it doesn't say anything about how much they made and in the case of somebody like jane roberts or in work for firms that operate on commissions they don't have to disclose clients. when you look at 2016, 2017, disclosures from john roberts it lists the firm, major lindsey, that jane roberts worked for. doesn't say wilmer hail was a client that paid her. so the person bringing this lawsuit and sent this letter to congress has an ax to grind bringing a wrongful termination suit, but what he's saying is true john roberts should have to disclose on her behalf the clients paying her since they're the firms appearing before him at the supreme court. >> i want to just put out there the stories that have made news about the supreme court lately. things we've called on you for. ginni thomas lobbying mark meadows, the text messages revealed by the january 6th committee. as well as stories written in "the washington post," where she wrote emails for them to overturn the results of the arizona election. i think there was another state. clarence thomas turning out to be the only justice to side w

yes, chief justice roberts wife, jane sullivan roberts who left the law firm when her husband becamee has been making millions of dollars placing in commissions, placing lawyers at firms, some of which have business before the supreme court. i think it is pretty obvious that the supreme court cares nothing about ethics. we've got ginni thomas who called for biden to be impeached during the january 6 insurrection that took place. i don't know. i'm really discouraged. i think that this kind of stacking and placement of your kind of people, it is a power grab that i'm absolutely disgusted with. and the very fact that the supreme court makes our laws and clarifies our laws and yet they are just a dark and not ethical judicial part of our government, i'm disgusted with it. host: i got your point. here's a story from the new york times from the reporting from yesterday at the supreme court's ethics question. there were a thousand business times that chief justice wife jane sullivan roberts -- some of this before court, letters sent to congress claim that make present a kong -- conflict of

lincoln represented a kentucky master, robert matzen, who was keeping jane bryant and her children in slavery in, the supposedly free state of illinois, lincoln argued that manson was permitted to keep slaves temporarily in illinois, even though jane bryant had been in illinois more than two years at the time of court case. the court pretty quickly rejected lincoln's argument and declared jane free. now, some of lincoln's biographers literally do not mention the mattson case and some of them try to excuse lincoln with a long story about how he'd already agreed to represent the other side, a story which i think is on late 19th century sources, quite questionable and, some of them more recently, however, have said, look, lincoln shouldn't have agreed to take the case. i agree. a lawyer. and as said, i started life as a. a lawyer does not have to take. every client who walks through his door chase his friends made remarkable in political anti-slavery. the 1840s. as i mentioned the 1840 presidential election about a third of 1% vote for the liberty party candidate in 1844. they get that p

jane dougall, bbc news. we're joined now by two referees — teenagerjoe lynch, and robert vas, who's been a match official forold. i have been doing it. being a referee? qualified at 14 . years old. i have been doing it four years. i am years old. i have been doing it four years. iam now 18. i have been insulted refereeing. i have been abused by parents, spectators, coaches and threatened by players. it is something that happens on a regular basis. it is something that happens on a regular basis-— it is something that happens on a regular basis. how on earth do you tolerate that? _ regular basis. how on earth do you tolerate that? at _ regular basis. how on earth do you tolerate that? at the _ regular basis. how on earth do you tolerate that? at the start - regular basis. how on earth do you tolerate that? at the start you - regular basis. how on earth do you tolerate that? at the start you see | tolerate that? at the start you see it as a potential— tolerate that? at the start you see it as a potential career, _ tolerate that? at the start you see it as a potential career, people - it as a potential career,