volodymyr donets worked in the district administrative court of kyiv from 2009 until its liquidation,a link in the circular bail system organized by the head of asko, pavel vovka, in july 2020 , after the release of vovka's tapes, which exposed blatant schemes of bribery and abuse and the creation of a criminal organization with the aim of seizing power, judge donets did not react in any way. but you are not all on this matter , he was silent on the statement from the team oasco with which they tried to refute the facts found by law enforcement officers and emphasized the alleged interference in court activities and pressure on the judicial system, such an appeal was signed as a judge of the district administrative court, which gives us reason to believe that in fact judge donets supported such an appeal, he did not oppose it in 2019 volodymyr donetsk canceled the negative conclusion of the public council of integrity regarding judge svitlana hrabovets , then he did not take into account that the state administrative court cannot be a defendant in the case at all, and the conclusions

unlimited power of corruption, the new court receives old judges. administrative court judge volodymyr donetsstrative court olena zaichko why these appointments do not correspond to the reform volodymyr donets worked in the district administrative court of kyiv from 2009 until its liquidation and there is every reason to believe that he is a link in the system organized by the head of oasco pavel vovko circular bail in july 2020 after the vovka tapes were released, which exposed blatant schemes of bribery, abuse and the creation of a criminal organization with the aim of the seizure of power, judge donets did not react in any way. he did not speak on this matter, he remained silent regarding the statement from the ooasco team, which tried to refute the facts found by the law enforcement officers and emphasized the alleged interference in the court's activities and pressure on the judicial system, such an appeal was signed as a judge of the district administrative court which gives us reason to believe that in fact judge donetsk supported such an appeal, he did not oppose it. in 2019, volodymy

ukraine to pay almost 14 million hryvnias to officials from the state budget, in addition to volodymyr donetsualification commission of judges decided to send one more employee to the kyiv district administrative court themis, with an equally ambiguous biography, is the judge of the kharkiv district administrative court, olena zaichko, among her career achievements is the adoption of questionable decisions, the adoption of decisions during studies that directly contradict the law, as well as opaque declaration of property, for example, in 2020 , olena zaichko made a decision to build 13 hectares of forest, despite the seizure of this area according to another court decision, permission to build clothes in the construction company operative slice, which is included in the zone of influence of kharkiv deputy ihor arikha, it is interesting that immediately after that decision, the minor children of the judge for the testicle received ownership of an apartment from the kharkiv city hall with an area of ​​more than 100 m², also olena zaechko likes expensive cars in 2021, she bought a lexus for alm

administrative court, olena zaichko, why these appointments do not correspond to the reform volodymyr donets from 2009 until its liquidation and there is every reason to believe that he is a link in the circular bail system organized by the head of oazka, pavel vovka, in july 2020 after the release of vovka's films, which exposed flagrant schemes of bribery, abuse and the creation of a criminal organization with the aim of seizing power, judge donets did not react in any way and was caught off guard on this occasion , he also remained silent regarding the statement from the oasco team, which tried to refute the facts found by the law enforcement officers and emphasized the alleged interference in the court's activities and pressure on the judicial system such an appeal was signed as a judge of the district administrative court, which gives us reason to believe that in fact judge donets supported such an appeal, he did not spoke against in 2019, volodymyr donetsk canceled the negative opinion of the public integrity council regarding judge svitlana hrabovets, then he did not take into account