territory of the museum, although representatives of the monastery declare the revival of the tithe church and believe that this mission of rebuilding belongs to them. the site of the church is available only in russian and in english , the ministry of culture and information policy and the kyiv city state administration , which also consider the building to be arbitrary, appear on the side of the museum in the court case the construction object located on the disputed plot of land is an object of self-construction because it was built without obtaining the initial data for its construction, that is, it was built without the right to perform construction works, the object was not put into operation, the reference of the representative of the defendant to the presidential decree which we heard several times today that the defendant does not have the right to carry out construction work in the museum, they emphasize that the religious building does not fit into the historical context and the excursion program of the unique places, this territory is truly unique, because it was here that a un

of ukraine this religious building is located literally 30 meters from the foundation of the tithing churche temple of kyiv rus' construction which started immediately after the baptism of russia by volodymyr, this large area is under the protection of unesco, and the right to use the land belongs to the national museum of the history of ukraine as early as 2004, the religious community agreed with the former management of the museum to establish real estate on this territory, but the museum emphasizes that the agreements were of a temporary nature the museum then asked for consent for some one-off events, it started with a tent, then a shantytown, then something else probably the metal pigtails burned, but over the years the tent turned into a kiosk, then into a wooden structure, and finally into a building in its current form. so, the building became popularly known as the monkey temple or the kiosk temple. in 2012, the religious community obtained legal ownership of this property through the court. but not on the ground, maybe they had some plans somewhere, some previous agreements, mayb

this religious building is literally 30 meters from the foundation of the tithe church of the first stone kyivan rus, the construction of which began immediately after the baptism of rus by volodymyr , this large area is under the protection of unesco, and the right to use the land belongs to the national museum of the history of ukraine. territory of immovable property, however, the museum emphasizes that the agreements were of a temporary nature from the museum, there were then questions of consent for some one-time events events, it started with a tent, then a shack, then something burned there, probably metal pigtails , but over the years, the tent turned into a kiosk, then into a wooden structure, and finally into a building in its current form. so, the structure became popularly known as the temple of monkeys or the temple of kiosks in 2012 in 2016, the religious community through the court received ownership rights to this property, but not to the land. it is possible that they had some plans somewhere , some previous agreements, maybe someone promised something there at the level

russian orthodox church erected such an improvised tent near the remains of the foundation of the tithe church, which they called a chapel or a temple. well, but in fact it was a monkey that later grew into such a construction wagon, then a wooden chapel, and then a stone church, in fact, in the form we see it now, and when the brothers on khreshchatyk had shawarma, i understand that any such initiatives for the map also needs documentation accordingly, and documentation was also needed in 2007, even the general prosecutor's office opened proceedings that this one was actually illegal , it should be demolished, but as we understand it, the rpc simply agreed with the relevant services and accordingly, it had stood up to now , that is, there was already a petition initiated by the public twice in 2018-2023, it received more than 11 and 6,000 votes that the mafia is illegal , it should be abolished, and there was also a lawsuit initially in 2018, which was initiated by deputies igor lutsenko, the historical museum and the ministry of culture, unfortunately, then considering the fact that the laws

of the museum of the history of ukraine at the place where there is still the foundation of the tithe churchtroyed during the tatar-mongol invasion in the 13th century on the then capital of russia, kyiv is now the capital of ukraine, kyiv is the moscow church made something incomprehensible at first . it was a tent. well, all the residents of kyiv , one way or another, sometimes come there either on business or just to take a walk. a tent, then a small architectural form appeared, and then a more or less monumental structure was built , a stone, and in this structure even some ritualistic actions took place, so to speak , because they do not know whether it can be called worship or not. well, certain ritual services took place uh the moscow church called it a men's monastery i just don't know what exactly it was called this men's monastery what exactly is the name of this men's monastery over there , is it the new alexandrian or saint alexander's monastery in one word they called it a monastery and you you imagine what it is to expand. obviously, they planned if , uh, well, let's say that y

i would say uoc mp near the museum of the history of ukraine on the site of the tithe church. the churchemple, the kiosks, i understand it, the economic court of kyiv satisfied the lawsuit of the national museum of the history of ukraine regarding the building on the territory of the museum, it is about the chapel, which the uoc mp calls the men's monastery of tithes, the number of christmas or the mother of god, the court decided to remove the obstacles use of a plot of land and vacate an arbitrarily occupied plot by demolishing it at the expense of the religious community, i.e. mr. volodymyr. how is that? no , let ’s start with you, mrs. no. you are the representative of the government. what do you think about this decision , when it will be implemented, please, well, i understand that there are still some deadlines for the appeal , but it is not obvious that the legal part is there very well, well, it is also prepared for this the ministry of culture and information policy was involved, i congratulate of course this is a court decision. here is what else you need to understand . this

history of ukraine this religious building is literally 30 meters away from the foundation of the tithing churche first stone temple of kyivan rus , the construction of which began immediately after the baptism of rus by volodymyr, this large territory is under the protection of unesco, and the right to the use of the land belongs to the national museum of the history of ukraine. back in 2004, the religious community agreed with the former management of the museum on the establishment of immovable property on this territory, but the museum emphasizes that the agreements were of a temporary nature from the museum, then there were questions about consent to some one-off events, it started with tents, then a shack, then something burned down there

