agreement between russia and ukraine appeared, and even before the ukrainian counter-offensive, richard gassished an article in which he said that, one way or another, ukraine might not be able to win back everything and it would be necessary to come to some kind of peace agreement anyway , in a word now, of course, it is against the background of ukrainian small successes, let's say so, but according to the results of this year, we may lose more territory than we will gain, this may be the result, there will actually be a small percentage, but nevertheless, and richard gus, co-author . with charles kupchin wrote another publication called which, which actually, which actually, where actually he justifies the following following thoughts, that there is no weapon that can magically change the situation at the front now, and for also aid to ukraine yes... will only decrease, it is necessary to soberly look at the situation and said that it would be irresponsible to continue, to hope that ukraine will be able to win back all its territories, accordingly calls to move to a defense strategy, whic

a way that and what will come out of crimea , including the publication of foreign affairs, by richard gassticular, also a well-known, influential person from the foreign council. eu and american relations, where they also call on ukraine to switch to a purely defensive strategy to save people and resources, and the article is also called to review what ukraine's success is, and to bring goals and means in line with it, this advice, this skepticism about ukraine's ability to win back its territories and fulfill the points of the plan volodymyr zelenskyi, how should we respond to him, or do we need to somehow adapt to him, first of all, we should respond to the real situation at the front, so we know deeply the situation today, but no one should predict exactly what will happen such an option or model of action, here is the institute for the study of war, and accordingly, such respectable institutions as the carnegie institute or, for example , british intelligence yesterday gave assessments, there are various options and combinations, and we assume that indeed, the enemy has completed the f

that is being discussed in foreign affairs, and whose authors are also well-known people, this is richard gasso be one of those who are in the informal group of contacts with moscow, you know, this group that is often written about, that they are looking for, feeling the mood in the kremlin, and also a person quite it is known, he was in various... administrations of various presidents and now he also heads powerfully public such an analytical center of the council of international relations, it seems to be the name of it, another author is also known , charles kupchen, who worked in the administration of barack obama, in the former director of the national security council, by the way, seriously people wrote, and i don’t know if you saw this post. yes, yes, i saw it, i am familiar with the main theses, the main theses are yes, for our viewers, to say the least, there are several of them, the first is that the expected ukrainian offensive did not bring the expected results, and now, if ukraine further will continue to insist on its version of victory, on the fact that it will try at any cost t