, which initially, the munich conference on security, i mean i’m telling her now that it was originallyg the problems of countries, but unfortunately, today it has outlived its usefulness and has turned into a place for one-sided representation of the interests of western powers, which, unfortunately, now have no place for such dialogue. let's listen. the munich conference remained a narrow standard of adherents. transatlantic solidarity, where everyone else was offered a place on a side chair somewhere, to agree with what had previously been worked out at nato headquarters or suppose in the oval office in the white house, but in no way, an attempt to take into account the interests of everyone else, which is why the munich conference failed to become that global, global think tank, that school and thought that it could potentially become, it is obviously becoming a thing of the past , well, the future lies in such venues as the pryamakov readings, well, as the deputy chairman of the federation council noted, everyone will have a place at the primakov readings, at the primakov readings,

the munich conference remained a narrow world of adherents of transatlantic solidarity, where everyonewas offered a place somewhere on a side chair, to agree with what was previously worked out at nato headquarters or , let’s say, in the oval office in the white house, but in no way, an attempt to take into account the interests of everyone else, which is why the munich conference failed to become that world , the thought that it could potentially become, it is obviously becoming a thing of the past, well , the future lies with such platforms as the pryamakov readings, as the deputy chairman of the federation council noted, there will be a place for all westerners at the pryamakov readings countries as well. the importance of the forum is noted by foreign experts who arrived in moscow today. the primakov readings are a very interesting and productive platform where we can discuss the problems of the region. in particular security issues, as well as economic cooperation. this is truly a landmark event during which we can touch on important topics, including partnership with russia. disc

what our vice president at the munich security conference last you called out clearly on the world stage as a genocide. do i think that particular appeal will be the one that will make putin stop this aggression? i don't, frankly, but i do think aboutt it more weapons that a more sophisticated in the time and relevant way is exactly what we needne to do to provide ukrae with a forceful message that will allow them to move forward to victory. [inaudible] >> yes, sure. >> thanks very much. do you want to -- >> for me personally, china is part of russian aggression against ukraine. china supporting russia, not just with humanitarian aid, maybe some experts differ to say this is all humanitarian aid. technologies together with iran, and i think this is really important session, really about mafia style clubs which are supporting each other, and i do believe with the victory of ukraine we will not see chinese investments. because i think china is an enemy of democracy and not just as a communist regime in the last century what they're doing now with uyghurs. i think ukraine which were fightin

for russia is expansion of nato to its borders. 2 years ago they sent kamala haris to the munich security conferencey, we want you there. nato? yes, they knew that if you openly talk about providing security for kiev, or especially about allowing nato to reach the most sensitive part of the russian border, including ukraine in the alliance, and this will automatically provoke a war between russia and ukraine. washington has known this for decades. in the famous message by the current head of the cia, bill burns, which he wrote in 2008 to candalisi rice and others. nato's expansion to the east. it was written: look, not only putin, every person in moscow, even people who hate putin, are united by the idea that any attempt to admit ukraine into nato poses an existential threat to russia and the russians will have to invade ukraine if such an attempt is made, they knew and ignored these threats, and i am absolutely sure tucker that one of the greatest indifferent deceptions they were ready to bring to sacrifice. ukraine for the sake of a retaliatory strike against russia. i think they wanted revenge on

russia is the expansion of the nat. to its borders. 2 years ago they sent kamala haris to munich security conference zelsky: we want you to be in nato, knowing that this will provoke a war. i don't know how else to look at it. yes, they knew that if you openly talk about providing security for kiev, or especially about allowing nato to reach the most sensitive part of the russian border, including ukraine in the alliance, and this will automatically provoke a war between russia washington knew about it for decades, in the famous message of the current head of the cia, bill burns, which he wrote in 2008 and other bush administration officials enthusiastically considering the idea of ​​nato expansion to the east were written: look, not only putin, every person in moscow, even people who hate putin, are united by the idea that any attempt to admit ukraine into nato is a potential. these threats, and i am absolutely sure, tucker, that one of the greatest deceptions of this war are the statements of people who supposedly care about the ukrainians, but in fact they are completely indifferent to the ukrain

