it's easy for me, as dmitry shipilov threw out a dog, he bought a used car in a car dealership. le and purchase agreement drawn up by the owner. after 3 1/2 years. the investigator called dmitry. there is an opportunity to come to testify and by car, specifically by car, i came to testify. everything was fine and i was about to leave. he speaks, but now on the basis of the notch. we seize this car from you. it turned out that the previous owner of the car, aiman usmanova, asked her nephew to sell the car. he gave it up in a car dealership, but the money is not returned car dealership claims that she was on this deal. yes, she says that i was not there, and i won three legal ones. three instances went there, all three instances confirmed the right of ownership and about the owner, but i can’t get my car, according to the investigators, the car is material evidence in a criminal case, and the investigator recognizes fraud as material evidence that is not such. since the object of theft is money, proceeds from the sale of this car to the relatives of the victim, which he simply di