to risto the cllenges of clime changethey musdo snow. thiis not aroblem for anher day.he invesents we're mang todayill dermine o economifuture. >> according to the u.s. government's 2014 national climate assessment, average temperatures have increased by as much as 1.9 degrees fahrenheit in the u.s. since 1895, with most of the increase occurring since 1970. temperatures are projected to rise another 2 to 4 degrees in most areas of the country in the next few decades. people are already feeling the impact, these early effects of climate change a harbinger of what the future may hold. >> if you're on the coast, most likely it's sea level rise. if you're in the midwest, extreme heat-wave events. extreme flooding and precipitation in the midwest. the heaviest rain events are getting 30% heavier. the folks in the rocky mountain west, they're not gonna recognize the forest even 60 years hence. we're losing most of the pine trees in the southern part of the rocky mountain forests in future projections 'cause it's getting too hot and too dry. >

. >> -- 3 pay risto compensate for the rapidly rising cost of living. the ftsin london closed down slightly. the dax in frankfurt and the cac 24 in paris each notching small gains on the day. wall street has finished mostly flat. falling oil prices hitnergy sector shares. tesla dropped its earnings report just after the closing bell. revenue and earnings per share coming in just about exactly analyst projections. the dow down point 25%, the nasdaq and s&p on either side of the flatline. the goal of new regulation will be to double europe's share of the ship market from 10% to 20% by the end of the decade. some 43 billion euros in both public and private investments will be mobilized with 3.3 billion euros of public funding for research. europe and the u.s. are both seeking to reduce reliance on asia for high-tech manufacturing or last august, washington approved its own $52 billion chips and science act. >> we are in a very competitive situation. we have a competitive advantage. because the european union market is a very cooperative market. we have a l

it is unlikely in many instances to give risto actual liability. >> why wouldn't it be liable? >> the reason we would say is in this case in particular, to the itter arguments tomorrow. our view is neutrality is not part of the 230 c analysis. we say that a person is mu more likely to be liable for aiding and abetting giving ecial treatment to the primary wrongdoing. and so if it is the case that youtube is applying neutral algoth shows more ices videos to people who show more terest in ices. that's much less likely to give rise. >> you seem to be putng lot of stock on the liabity- liability piece of this and i'm ju n se if we go down this road. i'm not sure this is going to pan out. lawsuits will be nonstop. the fama tory material and the's a lot of it that fds its way onto -- there will be a lot of lsus. >> i wouldn't necessary ree that there would be a lot of lawsuits because there are a lot of thiso sue about. even after there's a recommendation, the websites still can't treed as the publisher or speaker of the underlying. >> bigger picture to the chiefs question. n't it be