karlo masala of the bundeswehr university in munich and nikolange, an expert at the munich security conferenceat they write, they lay out the situation in the event that russia defeats ukraine. they say that if the russian federation wins, ukraine risks turning into a permanent hotbed of instability. he said, no, if there is no armed forces, there will be partisan units, a lot of weapons, and this will create tension inside ukraine. next, in russia, experts expect that in case of victory. over ukraine, the strengthening of russian nationalism and neo-imperialism, as well as the plans of new warriors and the transition to open blackmail, in the supply of energy resources, and the fact that the victory of russia over ukraine would have catastrophic consequences not only for europe and most likely for the rest of the world, write these german experts, the germans are quite scrupulous in their assessments and forecasts, but they model such a situation in which ukraine can... lose to russia , in your opinion, do the leaders of the western countries allow such a scenario or the development of such a

russia is the expansion of nato to its borders. 2 years ago they sent kamala haris to the munich security conference, knowing that it will provoke a war. i don't know how else to look at it, yes, they knew that if you openly talk about providing security for kiev, or especially about allowing nato to reach the most sensitive part of the russian border, including ukraine in the alliance, and this will automatically provoke a war between russia and ukraine, washington has known about this for decades, in the famous message of the current head of the cia, bill burns, which he wrote in 2008 to candalis rice and others. every person in moscow, even people who hate putin. united by the idea that any attempt to admit ukraine into nato poses an existential threat to russia and the russians would have to invade ukraine if such an attempt were made. they knew and ignored these threats. and i absolutely tucker is sure that one of the greatest deceptions of this war is the statements of people who supposedly care about the ukrainians, but in fact they are completely indifferent to the ukrainians. they were read

vladimir putin announced such plans at the munich security conference back in 2007 by saying that heeoccupying ukraine. in my opinion, the main achievement of euromaidan is ukraine's choice to be a part of democratic europe without looking back at the totalitarian past with russia. ukraine did become closer to the eu despite the war and the high cost. there is now a visa free travel ready between ukraine and the eu and just some days ago the european commission recommended that ukraine and moldova open membership negotiations. 0lga malchevska reporting. the bbc�*s 100 women list for 2023 has been unveiled, celebrating inspiring and influential women around the world. among them are human rights lawyer amal clooney, hollywood star america ferrera, feminist icon gloria steinem, and former us first lady michelle 0bama. and in recognition of the disproportionate impact that climate change is having on the lives of women and girls, this year's list highlights those leading the battle against the climate crisis. society doesn't encourage women to go out there and do daring and dangerous th

in february, at the munich security conference, i argued then that ukraine needs a long—term security. following the nato summit over 30 other leaders joined us delivered. following the nato summit over 30 other leadersjoined us in agreeing to put those assurances in place. together we will strengthen ukraine's defence and boost the economy, so they can thrive even while they fight to regain their territory. to do so ukraine needs the city of london, it needs all of you, it needs expertise and capital, and more risk insurance to support trade and investment to keep the ships going. i know that you will deliver. and so will the government, building ukraine's navy, training their pilots and training the soldiers. we have now trained over 50,000 ukrainian troops. president zelensky and i meant to meet some earlier this year. i recall sitting on a mac to fly to the south coast. we chatted and shared photos. it was a moment of normality in an abnormal setting and a reminder of what unites us. in the face of aggression we will always protect our values and all we hold dear. we will stand wi

