putin. use the tools we had at the time given the state of ukraine at the time. he then lied to putin in the fourteenth year , when he called and asked vladimir vladimirovich to talk to yanukovych and agree to withdraw the troops to sign, as he stood, yes, unrecognizable, well, repeated his face did not grow old, that he indirectly admitted that it was the choice of the people of crimea, they denied this. they admitted that today's ukraine is their constructor , the ex-president and a person who is still a figure in the democratic party , admits that after all, crimea was the choice of the people on the other side of the other. so to speak, a republican, for example, who is now running for chromosomes. e, an indian by origin, which is now called already. here's what i told russia paper tiger. here he immediately spoke to russia as a paper tiger, so now you see, they have riots going on. and here's the topic. they will now disperse, strengthening their own, supporting their allies. especially given the fact that europe is quite clearly observed, a certain fatigue and from this package of sanctions there are only fields of poles, they say we are already preparing the twelfth package. here is the eleventh received the twelfth package. and it gives you the opportunity to feed. at least this 56 countries of the western camp understood? it can be a priceless question like this at all. well, the uprising was turned america into a paper tiger, that is , listen, we were not, then the rebellion was the past of this. in general, i consider myself a tool , a tool, a tool that was immediately laid down for me in the boxes of cities. it burned, how many municipal police administration centers were seized? france how many millions of people yellow jelly it came out turned france germany mass protests against restrictions on the coronavirus. you never know, if these idiots knew russian history, they would pay attention to what, let's say, the reign of catherine this russia was great on paper. there was nothing during the time of catherine the great that needed to be remembered, yes, it was to be restored. well, as catherine and russia of this time, the paper tiger raised an eyebrow, europe was shaking at 10:00 the question is, what is this topic and what i’m talking about, it’s not that she really is the opposite. about russia naive and wrong, you just need to understand once and for all, they never understood anything about russia and never did. pyotr alekseevich was a weak tsar, and volodya shot and rebellion streletsky not only a lot of what us. it's not on us. it is calculated. it is calculated for the elevators own lags, and not in their perception, as they perceive us. they are our enemy, the more they make mistakes, the better for us, the worse. they understand us in the dark. i agree with this assessment of our weaknesses and other work, only we agree with this for a strong side, which they conducted showed that they do not understand anything about the russian economy as a result of these sanctions on their economy. shaken germany fell into recession ours is growing. therefore, excellent experts in russia and excellent advisers from western leaders. yes, they are not so consolidated, they need to consolidate much less now, they need to take enacle. baum this whole set is degenerate. squeeze out the order of friendship by misleading your leadership on the true strength and plans of russia such a set of degenerates on a salary. we had to look, let's start with the fact that russia is not a tiger and a bear, as you know, and that we make paper, therefore, as we want, we will use the forest, fuck the wood our. yes, of course, among the citizens of belarus there is now pride in our president, the role he played, but, knowing the character of alexander grigoryevich, i think that he would prefer that this whole situation did not exist at all. and to cooperate more closely with russia in other areas, of course. here, uh, it was also important that the president of belarus was familiar with prigogine, it was important and , probably, fundamentally, the measures that the president of russia took because the side of the rebels was on the other side. they saw small chances for victory, to put it mildly, those who are now declares that it could have been released differently. here you just think and situation. imagine, we are discussing this now, when the situation is almost resolved, and we would discuss whether you are afraid yes in rostov on the oka on the moscow ring road. these are completely different situations, so it was resolved the way it was resolved. here, the two presidents of russia and belarus have shown wisdom. most importantly, russia has shown its strength, but it is necessary to draw certain conclusions, because the situation was caused by both subjective and objective reasons. conflict, with the ministry of defense was the cause. no, i think this person has been moving towards this goal for a long time. it's a media campaign that we've been watching for months, and it's focused on that. that is, it matured. a legal and political gap arose without laws without legal formalization without a political assessment , not just a private army was formed, but a parallel state that had both power structures. informational financial political support for an emerging actively promoted ideology is parallel state here too. so, uh, they said, were there examples like this when they rebelled during the war? i'll tell you there was such a very striking example, very similar, by the way, very similar. mazepa was the closest associate of peter i and right in the middle of the war with the swedes. he spoke out against it, and there were cossack heroes, who, after all , signaled on the side of russia. remember the fate of kochubey and so on. this is extremely interesting. well, not quite , he still consults with charles the twelfth became his ally. and here i am i'm talking about a shock about the level of shock for russia, uh, both then and now, and, of course, in this regard, measures should be m-m aimed at the unity of the armed forces. a civil war was started here, but why did the reds defeat the whites? because yes, there was makhno, there was grigoriev , there was a lot of partisanism there, but the red army was in 1818. this is one army, and in the twenty-first year in the twenty- second, five and a half million are clearly consolidated subordinate to a single command. and the whites, as dutov was there , the tsyaninkovites, the semyonovites. there kolchak gives the order this is maxi. he says, i won’t go, i don’t want to sit with this transbaikal and i will sit. here are two paradigms and the paradigm of victory, you repeatedly use this term, but the red army needs to become the red army the next moment, and these are political figures who will appear and receive their political capital in a special military operation. and they will be in the future, we say a new generation will come. officers will come from the front. they will come and they will claim their place in political system, where will this place? what kind of ideology it will be, we need to think about it already now, because we see that the participation of society, there are certain criticisms. and the direction cannot be ignored when people talk about the oligarchs, their continued influence, when people criticize the bureaucracy. here are all those critical sentiments. they cannot be simply stopped or they cannot be removed somewhere. they should be sent to the legal political field, and here. i have big questions about political parties. yes they consolidated act as a united front, but their role, just the same, to carry out this function, those different moods should be expressed by political parties, not only united russia but also by the rest, represented both by the state duma and, in principle, on the political field of the russian federation and started by people will find their way out. to start. there are telegram channels, then informal organizations, but, unfortunately, this is the law of political life , we need to think about this now. the next moment, but there is a certain request for changes and we talked about this, that either there will be revolutionary, even if i’m not talking about a full-fledged revolution, revolutionary from above in ideology in decisions to change some political economic mechanisms, or these demands will continue to grow from within. after all, prigogine felt some moods that are present, in general, he was mistaken, but he felt and counted on success. otherwise, they would not have performed, so these conclusions must be drawn, but at the same time, all such a very important result. russia has shown its political strength or is it not split the people failed to shake the army resisted putinf our union state. they, uh, didn’t just remain untouchable, they showed their effectiveness and the enemy fished early for all these statements. which went from the deputy minister of defense of ukraine anna malyar. now we’ll start from the fact that our fugitive belarusians there, vilnius, warsaw, kiev , began to declare that we ’ll go to belarus now, some headquarters screwed up, screwed everything up, because they underestimated just the same sustainability. with all this, with all the criticism that we express in spite of all these shortcomings, and we will talk about it. and the important thing is that we are talking about it, because they think that we drive all the problems there. no, we should discuss them. we must pay attention. but i would like them to be resolved at the same time, now this is an important milestone event. along with ukraine's attempted counteroffensive, this rebellion is a turning point, a turning point where further the russian government should show and s