. >> and he said, his name was robert barnes. we didn't know who robert barnes was at the time. parents remembered him. he lived nearby. >> robert barnes would come over and catch the bus with meghan when they were both going to -- high school. >> they were part of that same exclusive art program. megan danced. and robert played the violin. around the school, he was considered an exceptional violinist. there was even talk of him going to juilliard. >> he played violin at a -- school of music. he was honour roll. he was a kid who was going to make the success story. >> and, their worlds would collide, when she was dancing, he was playing. >> i mean he liked music, she liked music too. that's how they sort of click together. >> he'd practice with the bus with us on the way home. oh yeah, he was really, really good. he was a nice guy. he was normal. we blended in. and he made good grades, did great in orchestra. he was very committed to his craft of the violent. >> megan's friend, britney, remembers teasing robert about his crush. >> there was always that time where there was just

so robert barnes and i were both attorneys buy training. robert is still a practicing attorney and we devised basically the, the terms of service, the guidelines for how they're gonna, uh, you know, regulate content. and the most important thing is not having opaque rules that are politically weaponized to suppress ideological adversaries. what the problem was with youtube rules is not that they don't have any, is that they're so opaque or they can be weaponized one way or the other. someone says one word and it does or a sense to ship someone else's exact same word and it deserves amplification. so we've, we've, we've devised these, you know, terms which say, if it's a legal, it's not going to be censored, you know, above and beyond what is over harassment, what it is not what it's not lawful in the 1st place. and more importantly than anything, transparency. so there might be issues where people say, you know, you've, you've, you've took off a video for an x. why is that a reason? we, we think it's a violation of free speech. we'll say thi

barn burners. this is a real reckoning and i think john roberts is in the hot seat because he's enabled so much of and he's going to see if he can control the pace of this revolution. >> when are we expecting to see the abortion decision? >> so the court has not formally taken up this abortion case, but it will. it has already weighted in, halting the fifth circuit's decision that attempted to strictly limit access to abortion pills. the full court will probably grant the case within the next few weeks if not months and render a decision before june. that means for most, if not all of this term, it will be an open question, whether people in blue states where abortion is perfectly legal will retain their access to safe and effective medication abortion or whether unelected judges will pull it off the shelves. >> it's a test of the way we approve our drugs, and whether that gets rolled back for a lot of different drugs, including say viagra. let me ask you about ethics, there is a lot of questions about whether the justices are going to take up a code of ethics, a written code of ethics, do you hav