who have an independent position there, uh, what inconvenient systems there are and vice versa pavlo vovk and some of the judges of the scandalous oasco, against whom the vrp has disciplinary complaints, are still not released. the high council of justice is also considering a complaint against odesa judge lyudmila saltan, who will be dismissed in the spring, they were detained for a bribe of 4,000 dollars, despite the fact that saltan herself admits her guilt, she can be released only after the review of disciplinary complaints is resumed, and when a judge is expected by your society, such a judge should be dismissed from her position, and it is actually possible to do this even without proving her guilt in a criminal case, this can be done on the basis of a disciplinary complaint. and you, the supreme council of justice, cannot do this simply because complaints are not considered by another judge , whose case is currently under consideration of the anti-corruption court, volodymyr pyatkovsky is also not suspended from the administration of justice, although the complaint against him has

currently works without the service of disciplinary inspectors, it is quite clear that not dismissed pavlo vovknd some of the judges of the scandalous oazko remain, against whom the urp has disciplinary complaints. the high council of justice is also considering a complaint against odesa judge ludmila saltan, who was detained by nabu and sap in the spring for a $4,000 bribe. despite the fact that saltan herself admits her guilt, she can be dismissed only after the review of disciplinary complaints is resumed and when the judge is waiting for your society, such a judge should be dismissed from her position. disciplinary complaint and now the supreme council of justice cannot do this banally because the complaints are not considered by another judge whose case is currently being considered by the anti-corruption court, volodymyr pyatkovsky , and he is not even suspended from the administration of justice, although the complaint against him has been pending for more than six months there are cases when complaints to the high council of justice were used to pressure judges to make legal decisions.

judicial system currently works without the service of disciplinary inspectors, it is quite clear that pavlo vovk and some of the judges of the scandalous oasco, regarding whom in vrp, disciplinary complaints are also being considered by the high council of justice, there is a complaint against odesa judge lyudmila saltan, who was detained by nabu and sap in the spring for a bribe of 4 or so dollars, despite the fact that saltan herself admits her guilt, she can be released only after the review of disciplinary complaints is resumed and when the judge brehaba that society expects such a judge to be dismissed from her position and actually it is possible to do this even without proving her guilt in a criminal case, this can be done on the basis of a disciplinary complaint yes and you now the supreme council of justice cannot do this simply because the complaints are not considered by another judge, whose case is currently being considered by the anti-corruption court, volodymyr pyatkovskyi , he has not been dismissed or even suspended from the administration of justice, although the complaint agai

judicial system currently works without the service of disciplinary inspectors, it is quite clear that pavlo vovkome of the judges of the scandalous ooasco, in respect of which the urps lie, are not released disciplinary complaints are also being considered by the high council of justice. there is a complaint against odesa judge ludmila saltan, who was detained by the saps for a $4,000 bribe in the spring. despite the fact that saltan herself admits her guilt, she can be dismissed only after the review of disciplinary complaints is resumed and when a judge takes a bribe, society expects such a judge to be dismissed from her position, and it is actually possible to do this even without proving her guilt in a criminal case, it can be done according to a disciplinary complaint and you are now the verkhovna rada the judiciary cannot do this banally because complaints are not considered, there is another judge whose case is currently being considered by the anti-corruption court, volodymyr pyatkovsky , and he is not even suspended from the administration of justice, although the complaint against him

are and vice versa of the service of disciplinary inspectors , it is quite understandable that pavlo vovk some of the judges of the scandalous oasco, against whom disciplinary complaints are pending , are still pending at the high council of justice. judge ludmila saltan, whom nabu and sap detained in the spring for a bribe of $4, despite the fact that saltan herself admits her guilt, she can be released only after the review of disciplinary complaints is resumed and when the judge is waiting for your society, such a judge should be dismissed from her position, and it is actually possible to do even without proving her guilt in a criminal case, it can be done on the basis of a disciplinary complaint. and you, the supreme council of justice cannot do this banally because complaints are not considered by another judge whose case is currently under consideration of the anti-corruption court, volodymyr pyatkovsky is also not dismissed and not even removed from the administration of justice, although the complaint against him has been in the supreme court for more than six months. there are ca

system currently works without the service of disciplinary inspectors , it is quite clear that pavlo vovk and some of the judges of the scandalous oasco, against whom disciplinary complaints are also pending in the vrp, remain undismissed. the high council of justice has a complaint against odesa judge ludmila saltan, who was arrested by the saps in the spring for a $4,000 bribe. despite the fact that saltan herself admits her guilt to release her it is possible only after the resumption of consideration of disciplinary complaints and when the judge defends your society, such a judge should be dismissed from her position, and it is actually possible to do this even without proving her guilt in a criminal case, this can be done on the basis of a disciplinary complaint. and you, the supreme council of justice cannot do this now banal because complaints are not considered by another judge , whose case is currently being considered by the anti-corruption court, volodymyr piatkovskyi , is also not suspended from the administration of justice, although the complaint against him the vrp has been