mr. altman: correct. senator graham: this world organization that doesn't exist, maybe it will, if you don't do something about the china part of it you'll never get this right, do you agree? mr. altman: that's why i think -- it doesn't necessarily have to be a world organization, there has to be some sort of -- there are a lot of options. some sort of standard, set of controls. senator graham: other people doing this. military application. how can a.i. change warfare? you got one minute. mr. altman: i got one minute? all right. that's a tough question for one minute. this is very far out of my area of expertise. senator graham: a drone. you can pwhrug into a drone the coordinates and it can fly out and goes over this target and drops a missile on this car moving down the road. could a.i. create a situation where a drone can select the target itself? mr. altman: i think we shouldn't allow that. senator graham: can it be done? mr. altman: sure. chair blumenthal: thank you, senator graham. senator coons. senator coons: th

mr. graham. and can you imagine a senior russian veteran politician calling for the assassination of president boynton openly, what the reaction would be in the west? we can actually have a look at some of these threats that have been made come from the us towards russia . the only way this ends is for somebody in russia to take this guy out. you wouldn't be doing your country a great service in the world, a great service. i don't agree that we can't get him and i think he knows that you can ask cas, i'm still a money in a run. what happens when we decide somebody is a threat to the us? i like the structural path we're on here. as long as the way up ukraine with the weapons, they need an economic support. they will fight to the last person. these perhaps some of the sort of a la carte attitude in the west and media in the us in particular. they don't seem to be diminishing. and i think as this long mood in vaunted ukrainian offensive comes, the attacks on belle grove are going to see more more of

mr. graham, and we are, can you imagine a senior russian veteran politician calling for the assassination of a president boynton openly, what the reaction would be in the west. we can actually have a look at some of these threats that have been made come from the us towards russia . the only way this ends is for somebody in russia to take this guy out. you wouldn't be doing your country a great service in the world, a great service. i don't agree that we can't get him and i think he knows that you can ask cast them soul of money in a run. what happens when we decide somebody is a threat to the us? i like the structural path we're on here. as long as the way up ukraine with the weapons, they need an economic support. they will fight to the last person. so you can see these traps out of the sort of la carte attitude into western media in the us in particular. they don't seem to be diminishing and i think us this long and moved it and wanted ukrainian offensive comes the attacks on belle grove are going to see more more of this acceleration of this type of rhetoric in the, in the weeks and m

she sits on the german government advisory council of economists, mrs. graham. it's good to have you on the program. inflation has persisted and yet energy prices, they have fallen considerably. what is fueling inflation now? yeah, inflation is persisting headline insulation um is still uh has risen again in a pro, but particularly call inflation is very positive assistance. and this is youtube raising wages of the reasons negotiations have a way just significantly and also the energy prices are passed on to the consumers only slowly in some countries in some countries. this happened quite fast as in spain, but not the countries like. and so many of this happens by and by and it's still feeding into inflation. so economy is to say that if corporate profits were either turned into more wages, for example, or if you were to take them out of the equation, that inflation would be back at normative levels. what do you say? as i find the narrative of russet ribbon inflation, not so plausible of profits are high in some industry. but this is due to the fact that the mi

mr. graham. and can you imagine a senior russian veteran politician calling for the assassination of a president boynton opened me, what the reaction would be in the west. we can actually have a look at some of these threats that have been made come from the us towards, which is the only way this ends is for somebody in russia to take this guy out. you would be doing your country a great service in the world, a great service. i don't agree that we can't get him and i think he knows that you can ask cast them soul of money in a run. what happens when we decide somebody is a threat to the us? i like the structural path we're on here. as long as the way up ukraine with the weapons, they need an economic support. they will fight to the last person. so you can see these traps on the sort of a la carte attitude. interestingly in the us in particular, they don't seem to be diminishing and i think as the, as long as a new didn't volunteer ukrainian offensive comes the attacks on valid relevancy more more

