and as if ahead of the defense of the biologist alexander tsvetkov, the arguments are the same as in august 2002 in moscow and moscow region, he was not exactly where they were committed. the four murders that we are now incriminating at that time, he was allegedly on a business trip , went to the yaroslavl kostroma and ivanovo regions , participated in the expedition, explored, and the underwater world and, accordingly, physically could not be in the capital region , this is evidenced by the relevant orders from the scientific institutions in which tsvetkov worked, again, and the investigation really has these orders, but there are no specific notes that he went on this expedition and now all the evidence that he participated in the expedition. and at that time he was on a business trip , only his testimony indicates this. and the immediate environment, of course, is now for the entire scientific world, and the accusations against tsvetkov came as a shock, but it is precisely the absence of a full-fledged evidence base in favor of protecting the biologist that does not give the inve