i is, sam, as so invested in this conflict, they dismissed diplomacy as the president boulden has perpetrated and sponsored and ordered by his military atrocities, war crimes make him unsuitable for any kind of a conversation between you can see it as st. harrison is not looking like the russian political regime as sar going to collapse in the near future. ah, and so why not talk about diplomacy? it also speaks to the role that the media unfortunately has played throughout this, which is the egg on the bottom. the administration to be more aggressive, more escal, tory, to get deeper involved in the conflict. what about offensive weapons? i mean being able to disrupt intercept, shoot down. russian incoming is one thing, but we know the ukrainians wants advanced rocket systems grants. a lot of the use coverage on this was taken on some of the worst characteristics of cold war and warning. i'm, by the way, how did the cold war and the ended through years of knob decades of talks. the cold war made us realize the importance of talking to one's adversary to one's enemy, especially at that adversar