mr. graham. and we are, can you imagine a senior russian veteran politician calling for the assassination of a president boynton, openly, what the reaction would be in the west. we can actually have a look at some of these threats that have been made come from the us towards, which is the only way this ends is for somebody in russia to take this guy out. you wouldn't be doing your country a great service in the world, a great service. i don't agree that we can't get him and i think he knows that you can ask cas, i'm still a money in a run. what happens when we decide somebody is a threat to the us? i like the structural path we're on here. as long as the way up ukraine with the weapons, they need an economic support. they will fight to the last person. so you can see these traps on the sort of la carte attitude into western media in the us in particular, they don't seem to be diminishing. and i think as the as long a mood it involved ukrainian offensive comes the attacks on failure. i'm going to

mr. graham, and we have, can you imagine a senior russian veteran politician calling for the assassination of a president boynton, openly, what the reaction would be in the west. we can actually have a look at some of these threats that have been made come from the us towards russia . the only way this ends is for somebody in russia to take this guy out. you wouldn't be doing your country a great service in the world, a great service. i don't agree that we can't get him and i think he knows that you can ask cas, i'm still a money in a run. what happens when we decide somebody is a threat to the us? i like the structural path we're on here. as long as the way up ukraine with the weapons, they need an economic support. they will fight to the last person. so you can see these traps on the sort of la carte attitude into western media in the us in particular. they don't seem to be diminishing and i think as this long and moved it and wanted ukrainian offensive combs the attacks on failure. i'm going to see more more of this acceleration of this type of rhetoric in the, in the weeks and months t

the timing of that encounter can be identified with some precision, because mrs graham had just stepped be identified with precision, you were seen with nikki,, striding ahead whilst nikki tried to keep pace with you. it would have taken three to for minutes for you and nikki allan to walk from the bus stop to there. you, david boyd, were leading nikki allan to a derelict building surrounded by a walled area of rough scrubland. you took her into that rough ground, where you sexually assaulted her, or at least attempted to do so. nikki was heard screaming at around 10pm by mrs 05borne, who was in herflat at around 10pm by mrs 05borne, who was in her flat overlooking at around 10pm by mrs 05borne, who was in herflat overlooking high street east. you struck her across the face, causing her lip to bleed. you did this to shut her up. before or after this, there must have been some sort of a struggle between you, as nikki�*s and rick came off and she lost both of her shoes. —— her and rack him. among different screens her screams about her fate was sealed, you killed her to silence her and pr

graham: thank you, mr. chairman. i, to come expressed a desire for the court to be more transparent and have rules that the public can relate to. we have been talking about that for quite a while. i've never suggested that the congress should take over the court's ability to regulate itself wasn't i do not believe that is wise. and the letter that was received by the committee was not just assigned by justice roberts, it was signed by all of the judges. all of them have the same concern, not just one. so where do we go and what are we trying to do? i think he was what you are trying to do that here is what you are trying to do the democratic forum. remember when senator schumer went to the court and started yelling at everybody in the court -- not everybody, just pretty much our folks -- i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, cavanaugh, you are released to the whirlwind and you will pay the price. you won't know what will hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. awful decisions -- we all have b

mr. graham with thanks for the advance briefing on this and all the work to get this this far. throor floor is yours. >> we do have a extra dhr member today, because oakland unified teachers are on strike, so i got a 5 year old member here, so he may have something to add later. just to be- >> will he be doing the presentation? >> he may need to be our expert witness on questions that come up. we'll see. happy may 4 by the way. alright. so, thanks again for having us. what you see in front of you now is the charter factors that we utilize when bargaining with any bargaining unit. we have gone over these before when we met with you about the poa contract, and they are the same. as you can see here, we look at things like inflation, we look at the wages and other markets et cetera and the ability of the city ability to pay as well. one of the things we looked at with the fire department is the recruitment and retention and as you may recall, we had a very similar slide up for the police department so when the police department we saw decline of staff all most 8 percent. here you

