council of justice was still ongoing, we visited oleksandr sasevich at work at the lviv district administrative courthe promised to answer all our questions and scheduled an interview tomorrow, if it is convenient for you, we will watch here tomorrow at 11:00, however. the next day oleksandr sasevich canceled the meeting and no longer answered the calls of our journalists. and this is the new member of the high council of justice, olga popikova . in 2020, she gave someone more than 5 and a half million hryvnias , which is 2.5 times more than all her savings . she manages to share her salary with her colleagues. assistant secretaries of such a secret, judge popikova is also distinguished by her forgetfulness for several years, she forgot to indicate in the declaration that she uses her father's apartment in kyiv, and in 2019 she became the owner of 83 m² in the capital. she did not declare the value of the real estate according to the information of the de jure foundation as of july 2022 the cost of a similar apartment in the same building is from $179,000. evaluate these words without any detailed be

this is a new member of the high council of justice oleksandr sasevich, a judge of the lviv district administrative courting to journalists, in 2018 he participated in a meeting where candidates for the high council of justice from the congress were agreed in advance of judges this obviously does not correspond to the principles of selection for positions and undermines trust in independence , the expert of the center against and corruption halyna chyzhik oleksandr sisevicha told our journalists the question of his role in these mafia judicial shenanigans, journalists running with information recorded with their cameras how sisevich, together with other judges, participated in one of these secret meetings in the premises of the higher administrative court, where this issue was discussed. sisevich left the meeting last together with the infamous judge of the district administration of kyiv, bohdan sanin, and even got into the same car with him, all this, you were also noticed in the incredible manipulation of the declaration of property, in particular, most likely , he deliberately understated the price o

is a new member of the high council of justice, oleksandr sasevich, a judge of the lviv district administrative courtrding to journalists, in 2018, he participated in a meeting where in advance candidates for the supreme council of justice agreed on the departure of judges. this obviously does not comply with the principles of selection for positions and undermines trust in independence, center and corruption expert halyna chyzhik told our journalists. oleksandr sisyevicha also has questions about his role in these mafia-like judicial shenanigans, bigus-info journalists recorded with his cameras as a system or together with other judges participated in one of these secret meetings in the premises of the higher administrative court where this issue was discussed, cesevich was the last to leave the meeting together with the infamous judge of the district administration of kyiv, bohdan sanin, and even sat in the same car with him, all this , you were also noticed and the incredible manipulation with the declaration of property, in particular, most likely deliberately understated the price of your suzuki

was partially satisfied, mainly in the yavoriv district, the court of the lviv region dated december 7, 2022, on the arrest atoshnyk to the administrative responsibility of vladyslav anatoliyovych, an atrosh woman, to be considered guilty of the administrative offenses provided for in part one and part two of article 172 with the symbol seven of the code of ukraine on administrative offenses with the imposition of an administrative fine. this decision demonstrates that ukraine is only trying to become a european country . the big question is whether it is is there objective and impartial justice in ukraine? is there selective justice? everyone must draw their own conclusions, and it is obvious in my person that the attack on the local self-government voted for patroshchenko, more than 70% of the citizens of chernihiv, he was one of those heroes who stopped the citizens of zaporozhye from zaporozhye when he was passing through chernihiv. in order to once again intimidate the entire local self-government, the commander of the combined forces serhiy naev visited the wounded defenders in the northern operational zone, the lieutenant general

of the trosheka woman, the decision of the yavoriv district court of the lviv region dated december 7 , 2022 to bring the atoshnik to the administrative responsibility of the trosheka woman vladyslav anatoliyovych, to be found guilty of committing administrative offenses provided for in part one and part the second article 172 with the symbol seven of the code of ukraine on administrative offenses with the imposition of an administrative fine by this decision it has been demonstrated that ukraine is still trying to become a european country, the big question is whether there is , uh, objective, impartial justice in ukraine, or whether there is selective justice, everyone must draw their own conclusions and it is obvious in my person that the next local self-government voted for mr. atroschenka over 70% of the citizens of chernihiv, he was one of those heroes who stopped the berig city of berig citizens and stopped the onslaught of the russian army when he was passing through chernihiv. to remove him in order to intimidate all local self-government european politicians are coming to kyiv for the ukraine eu summit , my colleague valeryi

satisfy the appeal, the decision of the yavorivsky district court of the lviv region dated december 7, 2022 on bringing the atrosh woman to administrativeponsibility, the official stated that he considers this decision unfair and directed against of ukraine as a democratic state, this decision demonstrates that ukraine is only trying to become a european country, and there is a big question whether is there an objective unbiased justice in ukraine? is there selective justice? everyone has to draw their own conclusions and it is obvious in my person that the attack on local self-government is over 70% of the citizens of chernihiv who voted for patroshchenko. he was one of those heroes who stopped the city from falling. guarded the citizens and stopped the onslaught of the russian aggressor when he was passing through chernihiv . they even handed him an order, they didn't hand it over, but they issued an order and immediately gave a command to the parties for those . all local self-government is currently planning to appeal to the chernihiv city council european court of human rights, the decision of the first instance of the yavoriv cour

satisfied by the decision of the yavoriv district, the court of the lviv region from on december 7, 2022, about bringing an atrosh citizen to the administrative responsibility of vladyslav anatoliyovych, an atrosh woman, to be considered guilty of committing administrative offenses provided for in part one and part two of article 172 with the symbol seven of the code of ukraine on administrative offenses with the imposition of an administrative penalty, this decision demonstrates that ukraine is only trying to become a european country, there is a big question whether there is an objective and impartial justice in ukraine whether there is selective justice, everyone must draw their own conclusions and it is obvious that in my person the attack on local self-government by mr. atroshchenko was voted by more than 70% of the citizens of chernihiv he was one of those heroes who stopped the citizens of the city and stopped the onslaught of the russian aggressor when he was passing through chernihiv. he was even awarded an order, not awarded , but they issued an order and immediately ordered the courts to remove him in order to once again intimidate

ready bear administrative responsibility, but forgive me, such a violation has nothing to do with any right to remove the mayor, especially by the incomprehensible yavoriv district court of the lvivn , and when we talk today about our course towards the european union, this court is just an example of what some people do not want to see us in the european union, and this is not muscovite , with whom everything is already clear, this is internal officials who are using various means today to ensure that ukraine does not respond standards of the european union, because if ukraine does not ensure the rule of law, if ukraine does not ensure freedom of speech, if ukraine does not ensure the free development and full-fledged management of territorial communities, what we call decentralization, then we simply will not be members of the european union, and this is clear and it seems that muscovites who do not were able to defeat us on the battlefield, they simply adopted a different strategy, they want to demonstrate ukraine as an authoritarian, illegal, uncivilized state , which, of course, then no one will want to see in part of the european union, on the example of atroschenka, we see