u. e. u. does your opinion on, i believe having better ties with this name is known as a human neighbors find. and then having better ties won't, stinks, and ties with the brakes. countries will be a better suited route, especially of the what's happening is these days with the, the, the, the organization of, um, on the go on the what the global macro, my creation with the situation presented us copy of the more from hereditary prints of the year after this break, the the, i don't see this conflict, so as the one over a values best not to say that there might not be differences in values between uh, you know, elements of the us population or elements of the us leadership and elements of the russian population in russian leadership, there may well be some differences, but i don't see it as conflict as having to do with that. i see this primarily as really, frankly, a proxy or on rushes border that is being pursued by the u. s. and the new powers, the the welcome back to going underground. i'm still here with the registry prince of serbia principal, the principal. but i going to ask, i, we, we bought one about the dollar eyes ation, obviously. but i'll give you investment advice out here. but you know that many people in power think that big going is a scam, does it come down to power? i'm the is it's have similarities and echoes in the dollar eyes ation that is accompanying the war in ukraine. there is a change of power in the world and it's taking the form of how we pay for things as well. that's. so it's a, it's a good points and starts saying it's understandable that the queen is going to be like, well, does this come on? this and the negative tell me that i guess like it's associated with something that's a, that's different the something that brings a better future. and those empower now are obviously going to do everything they can to try and stop this because it will say power away from the hands

not only e u, v, but the less advanced d, you, me, d, u, v. machines from the netherlands to china actually began in the previous administration . and that's important context because it really does show an absolution of us policy to regard china increasingly as a threat unless as a customer that is largely in effect of the pursuit of civil military fusion and china, which increasingly blurs the line between one is primarily a civilian good, and one that is primarily a military good. i understand that the united states provided sufficient intelligence to the doctor government to convince them that it really was a matter of national security to control the u. v. machines. and furthermore, countries like japan, the mother lands and even south korea, had really had it with ip asked when it comes to high attack. and so i think it was the perfect confluence of factors leading to these additional controls. okay, well, we'll get into what these machines actually are and what they do and just above it but, but 1st step and what do you make all of this? that must be some legitimate security concerns. so when you call and have a potential advisory in possession of technology to pay ultimat

does not support the use of the weapons. in general, the u. k. is signature e to a convention which prohibits the production or use of cluster munitions and discourages that use. the u. k. has itself been criticized for sending all the weapons, the can cause loss of environmental damage and serious illness. the people long off to the was it then did it much she confirmed with provide all the piercing rounds the contain depleted uranium thus used by the us in a rock in the 1st cold full 32 years ago. they've left the legacy of kansas and illnesses among people that have been all the countries phones point a to the international. you can watch to a b, i a, a says a could be a risk. the people who handle fragments of depleted uranium on the 2019 study and the general environmental pollution link. they use a shelf in the water rocks to a sharp rise invest effects and come to the us says it must send cost to bones. now because ukraine is running out of conventional weapons, but even some health representative and biden's democratic policy have criticized the decision, saying the weapons will kill civilians and leave the us unable to multiply the high moral ground to the