneurs. in russia, it is considered a little less than 6 million. of these, those who made enterprises are about two and a half. there are millions, and those who are detailed entrepreneurs are 3.5 a little more than a million. that is, this is 6 million, the community of entrepreneurs has also mobilized 27,000 of them, according to the minister of defense. it's almost half a percent. it

now let's talk with alexei gennadievich, chairman of the party, alexei nechaev hello, welcome to thesession has started, and you started it with a bill on armor for, uh, entrepreneurs, you called for the fact that entrepreneurs need to be protected from mobilization. why did they start with this bill? and as you see it , entrepreneurs, you defend a lot in our country , but still a delay.