a ban can be set in your credit history, by sending an appeal to the credit bureau to a bank or an mfiough public services , you can lift the ban in the same way, but in this case you will need an enhanced qualified electronic signature, which not everyone has. how it works. you can install a self-ban for free an unlimited number of times , the ban itself will be displayed in the credit history and will take effect 7 days after the application is submitted. if you want to take a loan, then you can do this no earlier than 2 days after you send a request to the abolition of self-prohibition. well, as the central bank explained, this is necessary so that the borrower has a chance to think about his actions in case he decides to lift the self-prohibition under the influence, for example, of scammers who want to issue loans to him, before squeezing out a bank or mfi loan to someone, checks the credit history of a potential borrower in all databases, if they see a self-prohibition mark, they will refuse a loan, even if all documents are in order, the ban itself can be set for any installment

such a ban can be set in your credit history by sending applications to credit bureaus in a bank or mfiblic services. you can remove the ban in the same way, but in this case you will need an enhanced qualified electronic signature, which not everyone has . for free, an unlimited number of times , the ban itself will be displayed in the credit history and will be valid 7 days after the application is submitted. if you want to take out a loan, then you can do it no earlier than through 2 days after you submit your self-ban cancellation request. well, as the central bank explained, this is necessary so that the borrower has a chance to think about his actions in case he decides to lift the self-prohibition under the influence, for example, of scammers who want to issue loans to him, before squeezing out a bank or mfi loan to someone, checks the credit history of a potential borrower in all databases, if they see a self-prohibition mark, they will say in a loan, even if all the documents are in order, the ban itself can be set on any installment loans or only some, if , for example, a bank

is better just pay off such payments in one single amount and immediately keep in mind that if the mfi required by law, then you are easily in court. you can master it, but let's be clear. you can reduce the amount of interest, penalties and fines, however , in any case, you will have to return the mfi, the tumatulka that you could not take, that is, the loan body that you were given to completely write off your microloan. you will not succeed. so what are the ways to deal with your debt hole, well , the first is the most banal and simple - this is pay the microloan in full, as i said earlier, it's better. but also the amounts try to accumulate this money. try to take a debt from your relatives or friends, but pay it off right away, otherwise singing fines and interest will accrue to you all the time, so you can start negotiations from the floor. well, firstly, they usually call themselves to remind you of your debts, interest and so on. but if suddenly they don’t call you, then it’s better for you to give in to correspondence with them. be required to be in writing by registered mail

yes, the problems are also in another thing, that there is a market for microfinance institutions mfisce of bailiffs is not clear, that is, from microfinance organizations may call to threaten and these people are not considered collectors the lion's share. well, a significant proportion of such complaints come, unfortunately, from microfinance organizations. they must live by the same absolutely rules as other collectors, and animals. and well, partly. well, how once again, the bill that we just mentioned to you, uh, which is aimed at bringing the activities of microfinance organizations under control and enabling bailiffs to fully control this market. so he just should offend this sphere of activity to an even greater extent. what rooks still need to be closed? here, where these narrow streams flow away , there should not be any such anonymous callers. there should not be anonymous subscribers. yes it shouldn't be direct threats, because these are direct threats. this is a criminal liability. now, if we minimize, first of all, at the level of practice, all these manifestations, then