grigory karasin grigory borisovich greetings. good afternoon. good afternoon dmitry good afternoon. and i understand correctly that we, like uh, a few years ago, such a situation developed in the same way, we approached the line when hmm, the united states, before that, uh, with his own hand, came up with something for himself that did not fit into the agreement on hmm strategic offensive weapons, and now they are trying to make a good mino with a bad game. they say that they are sorry and say that a dangerous situation is being created. well, first of all, i must say that it is not the first year that the russian federation ratified the start in 2011 for the first time, then we ratified it again in 2021, and that’s it. during this time, all the conditions stipulated in the treaty relating to strategic offensive weapons were strictly and clearly observed. nuclear states nato state i mean, first of all great britain france is not included. eh, understanding. hey, this document. this is already a free interpretation of what is, and therefore, in short, we need it. and clarity and clarity, so we did not come out. uh, the president of the russian federation spoke about this, we are not going out. uh, from this treaty. we suspend our membership in order to understand the partner. uh, get an appropriate explanation to return to the escons the roots of this and the agreement. and then perhaps, uh, all these so say the provisions that have already been agreed upon again, er, will be valid. that's roughly speaking, meaning known number of warheads. the number of carriers is known. i will not clutter up the air with numbers here, i will say that i will repeat once again that the situation is quite dangerous when, against the background of the united states’ statement that they want to defeat russia on the battlefield or will contribute to this through their e, ukrainian e, prestigious e, we want to understand the degree of fidelity to the agreement, uh, on the part of washington in this essence of our positions, and grigoryich, uh, again, if i understand correctly, then the treaty on strategic offensive arms that is supposed to be in the future, but should again, judging by the speech of vladimir putin, uh, before the federal assembly, include u with others nuclear countries. so you mentioned france and great britain, which are not included in the previous treaty, but they have nuclear weapons, but now in this arms race, or something, they act as a united front in the united states, it turns out the fact is that the united states arbitrarily expanded the scope of these our agreements to, e, strange nuclear countries nato france england we have two lips. this agreement is purely bilateral treaties, we proceed from this, if we are talking about something else, then we need to sit down at the table and again , uh, negotiate from the very beginning to exchange information and jump some points of contact, without this uh, dark observance of such an important treaty is meaningless and very dangerous. grigory b

grigory karasin , grigory borisovich, is in direct contact with us. greetings, good afternoon. hello. hello. this is how symbolic it turns out that both russia and china are simultaneously sent to the united states, yes, and to the entire world community such here. uh, the joint momentum comes out right . i just didn't hear what you were talking about, right? about the northern streams, respectively, that the elite stream. the most important thing is that the rejection of such criminal actions by uh the united states and other state nato uh, is a very obvious fact of a and february 22. u, at the request of russia , this issue will be heard at the un security council but seymour serge or one of his mean associates will report to the meeting of the security council and appropriate decisions will be made. it is clear that our representative will not remain silent. let's see how the other members of the security council approach this. here's another fact. and what further e consequences can be expected? yes, this process. subsequently , an important communication e, so to speak, gas tank- gas oil, forming the structure, has already been clearly violated. uh, so appetites can grow, by the way, speaking, i would remember that yesterday there was a meeting of nato defense ministers and there was one. judging by the official report, one of the topics was hmm just an underwater topic, e.g. underwater structures. i do not rule out that there the expansion has touched both this and this sector. uh, how about our life with you, uh, but the important thing is that the security council will listen to this and it is also important that the world will be heard at the top. you can tell the level of our arguments and facts that will accompany the emulation report or the representative of that meeting of defense ministers nato countries which took place in brussels the day before. how can you characterize today the involvement of nato in the conflict in ukraine well, i think that it is not necessary to spend a lot of words here. expansion. nato continues. uh, so, uh, the nato minister of defense is not left alone, not only ukraine . naturally, they will continue to sell it for the supply of modern weapons, which are already taking the lives of thousands of people who are participating in hostilities. uh, well, the ukrainian territory and the new regions of russia means, apart from that, it was accepted. so-called new concept of military planning. i can guess what it consists of, but it's for sure. er, the concept of further expansion of nato is not accidental , the document mentions georgia and moldova as those countries with which it is necessary to intensify, e, interaction in order to involve them in the nato structure. uh, and curiously , the minister of defense tore down their characteristic diplomacy began in quotation marks , of course, launched an attack on uh, turkey uh, pressing uh means on the turkish minister of defense and on the turkish leadership so that so that they do not prevent sweden and finland from joining the bloc on this as you know the topic, uh, it has received publicity and continues, uh, to remain a topical word. i'm no good. e from the meeting, but the international community did not receive, except for the growth of concern about such activity of the military-political bloc. grigoryisovich, about turkey , by the way, you don’t link just the fact that this issue is being raised in nato right now, when, uh, the turkish republic, well, it’s due to the fact that there were devastating earthquakes, which there whole cities have destroyed a very vulnerable position. i agree with you, er, for sure, such a semantic linkage. no , i don’t know if it was said or not, but the subtext in e. you see, it is obvious that turkey's western partners in nato want to take advantage of the huge tragedies of problems. turkey in order to force, uh, make the decision you need, but i’m not talking about ukraine, which , in its condolences, you know, wrote a very cynical thing that we are there condolences to turkey , but we believe that after uh restoration. so she will continue to help ukraine, this is the height of cynicism and illiteracy in the preparation of such documents. but this is so, and by the way, i remembered drinking, that's why life , uh, poses new tasks for us and for turk