mr. graham, is an exclusively domestic political american pre-election game. didn't say anything new.the entire senate is asking you to do this by 100 people, if the transfer of 100 people was correct, this is the entire senate. whole senate asks you to do so. why don't you do brinkin can't tell him, we don't want to do it, because we want to leave channels of cooperation with russia for another question. we must position us as absolutely evil, as absolutely evil, so it is played. he says, well maybe yes, never say never and so on. i do not rule out that sooner or later, as part of the course of escalation, the united states will come to the point of recognizing us as a strange sponsor of the construction in theory. it's possible, then we'll kick it out the american embassy, ​​again , in principle, this will not affect anything, including our people, then hersh was left with his doubtful. denya is extremely doubtful , especially from the outside, supposedly that the poles are in charge of all this. the fact is that poland wins practically in almost any outcome of the ukrainian crisis,

mr. graham with thanks for the advance briefing on this and all the work to get this this far. throor floor is yours. >> we do have a extra dhr member today, because oakland unified teachers are on strike, so i got a 5 year old member here, so he may have something to add later. just to be- >> will he be doing the presentation? >> he may need to be our expert witness on questions that come up. we'll see. happy may 4 by the way. alright. so, thanks again for having us. what you see in front of you now is the charter factors that we utilize when bargaining with any bargaining unit. we have gone over these before when we met with you about the poa contract, and they are the same. as you can see here, we look at things like inflation, we look at the wages and other markets et cetera and the ability of the city ability to pay as well. one of the things we looked at with the fire department is the recruitment and retention and as you may recall, we had a very similar slide up for the police department so when the police department we saw decline of staff all most 8 percent. here you

graham: thank you, mr. chairman. i, too, expressed a desire for the court to be more transparent and have rules that the public can relate to. we have been talking about that for quite a while. i've never suggested that the congress should take over the court's ability to regulate itself. i do not believe that is wise. and the letter that was received by the committee was not just signed by justice roberts, it was signed by all of the judges. all of them have the same concern, not just one. so where do we go and what are we trying to do? i think he was what you are trying to do that here is what you are trying to do the democratic forum. remember when senator schumer went to the court and started yelling at everybody in the court -- not everybody, just pretty much our folks -- i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. you won't know what will hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. awful decisions -- we all have been in the bo

mr speaker, everyone hee hee— graham. mr speaker, everyone hee hee hhs— graham. hose who imagine that the opposition has a magic wand up their sleeve to solve these problems need look no further than the woes of the betsy cadwallader board in north wales under labour political control for a generation . well, mr for a generation. well, mr speaker— for a generation. well, mr sheetet .— for a generation. well, mr sheetev. ee— for a generation. well, mr speaker , as my- 1 t1t1“ well, mr speaker , as my honourable friend speaker, as my honourable friend seve— speaker, as my honourable friend says, gloucestershire in hehteutet— says, gloucestershire in particular has- says, gloucestershire in particular has seen a significant- particular has seen a significant reduction in a&e vetthg— significant reduction in a&e waiting times— significant reduction in a&e waiting times since december . we waiting times since december. we teeeehtge— waiting times since december. we teeeehtge et— waiting times since december. we recognise of course,— waiting times since december. we rec

senator graham. >> thank you, mr. chairman.are all the witnesses aware of the fact that when justice roberts declined invitation of chairman durbin that his letter was signed by the entire court? are all of you aware of that? mr. fogel, do you think that was a wise decision? [inaudible] >> thank you, senator. i think, i sit in my statement that i respected, i think it was sincere. i think the problem, and i think it's significant and i will grant that that was signed by all night ofas the justices. that is -- >> that's my point. i just want people to understand that the court as a whole has a problem with this, whether they're right or wrong. i don't -- >> i'm sorry senator. i just what is your one of the thing if it's all right. >> sure. >> i think it's significant that all signed it. it doesn't suggest that that's all that all of them would do. this come it's a point of which all reached consensus. >> you and mr. payne mention something that struck a nerve with me. i'm not into micromanaging the court, but when you look at wh

