e.v. chargers. these plants in states like michigan and ohio and pennsylvania and illinois and north carolina are bringing more manufacturing jobs back to the u.s., back to the u.s. that means relying less on countries like china to enable our clean energy transition. if enacted, senator rubio's resolution would undermine this progress. his resolution would create greater uncertainty for our domestic e.v. charging industry, directly contradicting our goal of having this equipment made and assembled right here in the u.s. of a. that's why groups like the this oppose it. it's because its adoption would mean shipping jobs overseas instead of building our supply chain right here at home. so in reality this resolution would actually weaken buy american requirements. it would result in more e.v. charging product being built overseas, not here. and it would undermine american workers and our nation's ability to be global leaders in electric vehicles. put simply, a vote for this resolution is a vote against

e.v. charger reliability. here's a perfect example about how the climate change center is being used to force americans to drive electric vehicles, which is their goal their entire time. the federal government's role is not to change how people spend their dollars and what they choose to buy for transportation. what the federal government's role especially when it comes to the department of transportation should be making sure that our roads are drivable and bridges are in good condition and electric vehicles are heavy. that would put an undue burden on our bridges and on our roads. this is what they should be focused not that climate change is real. we have had tornadoes since the beginning of time, earthquakes and hurricanes since the beginning of time. this is not a new change. it is not a climate crisis. it is called weather and has to deal with seasons and the biden administration has no right to lie to the american people and make the american people fund their lives. how much time do i have remaining? t