or the eca. it was just people vote and somehow it all works out. so i've had to learn a lot of that stuff. it's just a completely different trial. i think you can see that in reading just the indictment in itself. and that's the fear. at some point do we just sort of mix it all together and stop paying attention? i don't know. and then how many limiting instructions are you going to give in this case? is this st. going to be before every witness that comes up against miss powell? which i'll have to object is not relevant to us and impeaching and all these kinds of things. so i just think it would be easier to have a clean trial. it would be i amuch shorter trial in my opinion as far as that goes. so that will be my position and i'll let mr. rafferty address it and then i can address the second issue. >> why don't we just go ahead and since you're up we'll talk about severing counts. i wanted to make sure exactly what you were asking for. is this -- are you saying this should just be a redacted indictment if you proceed to trial? are you saying the

whereas on our side, we don't have an alexa talking about is the eca constitutional?rankly, part of this case, -- i don't know anyone in this room thought about it or the eca. i have had to learn about this. you can see that in reading the indictment. that is the fear, do we mix it all together and stop paying attention? i don't know and how many limiting instructions when you give in this case? i think it would be easy to have a clean trial in a shorter trial in my opinion as far as that goes stop that will be my position -- goes. that will be my position. judge mcafee: i want to make sure i understood what you are asking for. are you saying it should be a redacted indictment, if you proceed to trial or are you saying the state should not be allowed to introduce any evidence other than what mr. chesebro has been charged with? mr. arora: we are asking for a redaction and we do that -- if there is multiple murders and multiple drug you will -- dealers, you block it out and i don't know how to phrase it except severance of count. i don't think they are related but i am

we have a great new function on the bloomberg eca and go, -- eca go. been coming down, if you look at the headline number it is turning back higher and this has got to leave the consumer stretched. especially when you see student loan payments coming back, among other things. are you worried about a recession? >> i think a recession is likely next year assuming that that keeps the policy where it is or tightens further. keep in mind, with a student loan payments, real incomes now are not nearly as quickly as they were. looks like hiring is slowing down, getting that kind of sluggish labor market. also by sitting where they are, the fed is tightening if inflation comes down. will rates go higher, that raises the rate for investment of consumption and their quantitative tightening. where word by doing nothing, higher up for longer could end up triggering a recession in the second half of next year. timing this stuff is difficult. we think policy is restrictive enough to restrict given this environment and we do worry that a recession could be on the hori

i don't know if anybody in this room had thought about it or the eca. it was just people vote and somehow it all works out. and so i've had to learn a lot of that stuff. it's just a completely different trial. i think you can see that in reading the indictment itself. at some point do we mix it all together and stop paying attention? i don't know. how many limiting instructions are you going to give in this case, is it going to be before every witness, which of course i'll have to object as not relevant to us. i think it'd be easier to have a clean trial. that would be my position, and i'll let mr. rafferty address it, and then i can address the second issue. >> i wanted to make sure i understood exactly what you were asking for. are you saying it should just be a redacted indictment if you proceed to trial alone? are you saying that the state shouldn't be allowed to introduce any evidence other than what mr. chesebro has been charged with. >> what i'm asking for is a redaction, and we typically do that on cases where, you know, we have hearings on cert

school is on this treatment and development integration in that program and the consultant and the ecaeties board honoring the lifelong and the chronically ill so leave it in at the end of the rear and the state library and she is the organizing forecast and she writes regularly for the blog and the light long it may. she received two from the history and awards and indiana for humanities and science are. she came with husband and in the background. collaborative first, since 2016 in the struggle society. so let's talk about eugenics. in 1883 it was psychologists term eugenics meaning wellborn. the practice is to improve genetic quality through selective breeding encouraging reproduction with strongest humans and discouraging for the weakest. remote early 20th u century eugenics programs received public support and to two approaches. positive and negative. it encourages people to have above average intelligence to reproduce. negative discourages reproduction and advocated for sterilization and no undesirable traits. court rulings and promoters and early advocates director of eugenics o