last year, the higher anti-corruption court sentenced judge oleg yushchuk to three years in prison forinfluence. the appellate chamber of the higher anti-corruption court left the sentence unchanged. yuschuk's defenders filed an appeal against both decisions. the supreme court satisfied the appeal in part and ordered a retrial. proceedings in the chamber of appeal vaks. the judges noted that the appellate chamber allowed contradictions in the formulation of its conclusions, excluding the protocols of secret investigative actions from the evidence. at the same time, she continued to refer to the content of these protocols to confirm the conclusion of guilt. now the appeal will be heard from the beginning. the supreme council of justice continues to honorably retire with lifetime benefits and retain all judges. privileges, unscrupulous judges, this time vrp agreed to the resignation of the judge of primorye district court of odesa, viktor poprevych. he is known for the high-profile case of activist serhiy sternenko. it was poprevych who sentenced him to seven years of imprisonment and th

oleg yushchuk to three years of imprisonment for abuse of influence.ellate chamber of the higher anti-corruption court left the sentence unchanged . yuschuk's defenders filed an appeal against both decisions. the supreme court partially upheld the appeal and ordered a retrial in the vaks appeals chamber. the judges noted that the appeals chamber allowed contradictions in the wording of its rulings. at the same time, she continued to refer to the content of these protocols to confirm the conclusion. about guilt, now the appeal will be heard from the beginning. the supreme council of justice continues to issue honorable retirements with lifetime benefits payments and preservation of all judicial privileges of unscrupulous judges. this time , the vrp agreed to the resignation of the judge of primorye district court of odesa, viktor poprevych. he is known for the high-profile case of activist serhiy sternenko. later reversed by the court of appeal. poprevych was also released on a small charge. i am the ex-director of the victoria children's camp, where th

last year, the higher anti-corruption court sentenced judge oleg yushchuk to three years in prison for abuse of influence. the appeals chamber of the higher anti-corruption court left the verdict unchanged . yushchuk's defenders filed a complaint against both decision. the supreme court satisfied the complaints in part and appointed. re-examination in the appeals chamber of vaks. the judges noted that the appellate chamber allowed contradictions in the formulation of its conclusions, excluding the protocols of secret investigative actions from the evidence. at the same time, she continued to refer to the content of these protocols to confirm the conclusion of guilt. now the appeal will be heard from the beginning. the supreme council of judge viktor poprevych, judge of primorsky district court of odesa. he is famous. the high-profile case of activist serhiy sternenko. exactly poprevych sentenced him to seven years of imprisonment and this sentence was later overturned by the appeals court. poprevych also released on a small bail the ex-director of the victoria children's camp, where th

the appellate chamber of the higher anti-corruption court, which upheld the sentence of oleg yushchukrmer judge of the lutsk city district court of the volyn region, 3 years of imprisonment for undue influence. it will be recalled that the law enforcement officers detained the judge in march 2018. according to the case materials, yushchuk promised to influence his colleague, andrii sivchuk, who was considering a case of drunken driving for $500. for these money andriy sivchuk was supposed to close the case due to the expiration of the terms. last year, the higher anti-corruption court sentenced judge oleg yushchuk to three years in prison for abuse of influence. appeals chamber. the higher anti-corruption court left the sentence unchanged. yuschuk's defenders filed an appeal against both decisions. the supreme court partially upheld the appeal and ordered a retrial in the vaks appeals chamber. the judges noted that the appeals chamber allowed contradictions in the formulation of its conclusions by excluding the protocols of secret investigative actions from evidence at the same time,