and then actually, you know, why did you share after alexander graham bell or whoever it was right after mr. watch and i need you to call was what are you wearing? there's always somebody roy, it use it, alfred nobel, dynamite. i try to tell you where, you know there's, there's always somebody out there who can take anything arrow, and opiates wonderful. n o g 6. okay. i go on and so that's always a part of this. here's the thing that bothers me, the most. scotty, have you ever heard of? they say there is a meeting all over the country of leading scientist to decide whether we should or they should continue with the production of this thing. as ask people, should we continue with this or stop? no, what happens is it's introduced. and then you and your family to be with you today . okay, now what do you think he's ever ask us ahead of time? nobody what you're going to see 25 years from now. just in terms of how humans are changing drastically and how they are going to be removed and replaced. and when i say replace, i'm not talking about employment. i mean there are some people who are going

mr. chairman. >> senator graham. >> rather than beating this horse, i would recommend we have a meetingm?f that's okay with you. i've been a judge advocate most of my adult life and we'veet written this in a way to make sure it applies to foreign nationals involved in war crimes in ukraine to help hold putin accountable. we have a lot of valuable information that could accelerate. are you familiar with the group mr. secretary? do you think they are a terrorist organization? >> i think they are a horrible terrorist organization. >> i would like to meet with you and your team to make sure you understand the benefit of this legislation to help this effort. so, general, what are all those stripes on your arm, those white stripes? >> each one represents six amonths in combat. >> since 9/11 how many years have you been away from your family? >> seven, eight, nine, about half the time.ar >> more typical than not. >> it's very typical. my peers and of those senior ncos at this point that have been in this thing have probably spent a year on, a year off half the time basically deployed in iraq and

i'm sure after alexander graham bell or whoever was right after mr. watts and i need you to call was, what are you wearing? there's always somebody who can take something and destroy it. use it, alfred nobel, dynamite try and i to tell you, you know, there's, there's always somebody out there who can take anything, arrow, and opiates wonderful n. oh jesus. okay, i go on. and so that's always a part of this. here's the thing that bothers me, the most of scotty, have you ever heard anybody ever do the following? where they say there was a meeting all over the country of leading scientist to decide whether we should or they should continue with the production of this thing. so as ask people, should we continue with this or stop? no, what happens is it's introduced and then you and your family to be what is it. okay, now, what do you think? well, it's too late. nobody's ever ask us ahead of time. nobody what you're going to see 25 years from now. just in terms of how humans are changing drastically and how they are going to be removed and replaced. and when i say replace, i'm not talking

graham: yes, mr. chairman. thank you very much and senator hawley as well. last weekend this committee, full committee, senate judiciary committee, we dealt with an issue that had been waiting for attention for almost two decades and that is what to do with the social media when it comes to the abuse of children. we had four bills initially that were considered by this committee and what may be history in the making, we passed all four bills with unanimous roll calls. sen. durbin: unanimous roll calls. i can't remember another time when we've done that. on an issue that important. it's an indication, i think, of the important position of this committee and the national debate on issues that affect every single family and affect our future in a profound way. 1989 was a historic watershed year in america because that's when seinfeld arrived. and we had a sitcom which was supposedly about little or nothing, which turned out to be enduring. i like to watch it, obviously, and i always marvel whether she show the -- when show the phones they used in 1989 and compa

no i mean, i don't want to speak for mr key, graham. but i know the obeah does represent more than just contractors. they do include a lot of architects as well, um, so you know, there's a lot of sort of overlap of different interest groups. but by all means again. we want to hear what the pinch points are in the in the process for everyone, whether it's single family homeowners who are developing where there may be only using a contractor, whether you're using a really sophisticated architect, or whether you're doing a tower like we want to hear where all of the different pinch points are happening in the process so we can really use this as an opportunity to fix what is the systemically broken so absolutely we are open for more conversations, and i think from our perspective specific examples specific pinch points so we can help problem solve a resolution. we don't want to overlook any, um, you know, interest group community. anyone who's doing work with the city. we want to understand what their pain points are. okay well, i can't sp

mr. however, said, here, or do you think us senator graham is alone in his nazi rhetoric, but he's the free to exception that the american system comp reduced such a monster. wrong. let me remind you that in a conversation with the pranksters, both on alexis, george bush, the youngest of a dynasty of american precedence said exactly that. assuming that he was talking to the key of regime, your job is to kill as many russians as you can. often we stay to this of the briefing. us propaganda starts as a back truck stressing the bushes. nothing power, both bush and gray, i'm hold political power, then not even saying everything that is spelled out in american doctor know documents. yeah. so maria is a hire of as usual, and very confident, very capable lady, you know, pulling no punches in, in her addressing of this issue. and, of course has been widespread reaction. i've been watching at the social media pages just before we went on air dawn. and there's been some significant reaction as well on, on twitter, for example, if you can have a look at that. and that also that's how pathological rest

