that's aesop.ifferent ways of gauging and i'm wondering when you're doing all these compare, and that's fine. i assume he stops employee sponsored ownership program. yes, correct. thank you, okay. i just want to make sure i was on the right page there and i wholly encourage and support that. but when you do the comparisons are any of the other waste management organizations that were brought up in the comparison or any of them esops and how did their structure differentiate? and did anyone take that into account? i have john brown's lawyer or directors , process. improvements come up. i started asking the question. good afternoon commissioners. my name is john breslaw. i'm the director of process improvement for ecology. um, former director of finance. so did a lot of work on our aesop and first the answer. where the only that i'm aware of now the only, um, waste company that's 100% employee and certainly the only large waste company. and in terms of the aesop and the impact. um on our business the

than four years after doug died in a kayaking accident scene their dream finally become a reality aesop on a moment. here is. the day that dog died he was on a kayaking trip with our best friends and they got caught out in a severe or westerly wind they were getting pushed farther and farther out into the center of the like and so they decided to abandon the kayak and try to swim to shore. and it was just. too much the dog was in the water for over two and a half hours and they got him out he was helicoptered to the hospital and clay aiken. and somehow the word spread so fast that doug. had either died or was in trouble and as we drove to the hospital people were on. they're hard hats off and opening up. it was amazing i really thought. it was quite extraordinary anyway we got to. way i can and died twenty minutes before so. soon after dogs deaths chile's national congress voted to make him an honorary chilean sea descent it was an official recognition both of the tompkins contribution to the country's natural heritage and of how much the public have come to embrace them. what a live. h

the 1st one, as egypt among other regional allies, such as your aesop did a b l. work at heart body in order to prevent the establishment of a civilian, let alone democratic government in sudan over the last 40 years. on the other hand, you feared that then might turn into a fantasy that might have just to get political and economic that he went to the places that we see right now that an emotional and, and much about the same time. unfortunately, the main goal for it was door stablish, a strong medical role, as is the case in an order or under the believe that this might but event then from sliding into a civil war or finding into accurate execution. unfortunately, it was like a destructive policy or a process that came to unfortunately if you see the behavior where the last 40 years are on what had they supported the medical component within the transition and suffering counsel and the other hand, the supported also the good it was staging by and, but i don't have it at that time. 2021. then the tried to so discord between civilian force, a dividend that was pai