mr. demarko, welcome. >> thank you. so, i will be fairly brief and open up to questions. everything is in the memo as well as in the larger guide book, both of which provided to the respondent and to the public on the website. so, i are want to just mention three quick things that i'll draw your attention to first. just to we are not dealing with substance today but take a step back and remind of the case in general. this was a case where the respondent mr. taylor was alleged to have coordinated between a committee and a pack to facilitate a $10 thousand expenditure by the pack that went towards supporting the committee, his coordination is alleged to have (indiscernible) into contribution far over the $500 limit. flowing from that, the executive director found probable cause for 8 counts. the first 2 were that the respondent caused violations by both the committee to have accepted the contribution over the limit and the pack to have given the contribution over the limit. counts 3-6 are related to respondent causing the committee and pack to have not filed the proper camp

mr. demarko, welcome. >> thank you. so, i will be fairly brief and open up to questions. everything is in the memo as well as in the larger guide book, both of which provided to the respondent and to the public on the website. so, i are want to just mention three quick things that i'll draw your attention to first. just to we are not dealing with substance today but take a step back and remind of the case in general. this was a case where the respondent mr. taylor was alleged to have coordinated between a committee and a pack to facilitate a $10 thousand expenditure by the pack that went towards supporting the committee, his coordination is alleged to have (indiscernible) into contribution far over the $500 limit. flowing from that, the executive director found probable cause for 8 counts. the first 2 were that the respondent caused violations by both the committee to have accepted the contribution over the limit and the pack to have given the contribution over the limit. counts 3-6 are related to respondent causing the committee and pack to have not filed the proper camp

mr. demarko, welcome. >> thank you. so, i will be fairly brief and open up to questions. everything is in the memo as well as in the larger guide book, both of which provided to the respondent and to the public on the website. so, i are want to just mention three quick things that i'll draw your attention to first. just to we are not dealing with substance today but take a step back and remind of the case in general. this was a case where the respondent mr. taylor was alleged to have coordinated between a committee and a pack to facilitate a $10 thousand expenditure by the pack that went towards supporting the committee, his coordination is alleged to have (indiscernible) into contribution far over the $500 limit. flowing from that, the executive director found probable cause for 8 counts. the first 2 were that the respondent caused violations by both the committee to have accepted the contribution over the limit and the pack to have given the contribution over the limit. counts 3-6 are related to respondent causing the committee and pack to have not filed the proper camp

mr. demarko, welcome. >> thank you. so, i will be fairly brief and open up to questions. everything is in the memo as well as in the larger guide book, both of which provided to the respondent and to the public on the website. so, i are want to just mention three quick things that i'll draw your attention to first. just to we are not dealing with substance today but take a step back and remind of the case in general. this was a case where the respondent mr. taylor was alleged to have coordinated between a committee and a pack to facilitate a $10 thousand expenditure by the pack that went towards supporting the committee, his coordination is alleged to have (indiscernible) into contribution far over the $500 limit. flowing from that, the executive director found probable cause for 8 counts. the first 2 were that the respondent caused violations by both the committee to have accepted the contribution over the limit and the pack to have given the contribution over the limit. counts 3-6 are related to respondent causing the committee and pack to have not filed the proper camp