mr. durham's report has come out, lindsey graham says they should give it back. will they?ell, "the washington post" had this statement for "the daily mail." they say simply, the post stands by its reporting. in other words, they are not going to give it back. also, there's a tantalizing story in the "new york post" this morning that tawxz a little bit about in 2015 two research assistants went up to capitol hill and spoke to the staffs of adam schiff and jack reed great senator from the rhode island. college researchers were there to brief staffers on university research context and contracts and things like that. it's that easy. instead they go up to talk to these staffers about that and they slide this news story about trump and alpha bank under their noses and said hey, what do you think about this? is there anything to it and at one point, one of the researchers felt very threatened by it because essentially the schiff people said we are going to be in charge soon. so they felt like obviously these were people who probably had a government contract to do research throu

mr. courtney: when these two gentlemen were sworn into office. by former representative graham, you were basically left with a program that was almost in a shambles in terms of trying to restore the promise that was initially made in 2007. i know that from constituents who were running into that stone wall. i think we look at, again, the pace of discharge that's picked up since you guys, along with secretary cardona, have tried to fix the pwhrupl plumbing of this program. obviously we are in the hundreds of thousands of people. i would like to focus particularly on one group, again people, the military service members. the prior administration basically treated service members who were serving overseas eligible for deferment in terms of their monthly payments as nonqualifying months for discharge under the public service loan forgiveness program. to both of you, thank you for recognizing what i think every american believes is that those should be qualifying months for discharge. if you could talk for a second about the system you put into place to help those families. >> can i

lindsey graham pleading for it not to happen. then the punch line of mr. woods' joke. donald trump faces so many other potentially larger problems and tries to regain the white house running for president. we bring in nyu law professor melissa murray to talk about the cases if not the pot brownies. welcome. >> hi, ari. how you doing in. >> i'm doing great. mr. wood is super sharp as so many comedians are. if you watch that he had gags and funny stuff, but a lot of jokes had that very clear informed undercurrent. also happens to come from a family with civil rights and journalistic cred, soy have the impression he's been in these dinner table conversations his whole life. how about the joke he makes, the punch line that a month later it wasn't even a big deal that trump got arrested. how does that work in law and life? is that good or bad? and to finish the allegory, should america be waiting for the more potentially severe sativa strain of a georgia browny? >> i think we are perhaps in the media responsible for the expected high that many people wanted when they took t

mr. chairman. >> thank you, senator holly. going to turn to the chairman of judiciary committee the ranking member senator graham if they have openingemarks as well be. >> yes mr. gentlemen, thank you very much. sutter holly as well. last week in this community full committee the senate judiciary committee we dealt withth an ise that it been waiting for attention from us two decades. that is what to do with the social media when it comes to children. we had four bills initially that were considered by this committee. what may be history in the making, we passed all four bills with unanimous protocols. unanimous roll calls. i cannot remember another time that we have done that on an issue that important. it is an indication i think of the important position of this kitty committee at a national debate that affects every single family affect our future. 1989 was a historic watershed year in america because that is when seinfeld arrived. we have a sitcom which was supposedly about little or nothing which turned out to be enduring. i like to watch it obviously. i always marvel at when they show the phones he used in 1989. i thinkey abou

mrs. feinstein has not cast a vote in the senate since february 16th and since then democrats have been able to move some nominations through with help from republican senator lindsey graham. however, other nominations have been blocked by republicans. >>> in a city that always has a certain energy, the excitement ramping up to a new level in london tonight as we're hours away from the coronation of king charles. it's been seven decades since the last coronation. queen elizabeth, crowned in 1952. right now, hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into the city and camping out, anxious for a chance to get a glimpse of history unfolding there. nbc's jay gray has more from london. >> reporter: the banners are in place with only a few hours left now for rehearsals and final preparations ahead of tomorrow's coronation. >> been around almost 1,000 years. britain's ceremony or the united kingdom's ceremony is the -- one of the only coronations left of its kind. >> god save the king! >> reporter: he has officially been king since his mother's passing, meeting with faith leaders and heads of state, traveling overseas, taking on controversial issues at home. >> he's become a mo

