the dream with mark rosenberg is the founder of the center for a i a digital policy. i asked him what he made of the you in conference a i for good as well. first of all, i think it was great to add drugs to have the robots at the press conference. i hope they had a good time. hi, managing the audience in the press, supposed to do so. but as for the conference title, we make a very good client. i think, from the organizers are describing is an ambition that, hey, i will be used for good. and we see this in a lot of the events that are organized around the emergence of artificial intelligence. because there are legitimate concerns that a i can also cause real harmony. if it can replicate bias, can reinforce hierarchy. it can displace workers and it could lead us accidentally into a military conflict. mm hm. so while looking at some of the upsides which include innovations and health and medicine and new forms of transportation, efficiency and battle and climate change, all wonderful goals, i think we also need to think critically and how about some of the risks. there

mark white, thank indeed. well thank you very much indeed. well i'm joined by joshua rosenbergsolicitor and former bbc legal correspondent, privacy . legal correspondent, privacy. privacy. it's a word that we've been debating a lot , not just been debating a lot, not just this week, but actually pre and post leveson, which changed the law in this country. we have article eight of course you know, of the human rights legislation , the right to legislation, the right to privacy. and a lot of that depends on how judges interpret it to what extent is this list of charges that the sun newspaper have brought? to what extent do you believe these are matters of public interest? that's what the sun had to balance when it decided not to name hugh edwards , because you name hugh edwards, because you referred to article eight, right. >> to respect for a person's private and family life. article ten of the human rights convention protects freedom of expression. what the courts have always had to do is balance those two rights, not an easy thing. it all depends on the circumstance. >> cases