after all , mao zedong from the very beginning said that with american imperialism.h edge against edge, and he not only said he did, as soon as it was formed, the people's republic of china was signed a military treaty with us, and already in the fiftieth year, mao zedong threw his regiments and divisions into korea, and there all the time it was said that the americans were about to use nuclear weapons. why didn't they use it, because the soviet union had already received the main bomb and because this is our jet aircraft. she successfully dealt with the americans with the americans and as a result this football match ended with a score of 1: 1, and, uh, many experts believe that by doing so, big blood was prevented by little blood, then, uh, the nuclear war plan was thwarted, which the americans developed against the soviet union and were right. that's intended. was proven, then look, uh, uh , the soviet-chinese split began in 1956 at the 20th congress, when u khrushchev substantiated the thesis of peaceful coexistence and said this betrayal. and in 1957, at a meet

well, the victims of communism museum we call mao zedong the mass murderer in terms of raw numbers. and so he until his death in 1976 doesn't care about individual lives, doesn't even care about lives in the aggregate. and the numbers for him for victims by communism. this there's not agreement because of the way records were kept and also archives that have been and closed and open again but the best range on this by good scholars is anywhere from the upper 40 million mark like 49, 48 plus million to perhaps 80 million killed by communism under mao zedong and this is not just the only account for victims, because there are so people who lead miserable and the the canard that somehow mao elevated so many people of poverty is is just one that we hope that people learn the real history when they come here. one of the goals of communism is the destruction of religion, correct? yes. why? yes, because god gives you a source outside of state, outside of the communist party and the state in the communist party end up being the same thing for communism and also if you've got a very strong c

well, the victims of communism museum we call mao zedong the mass murderer in terms of raw numbers. and so he until his death in 1976 doesn't care about individual lives, doesn't even care about lives in the aggregate. and the numbers for him for victims by communism. this there's not agreement because of the way records were kept and also archives that have been and closed and open again but the best range on this by good scholars is anywhere from the upper 40 million mark like 49, 48 plus million to perhaps 80 million killed by communism under mao zedong and this is not just the only account for victims, because there are so people who lead miserable and the the canard that somehow mao elevated so many people of me here. one of the goals of communism is the destruction of religion, correct? yes. why? yes, because god gives you a source outside of state, outside of the communist party and the state in the communist party end up being the same thing for communism and also if you've got a very strong communist dictator leader at the top, a stalin or mao, then god is also an opponent

mass purges , that is, degradation is in full swing and this has not happened since the time of mao zedongrse now, the economy is also worse, that is, we have a recession and a record level of unemployment , and you are right about the rigon of real estate, everything is not good in china, and what is uryadpin doing , instead of easing the economic situation and or working with other democratic states, on the contrary, they are worsening the legislation and killing their own economy, that is, we now have an aggressive ideology that prevails over prosperity, which actually contributes to that thought, the understanding that china may soon attack taiwan, because, as joe biden said about the chinese economy, when the chinese, when the bad guys have problems, they are doing bad things, well, this is very simplified, but this is all what biden wanted to say about china, they are bad and they will do bad things, well, this will end very quickly china, well news, of course i would like more positive, but currently there are already, wait, literally for i will tell you about everything in a moment

i have read mao zedong, i have read karl marx, i have read lennon, that doesn't make me a communist. what is wrong with understanding? having some situational understanding about the country which we are here to defend? >> the next generation of leaders in the u.s. military, if they are dealing with a donald trump as president again, then what? >> such a good question. i think, but i do not know for sure, that the military is supposed to be apolitical. but donald trump went a long way to politicize the military. in the end, he was not able to do it, because the general milley stood up to him. some of his defense secretary stood up to him. but you know, he went through several of them. he came close. he wanted to fire general milley, but was worried the entire joint chiefs of staff would resign. so, who does he appoint next? we have a new chairman coming up behind general milley , is going to be charles cq brown, an african-american fighter pilot. he is going to be the next chairman, and he will be the chairman for joe biden and for whoever winds in 2024. so, what happens then? it put

we didn't trust mao zedong but we trusted him to follow his self-interest and nixon did a deal with mao that nobody else believed was possible, to say we were going to reopen relations with china as a condition for pulling them away from the u.s.s.r. and that was one of the pivotal events that 20 years later led us to the end of the cold war. it's worth recognizing that even the mistakes that we make often begin with decisions that were the right decisions at the time they were made. but then we had a bipartisan consensus in this country that took that vision in the wrong direction. in the 1990's we had a bipartisan consensus in the united states of america around a philosophy known as democratic capitalism in the u.s. this was a new movement. it is not a partisan speech. it's not about republicans or democrats, it's an honest american reflection. a bipartisan consensus in the 1990's that we would then take the further step of admitting china to the world trade organization. and to adopt the wish that we were going to use capitalism as a vehicle to spread democracy to places like china.

i've read mao zedong, i've read karl marx, i've read lenin, that doesn't make me a communist. what is wrong with understanding, having some situational understanding about the country for which we are here to defend >> everyone is back with us. i remember when that happened, happened before i came on the air. it was an extraordinary moment unsurprisingly "the atlantic" goes deeper. if you let me read this, quote, when i asked milley recently about this episode, his answer was predictably lengthier, more caustic, and substantially more fervent. quote, there's a lot of discourse around whether it's a tough army or woke army, he said, referring to the commentary on right-wing news channels my answer, first of all it's bill [ bleep ], bill barre's favorite word, accusations are coming from people who don't know what they're talking about. they're doing for political purposes our military wasn't woke 24 months ago and now it's woke you want woke, i'll give you woke here's what your military is doing -- there are 5,000 sorties a day including combat patrols protecting the usa and ou

mao zedong political power is growing and the barrel of a gun theme haunts american scriptwriters with of the soviet union back in 1998, one of the famous simpsons series was released, the hero finds himself on board an american submarine that swims in our waters and provokes an international conflict. soviet union will let go of your soviet union we thought we had fallen we were joking soviet union without an elevator and capitalism is pleased with itself wash the frame in the program has already been shown, but every time i watch how they show you a question. all the forecasts are coming true, that is, yes, yes, now then once upon a time they didn’t get good communists to join her. they are now being reborn. this is dangerous for the united states, the new ussr as they are called named after putin, plus this is some kind of red ideology indeed. but it must be said that the german press has written several times over the past six months that the electorate russian. no matter who they choose, united russia and someone else are seventy -five percent red inside, because they had nothing