speak to international attorney klein press than mr. preston. you're most welcome to the program. are you surprised? we've heard this dissenting voice in congress about the delivery of the tanks. no, at all. no, not at all. i think the delivery, the tanks, change the dynamics of the united states involvement in this conflict. and pushes us closer to the red line that the kremlin has spoken of and very well may change the relationship of the united states to russia with respect to this conflict. because, you know, at some point our country becomes less than 8 or, or a better. so ukraine and more of a, an active participant, and that is really the dangerous step with the supply of these abrams tanks. no. the, the republicans control the heis of representatives. do you think we'll hear more voices coming forward to question the, the continued weapon supplies and the huge cost above as well to keep? well, we absolutely will. you'll hear more from marjorie taylor green turner. great. you'll also hear from andy ogles, from tennessee. you also hear from tim burchett from the eastern part

at his 15th attempt, international attorney klein, preston says having ukrainian troops on us soil could pose a risk for locals. we have no business being involved to this degree or at all frankly in, in ukraine and the cost to americans, civilians and american citizens can be great. particularly if this conflict becomes a hot conflict between dom rush in the united states. you know, maybe sen, dams, resolution would have gotten more support to you just put in the resolution that oklahoma refuses to support nazi's. ah, you know this regime, these are battalion people the right sector and all the been dera on hold over that are in ukraine to day. you know, ironically our support for them is, is really of a disgrace. let's face ukraine is the most corrupt regime in europe today, and it has been prolonged. there's no democracy there and they're looking for anyway because they're desperate in my view is very dangerous to have them on us soil training. i'm in oklahoma and i think senator nathan dom was correct and his very bold resolution that he proposed and those were the hour's top stories

i think senator nathan dom was correct in his very bold resolution that he proposed this wish klein preston international attorney. thank you very much for your input. thank you . ah, the u. k. should get rid of its colonial mindset. that's the message from china's foreign ministry. which latch out at london's recent report criticising beijing's policy on hong kong journal with regular hong kong has long been returned to china . and hong kong affairs are purely the internal affairs of china, which allow no room for foreign interference. we urge the u. k. to recognize reality. trends let go of its colonial mindset and respect china's sovereignty and unity. the u. k. government report claims. freedoms are being eroded by the chinese government in hong kong, alleging authorities systematically cracked down on free speech. hong kong was handed over to china by the u. k. back in 1997. the city was guaranteed a high degree of autonomy and freedom of speech under a principle of one country to systems than in 2020 beijing imposed a national security law to punish terrorism treason and the virgin, w

preston? >> thank you, chair fielder and thank you to mr. klein and fielder for the work on this and the presentation. i am curious about if you can expand a little on the comments around the cpu c not having -- not consistentsly auditing the districts. and i just wondering -- and that also include the high risk areas, what response if any was provided on this? is that lack of resources is that they claimed do those. or other form of methodology there is a method to the approach? what did you get back from them? explaining that? >> so it has been awhile sings the audit. >> i do, absolutely. thank you. the cpu c maintained that they did have a process by which they evaluated. they were unable to demonstrate that to us. so when we ask for that documentation to show how they would designate high risk and prioritize the auditing they were unable to provide that for us. that's why we recommended to the legislator directly for thome prioritize districts. >> and just i 19unable or unwilling? i'm were they claiming a proprietary or other thing they were b

preston? >> thank you, chair fielder and thank you to mr. kleinielder for the work on this and the presentation. i am curious about if you can expand a little on the comments around the cpu c not having -- not consistentsly auditing the districts. and i just wondering -- and that also include the high risk areas, what response if any was provided on this? is that lack of resources is that they claimed do those. or other form of methodology there is a method to the approach? what did you get back from them? explaining that? >> so it has been awhile sings the audit. >> i do, absolutely. thank you. the cpu c maintained that they did have a process by which they evaluated. they were unable to demonstrate that to us. so when we ask for that documentation to show how they would designate high risk and prioritize the auditing they were unable to provide that for us. that's why we recommended to the legislator directly for thome prioritize districts. >> and just i 19unable or unwilling? i'm were they claiming a proprietary or other thing they were barod a

preston? >> thank you, chair fielder and thank you to mr. klein and fielder for the work on this and the presentation. i am curious about if you can expand a little on the comments around the cpu c not having -- not consistentsly auditing the districts. and i just wondering -- and that also include the high risk areas, what response if any was provided on this? is that lack of resources is that they claimed do those. or other form of methodology there is a method to the approach? what did you get back from them? explaining that? >> so it has been awhile sings the audit. >> i do, absolutely. thank you. the cpu c maintained that they did have a process by which they evaluated. they were unable to demonstrate that to us. so when we ask for that documentation to show how they would designate high risk and prioritize the auditing they were unable to provide that for us. that's why we recommended to the legislator directly for thome prioritize districts. >> and just i 19unable or unwilling? i'm were they claiming a proprietary or other thing they were b

preston? >> thank you, chair fielder and thank you to mr. kleiner for the work on this and the presentation. i am curious about if you can expand a little on the comments around the cpu c not having -- not consistentsly auditing the districts. and i just wondering -- and that also include the high risk areas, what response if any was provided on this? is that lack of resources is that they claimed do those. or other form of methodology there is a method to the approach? what did you get back from them? explaining that? >> so it has been awhile sings the audit. >> i do, absolutely. thank you. the cpu c maintained that they did have a process by which they evaluated. they were unable to demonstrate that to us. so when we ask for that documentation to show how they would designate high risk and prioritize the auditing they were unable to provide that for us. that's why we recommended to the legislator directly for thome prioritize districts. >> and just i 19unable or unwilling? i'm were they claiming a proprietary or other thing they were barod a pri