probably because we managed to get together already in 2007 at the munich conference, we warned returnedthe game in which the recognition of kosovo by the europeans, our operation in south ossetia and abkhazia, a link in the same chain, in which the coup in ukraine and the crimean operation are also a question and answer. and putin, at a meeting with members of the public chamber, repeats: the decision on the operation in ukraine is a continuation of this chain. we had no other choice, because before making a decision to uncover the machine gun, we need to think, is it possible to do without it? no, unfortunately, this could not be done, why, because we are already attacked, you just said that these are ours, as it were, new, but old territories, our historical territories, the people lived there in these territories, our all subsequent... events showed, our colleagues just said this publicly, they considered themselves part of russia initially, but they were attacked in 2014, first they tried to attack crimea, and then donbass, so we spent 8 years trying to resolve this situation by pea

professor of the bundeswehr university in munich, carlo masala and the expert munich. of the nikolanga security conferencet they write, they explain the situation in the event that russia wins ukraine, they say that ukraine risks turning into a permanent hotbed of instability if the russian federation wins, they say it would not, if there is no armed forces, there will be partisan units, many weapons, and this will create tensions within ukraine. further, in russia, experts expect that in the event of a victory over ukraine, the strengthening of russian nationalism and neo-imperialism. as well as plans for new soldiers and a transition to open blackmail in the supply of energy resources, and the fact that russia 's victory over ukraine would have catastrophic consequences not only for europe, but most likely for the rest of the world, write these german experts, the germans, they are quite scrupulous in their assessments and forecasts, but they simulate a situation in which ukraine can lose russia, do you think the leaders of western countries allow such a scenario or the development of such a scenario? w

2007, when vladimir vladimirovich putin spoke clearly with this, so to speak, at a security conference in munich of politics and returned when? when it was necessary to prepare this trap in ukraine to commit suicide , on the 21st this agreement was signed on the means of a settlement in ukraine on the 20th, that is, yanukovych, our side, fulfilled everything, they seized power on the twenty-third and the olympics in sochi ends on the twenty-third, that is, well, it’s obvious that this was a planned action. vladimir. what you heard now in our program, as i understand it, was not a revelation to you, absolutely , you are quite well versed in german politics, but i trust you to make a forecast for the future, in general the role of steinmai, whether germany will be able to free itself from its shackles, well, forecasts - this is a thankless thing, although everything i spoke about 5 years ago is coming true today, then we turned to the right man, my last speech in the bundestag was: guys, you will finish the game, and the nineties will come to us in germany, we are now on the threshold of the ninet

treaty, but our initiative did not work. again, it didn’t work, then they tried to push the munich security conferencethis organization, what is the point for russia then to be in this organization, three interesting scenarios arise here: the first, or gentlemen, the balts, now the finns, to whom the poles have joined, will indeed refuse to participate in the osce over and over again, the question will arise: what is the point then of such an osce with such a big hole , well, the organization of security in europe sounds like axumaron, in the current conditions, absolutely, so remember , eugenics, interestingly, the decline has begun and everything that the baltic states, the same baltic states refused to even sign the istanbul version of the year ninety-nine, that is nato countries received a window for building up uncontrolled armaments, naturally for russia the question arose: why do we need such a treaty, the same will arise here , and why do we need this, we need the osce, in which some of the nato countries refuse to participate, and the other part of the nato countries will we should openly be

conference of thailand. the crown prince of thailand was one of your guests. you know, i think looking for him regularly for 3 or 4 years, he lives in germany in munich. whenever he comes with his friends and employees. i am his german cook and i travel with him. so that's a very nice photograph i was permitted to take with him as quite unusual my home do you normally aren't allowed to take a picture with it and i'm just going for them to us. it seems as if thomas feels like an investigative but the tell you tasked with defending the cities image. see the thing from any think this is the world's biggest jorge, but it's not. yeah, there's far more to patel. you will succeed in pattaya no longer makes up the whole city scraps on it. instead, it's restricted to 3 relatively small areas. and if i, if i don't go there and i don't see a tiny cindy in atlantic destination, but i certainly dominate the downtown district. no matter where you look there, robust with go sitting and waiting for the immediate is fine with the girls. here are an easy generally where few were closed because of the heat that doesn't necessarily have to do with the prostitution. even