mr. secretary thank you for joining us. >> thank you. trey: joining us now ranking member of senate judiciary committee, great state of south carolina senator lindsey grahamank you, so much for joining us. title 42 to expire the border is already a chaotic disaster, what will happen then? >> the number of illegal crossings of double, it is about 6300 a day, in last 90 days have been over 550 thouthousand illegal crossings, they are expecting that to jump up. policy of repealing title 42 and not replacing it, is literally insane. trey: i know you are in the minority, expectations should not be high of what a political party can do. minority party can do. is there anything you can do about the border. >> on the margins, you will never fix the border challenge you change your asylum laws, why are so many people coming here? they claim asylum, they have a right to be heard. it takes about 5 years to have your case heard. they are released into us the united states waits for their hearing, they never show up, trump said you could not apply for asylum in united states, you had to apply outside of the united states, and we have lowest illegal crossings in decemb

mr. shot, us norfolk southern -- the ph changes to the prepared for graham to prevent derailment accidents? >> senator i apologize i'm not familiar with that program. i'm happy to review the legislation of the program and discuss it with you further. i have a sincere appreciation for the first responders from ohio and pennsylvania. some of whom are joining me on this panel in west virginia who were on the scene. as a result, we just announced yesterday a regional first responder training center that will support the first responders of ohio, pennsylvania, and west virginia. every year we train approximately -- >> is that in the states in which you operate? >> yes, sir. >> all right. >> this is a question for all of you i will start with you my colleagues including ranking member -- einstein. pretty spark. i most people remember einstein is the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over nova again and expect a different result. that might be pretty prudent here today. i was believe in in adversity lies opportunity. that's how i approach. life -- i believe that's how a lot of people

sen graham: i'm not into micromanaging the court but when you look at what other branches do versus the court, mr. payne you say is pretty obvious, is a lower threshold. what i would urge the court to do is take this moment to instill more public confidence. i think we would all be better off if we did it. here's what i want to explain to people. in 1998, justice ginsburg donated a signed copy of her decision in a case where they had to admit women into a school and it was auctioned off at a fundraiser supporting the national organization of women's relief fund. do you agree that if judge alito signed the dobbs decision and gave it to the susan b. anthony pro-life organization to raise money all hell would break loose? >> would i agree that if there was a sale--- >> if alito gave a copy of the dobbs decision all hell would break loose? >> that's why congress needs the play a role. >> why didn't it break loose in 1998? i think we all know the answer to that. justice ginsburg, one of the greatest person to sit on the court received an award from the democratic women's club. can you imagine if justi

graham. she was great as rudy giuliani. >> vote for jeff sessions because i will bend over backwards for you, alabama, and bend over forwards for mrank all the older women in america who have sent me supportive, inspiring, and sometimes graphic emails. >> it all started off by almost the joke. i was being interviewed bay reporter, and they said something like -- >> which actor would you want the play here? here are suggestions i've heard. ben stiller, brad pitt. which one? >> oh, brad pitt, of course. >> these were very difficult, dark moments in our history. "saturday night live" found a way to make us laugh at it. and that was very helpful. >> and in collusion, happy thanksgiving, everybody. >> jeff session, everyone. local life and cultural treasures. because when you experience europe on a viking longship, you'll spend less time getting there and more time being there. viking. exploring the world in comfort. ten years ago, i invented the ring video doorbell for moments like that. and ring security cameras for moments like this. [ring floodlight cam siren sounds] [bear growls] and ring alarm with professional monitoring. ten ye

graham, i have spent 11 out of the last 30 days in east palestine. >> do you think you benefited from having been there and listened to the people? >> very much so. >> what about you, mr. shaw