designer he has some experience in the fashion industry he's done multiple collaborations with marc jacobs and co-founded his own street ware brand, but he's not a designer it's a completely controversial. he's a celebrity he's bringing a buzz around the announcement some say he's more of a creator. louie vuitton is moving more toward a luxury player he's seen as someone like a star designer at louie vuitton who died in 1991 he was a black man high in his position there's a continuation there. >> it seems like it's a bit of gamble because the last couple of days julianna and i were talking about some of the brands collaborating with musicians and it hasn't worked out their collaboration with beyonce and ivy park hasn't worked out so well either i wonder how that's all going to pay out for them it's a bit of a gamble. >> it is a bit of a gamel. it is a gamel. it's also a new thing, his firs big appointment. maybe wonders could pay off. >> charlotte, thank you very much for the luxury overview today. that's charlotte reed, french correspondent talking today about french luxury stocks. >>> sw

who was an icon in the fashion business these are literally big shoes to fill before that it was marc jacobshis is a big bet because this is a brand that's now $20 billion and he's now in charge not just collaborating on sunglasses and sneakers. so far shareholders like it. >> do you imagine this is now in the portfolio that is pharrell about is this a job that takes 50% of his time, 25% of his time, 100% of his time that and how does that work again, you talk about shareholders, larger company how does the portfolio approach work >> yeah, andrew. was the question i was asking yesterday. you know, to analysts and also to myself because, again, he's had all these fun collaborations he can continue doing red carpet events, dabbling in music production when you're doing two giant collections and all the shows around it that span the entire product range, this is going to be his life and job and a very demanding one. so i think it radically changing his life this is going to be his full-time gig. >> one question. how much money do you think he's getting for this because he makes an enormous amou

president trump called pence around 10 am on january 6th as pence met with marc short and greg jacob. pence excused himself to take the call upstairs, alone. i'm heading to the capitol soon, pence told trump. i told you i'd sleep on it, i would take a look with my team. i'll hear any objections and evidence. but when i go to capitol the, i will do my job. mike, this is not right, trump said, calling from the oval office. mike, you can do this. i'm counting on you to do it. if you don't do it, i picked the wrong man four years ago. you are going to wimp out, trump said. his anger was visible to others in the oval office including his daughter, ivanka. the next time mike pence told his story, it was for money in his book titled, so help me god. here is mike pence's book account of that phone call from donald trump on the morning of january 6th. and this account heavily overlaps with, including some quoted lines, with bob woodward and robert costa's account. the pence book says, when the phone rang a little after 11 am, it was the president. i picked up the phone and the white house oper

we know that two of mike pence's top aides, greg jacob and marc short, they did fight their subpoenasthey ultimately did give testimony to the grand jury back in october. so, this is a big subpoena for the special counsel, but something that we should have expected because we knew these negotiations were definitely ongoing with pence's legal team here, wolf. so, unclear exactly what additional information beyond what was in his memoir the former vice president will be able to give, but still a big move from the special counsel. >> all right, jes isica, substantistand by. i want to bring in kaitlan collins, who broke this for us, got the information. give us a sense of what's going on right now and what you're learning from your various sources. >> wolf, it's not a total surprise. it's something we'd kind of seen potentially in the making, given what we had been hearing from sources at the justice department and in this orbit who are watching and seeing what this special counsel was doing, but it's a notable development, and i am told that pence's team got word of this earlier this wee

. >> you made a point a marc short and greg jacobs his advisers testified before the committee providing infallible testimony. he was reluctant, he said he didn't want to testify before the committee and we see a delay at least happening with the doj. is it your belief that he will ultimately end up speaking to the doj in this investigation? do you think the laws really on the doj side and then we are gonna find out answers to those questions? mike pence and certainly told the public a lot about that day already? >> my guess is that he will end up testifying. first, although it's unprecedented, there's not a lot of there's no case law as to a vice presidents assertion of speech or debate, it's not a complicated decision to make, and i think the judge will make a quick decision because it's not that complicated. and he may appeal, but grand jury appeals go much quicker than i say that the january six committee found in our civil efforts to get our subpoenas in force. i suspect that he will testify. i would guess that he is basically -- i don't know why he's doing this. obviously some of s

same problem you had with sending his former chief of staff, former advisor, marc short, former outside counsel craig jacob's to testified to that january 6th committee, which is that, all of it is under oath. a book is not under oath. it's like the rest of the trump era administration looks so it's some of which are still coming out. he cannot avoid it, and i will tell you this, the subpoena, really, you can shirk a house subpoena and, you can run out the clock, and hope that the chamber flips. >> tommy, you are talking a purely legal teams, which i appreciate, but i think we both know that there is a political calculus going on here. as you have pence looking towards 2024, talk to me about the extent that you think it is weighing on his decision-making. >> well, he is hedging so much on this. in the last few years, we have to talk for the last 11 years, talking with his folks. but, in the last two years in particular about this issue with him. so, what you saw when he was campaigning in the midterms, was he was trying to talk forward, talk past, talk about the future of the party, and he just can't. he is

marc short is the only person for whom executive privilege has been overcome. it has been overcome for greg jacobllone and pat philbin. that is our expectation because we can't see what is going on in the courtroom during these grand jury to gushes. we can only see, basically, who is there and what people are telling our reporter friends for publications anonymously. there is expectation that privilege has been overcome for each of those people. out expect the same to be true of mark meadows. if there is any flicker of recognition of executive privilege, it should apply to him. >> okay, weijia reuben, we shall see with your help. thank you very much. the security conference and whether there's any talk there about an off ramp for the ukraine war, plus consumer advocate erin brockovich on the next steps that need to be taken at the site of the toxic train derailment in ohio. train derailment in ohio. train derailment in ohio. but shingrix protects. proven over 90% effective, shingrix is a vaccine used to prevent shingles in adults 50 years and older. shingrix does not protect everyone and is not f