but if in bulgakov’s case the causes of all troubles, and mikhail afanasyevich considered his literarynemies of envious critics, then if we read alexander green, we will see what he gives the answer to this question is very simple . so i was right or wrong in this harsh trial of himself, what do we know about this writer in general, and in 1880 in vyatka in the family of a polish revolutionary who was exiled in siberia and then married a russian woman and moved from siberia to a branch , a boy was born who was named alexander brought him up from the hands. won bad green quite a lot. he devotes space and attention to his story to how he was brought up. and this, if you like, is such a novel anti-education, there was no consistency , he was either beaten or praised for anything, he was not accustomed to either work or study. in general, growth is such a useless person, absolutely incapable of anything. but uh, he also had such a feature, he loved to compose poems from childhood and once he composed poems addressed to his teacher at the gymnasium where he studied there were such satirical

the chief architect was alexei shchusev mikhail wrote about the opening bulgakov, the first grandiose construction site of the ussr , the organizers wrote that we were bringing peasants to moscow, who, perhaps, had never seen a steam locomotive. all-union agricultural exhibition it is called the predecessor of vdnkh tactics and strategy everything is under the control of the supreme commander in chief vladimir putin visited the headquarters of the group of troops participating in a special military operation in rostov-on-don reports from senior officers the meeting was held behind closed doors i will add the president promptly receives all the data the state of affairs in the zone of words, including from local commanders a daily flow of information, but at the same time the head of state repeatedly personally visits the headquarters all known details at pavel krasnov at the door of the command post in rostov-on-don , the president was met by the chief of the general staff valery gerasimov since january of this year, he has been leading the joint grouping of troops in the special oper

mikhail bulgakov was most of all a young author, impressed by the pavilions with confectionery productsmbraces the sweet smell of caramel, white caps, snow robes, crushes the caramel mass of the machine cuts caramel cones on the plates bowls with stuffing, and this is already a famous film about the new agricultural exhibition of the thirty -ninth year pig and shepherd love in the main characters classes and musaiba. pony animal husbandry was born. please tell me the name of the pig. this is not a pig hog shooting, as well as the exhibition itself took place on the territory, this time vdnkh more and more resembled not a village, but a city of dreams with massive buildings and alleys. and, of course , a fountain. and it was already a completely different country, because it was no longer a country nep and this country after the collectivization exhibition of the thirty-ninth year. she reported on the victories of the collective farm system, and therefore the appearance of this exhibition was also a triumphal exhibition of the holiday. uh, the exhibition was an exhibition, miracle after

preobrazhenskyi advised not to read the ball council or barmetals, well , the well-known book by mikhail bulgakovon, if invited, you and i will analyze it for five minutes, i will refute at least a dozen messages , dear western media. during the last week, not to mention the month, it is absolutely not certain facts or truths, but it certainly shows that there are special showers information from the pentagon itself, from the us state department, and so on, which in one way or another , in a certain way, reveal certain information in order to somehow influence whom to influence this issue on ukrainian society, on zelenskyi’s office, on the american voter, yes, but it’s some showers are an attempt, let's say, to form a certain information narrative, and if we have a very large such shower of those showers, then accordingly we understand that there is a certain dissatisfaction, for example , with how resources are used, which is provided to us by the united states, that is, well, there is a problem, we feel that it is a partnership, let's talk about the resources that are provided to us, when these

let's now remember the very important words that are addressed to all of us mikhail bulgakov roman thering, torment, blood, hunger and the morgue, the sword will disappear, but the stars will remain when the shadow of our bodies and deeds does not remain on earth and there is not a single person who would not know this. why don't we want to look at them. why going through our dates, i turn to those guys that in the forty-first there were soldiers and in humanists in the forty-fifth, and humanism is not just a term, moreover they speak abstract. i turn again to losses, they are difficult and irrecoverable. i remember pavel misha or boris nikolai, i myself now depend on them that time unwillingly, they made noise in the lush forest. they had faith and trust, and they were beaten with iron or not, just trees. and it seems that we have a fine day, it seems, the wind is pulling towards summer, we go around. seryozha and i, but there is no forest, and eh, there is no forest, and i hear everything. i hear their voices remembering. i'm talking about pavel misha ilya boris nikolai the king hear

foreign ragged preobrazhensky i can only say one phrase, please do not attempt to identify mikhail afanasyevich bulgakovfessor preobrazhensky is far away positive character. you are not very wrong. this is a garbled quote. of course, we won't take it seriously, and we never will. well, the end of the quote. it sounds absolutely not in russian, because friendship cannot be perceived as, uh, weakness. it can be perceived as a weakness only the friendly attitude of a great writer. i could never say so. friendship cannot be understood, only a friendly attitude, that is, kindness , softness and a number of other concepts are not the great chekhov, not the great tolstoy, not dostoevsky, not could do so directly. eh, as if it were, kharkov of the western language to express something like such an aphorism, this phrase is not competently. therefore, of course, there is no way to attribute it to anton pavlovich, there is no way. thank you very much for this enlightenment. all the best to you. we have dealt with this, but nevertheless, we will still deal with ukrainian mythology, because they have already gone so