metropolitan court made a decision regarding the chapel the building of the moscow patriarchate near the tithing church is located in the buffer zone of the unesco monuments on the territory of the national museum of the history of ukraine. the trial on the claim of representatives of the museum and with the support of the kmda and the minkolt has been ongoing since 2020. the plaintiff demanded to remove obstacles to the use of the land plot and to cancel the record of state registration . ownership rights to immovable property, since at first the religious community installed a temporary tent, then it had turned into a full-fledged building without the appropriate permits, this is the decision of the first the instance can be appealed within 20 days from the tent, then the shack, then something burned there, probably metal pigtails , yes and that’s how it is, you know, with a quiet sediment, they use it by chance, but these processes were not brought to the end from this side, because when it all started, it was 2004 year, maybe they had some hopes and there were other procedures for accepting us unde

construction is prohibited and also violates the ensemble of the historical architectural complex tithe churchnow we hope that another military-political expert, columnist oleksandr kovalenko, will join us. yes, we will inform about the most important events. 14th hour 46th hour anna valevska works in the studio and antinburkovsky is also with us. thank you for supporting the completion . you are also with us . i am now. all 463,275 uah. thank you to everyone who joins in. you are a very serious and powerful sum that is simply unreal at first glance, but if everyone can buy everything, i would like to remind you that we are collecting espressovu tv channel together with the outpost ua charity fund for the purchase of powerful portable of battery stations with solar panels for our soldiers, we can see the details of the qr code, you can scan the details of the maps with a smartphone, the first five stations will be transferred to the 406th separate artillery brigade named after general korunzhy oleksiy almazov, in total we need to collect 616 hryvnias, and there are already thousands of hryvnia

between the church and society and the media , is my guest , vakhtang boils. the history of ukraine from an illegally built temple, we are talking about a building. as i understand it , the tithe monastery of the ukrainian orthodox church. tell us what this is. hmm, what is the story with illegal construction and do i understand correctly that, in general, now some other legislative norms are being tightened by the ears in order to have a justification. well, to expel, as it were , the canonical church of the places occupied for a long time, or i misunderstand myself. quite right. you understand it. well, uh, behind these words about making room, there is a very simple truth, so to speak. or a lie, uh, which is that the ukrainian orthodox church. you will have to demolish your temple building, a temple building located in a symbolic place for all orthodox believers together in kiev , this place where, as there is a legend, which is confirmed by historical facts, there used to be the first stone church in russia and this is a very important place. and in fact, many out there would like to. the schismatics succeeded in building the temple, including the schismatics, but now, und

as i understand it , the tithe monastery of the ukrainian orthodox church. tell me what this is.mm what is the story with illegal construction and do i understand correctly that in general, now some other legislative norms are being tightened by the ears in order to have a justification. well, to expel, as it were , the canonical church of the places occupied for a long time, or i misunderstand everything. quite right. you understand it. well, uh behind these words about making room hides a very simple truth or lie, uh, which is that the ukrainian orthodox church. we will have to demolish our temple building, the temple building, located in a symbolic for all orthodox believers together in kiev, is the place where e, as evidenced by the legend, which is confirmed by historical facts , was the first stone church in russia and this is a very important place. and in fact , many out there would like to. the schismatics succeeded in building the temple, including the schismatics, but now under the conditions of the purges carried out by the ukrainian authorities. they decided to demol

churches out on the ground, and they will use the administrative resource. and so, well, the most disturbing thing happened the economic court of the city of kiev decided to dismantle, and the tithery. this temple is over twenty years old. there is a community there, and which stands in a very historical place next to the excavations on the site of the first stone church built by prince vladimir. to the side, yes, that is, he is a prayerful successor. and these are eras. and what is this elephant temple demolition. here, there are pretexts, but just like in soviet times, something was not completed there, and so on. well, in a favorable situation , there was no quickness, of course, but now there is this demolition, as in soviet times prevent traffic from being demolished, but it doesn’t interfere . well, here they will be completely demolished. here under such a pretext. i think that will increase, then see the decision of the citizenship of five bishops of the canonical ukrainian orthodox church, that they are planning a philosophical exchange steamboat. uh, on prisoners of war vsushnikov there or some of the nationalists. uh, nazis, i don't know and hangs when the sword is leg

churches out on the ground, and they will use the administrative resource. and so, well, the most alarming thing happened, the economic court of the city of kiev decided to dismantle, and tithery. this temple is over twenty years old. there is a community there, which stands in a very historical place next to the excavations on the site of the first stone church built by prince vladimir but aside. yes, that is, he is a prayer successor. and these are eras. and what is the word temple demolition. here, there are pretexts, but also , as in soviet times, something is not well- formed there. and so on, well, in a favorable situation, there was no quickness, of course. but now there is this demolition, as in soviet times it interferes with the movement of transport. demolition e does not interfere with two temples i know where they closed, they carried exactly the altar part, the most holy one, they made there, a passage for pedestrians, and the temples were left used for other needs. well, here, uh, they will be completely demolished. here under such a pretext. i think that will increase, then see the decision of the citizenship of five bishops of the canonical ukrainian orthodo

. >> when the detective found evidence in a note, lara that was tithing, giving 10% of his income to the churchighly engaged in his religion and his could middlemen to it? >> as my first thought is, i'm here for some kind of reason, and i believe that, unless this is a complete farce, but there's a hook there. and i'm looking for a hook for that house, i want to hook. >> if there's anybody who could use that hook, it's you. >> and i believe that. that was my initial thought. i can use this. he's feeling something else, and i'm just wondering with that something else is. >> maybe that funded in the backyard shed. isabelle had told detectives, edwin lara had left some things there. what it reveal anything about what happened? forward kayleigh was? mclaughlin opened the door. and this did not look good. >> what did you find in there? >> inside the shed, there was a trash bag. inside that trash bag, there was a green purse. that green purse had a large amount of blood stain on it. >> inside the purse, kayleigh sawyer's passport. there were the shoes she'd put on before the bachelorette party, satur