now say one thesis that, in my opinion, was not heard in these comments, in all comments around, zaludzhny'sard for me to imagine that zaludzhny's publication was published completely offline and that they decided to do it without notifying the president or anyone in his office, it's hard for me to imagine that, no i know, maybe it really was, but considering if the importance of this article and so on, it seems to me that it should have been agreed with someone somewhere, if only the very fact of the appearance of such and such a publication, now they asked me, is there a split? there is a split in your opinion, well, i try of course, or not, i try of course, if it were, to smooth out, yes, these are these, well, i would say certain contradictions that appeared, yes, between the position of zaluzhny and then the comments that zelensky himself, and ihor zhovkva, and so on, and i then expressed such a thesis, i said that, in principle, here i am , by the way, i can completely agree with you... agree, because when you commented, you said that in these articles, excuse me and shuster and zaluzh

zaludzhny called it a heavy loss for the armed forces of ukraine and for him personally and added that the reasons and circumstances will be established during the pre-trial investigation. and mykhailo samus, director of the independent platform new geopolitics research network, joins the broadcast. good evening. mykhailo, let's start with zaluzhny's article. so, which of you personally protected it for yourself? and what was possible was written in between lines, well, first there were three materials, it was an academic work, a large one, then there were essays, and then there was also an interview format , a publication, all of it from economics and all of it in different, let's say, styles, somewhere more emotions, where there is more of an academic-scientific approach, in fact, as an analyst, i did not see phrases there that it is a stalemate. in fact, this is already the second, second such publication, i will not say one article, this is a publication, because a year ago, around this time, chaseral zaluzhnyi and co-authors already published an article in which you remember, he s

zaludzhny warns us, what did he say, we don’t know about it, well at least i saw it, maybe two weeksg, it’s a dead end, some said yes, some said no, what do you say, well in fact, when we look at the publications of the economist, there were three publications, in fact, one academic one, where general zaluzhnyi... lays out on such a scientific level what is happening, and what are the tasks he would like to set for the next year , priorities, there are five technological priorities, including in the conclusions he says that in order to achieve a breakthrough, it is precisely a technological breakthrough that is needed, due to the combination of the combination of those technologies that we already have, in this way it is possible to get out of what he says is parity with russia on the battlefield, there is a magazine version , in which...' these issues are discussed more emotionally, and there is another version of the interview, in the same the economist, where general zaluzhnyi really already in such an emotional format tells his impressions of what mistakes he made, in including h

is also a memory. in the nomenclature of those military-technical solutions that are in general zaludzhny'sst, again, the president's task is not to look for a military-technological solution, but to look for it politically, if the president says that he does not want any negotiations and concessions with russia, that is also his position as a person who advocates the territorial integrity of the state, and what should he do as the president, say, oh, you know, we thought here, we will surely give them the crimea for what it is, if we are standing now, no, it will not be like that, any new situation will require new political and military-technological solutions, the first, the second, it is also absolutely obvious to me that i do not even know how to formulate it correctly, that once again the position of president zelski cannot be separated from the position of president putin, ugh, if president putin tells you that ukraine is zhytomyr, the head of the kyiv region, as you absolutely correctly quoted here, what can you talk about with him? he sits to himself, he has some historical delusio

stalemate, in his opinion, when neither side has the opportunity for significant breakthroughs, and zaludzhnys a way out of this impasse in technologies that would be breakthroughs on the battlefield. yes, the war is now entering a new stage, what we military men call a positional war , consisting of static and grueling battles, as in the first world, as opposed to a maneuverable war based on hand and speed, he wrote, this benefits russia, allowing her from...' its military power, which ultimately threatens the ukrainian armed forces and the state itself, and despite the statements of some so -called military analysts in various publications, including in the russian media. regarding the gradual weakening of russia, we have no right to underestimate the importance and possibility of russian weapons, its means, intelligence and countermeasures , the ability of the aggressor state's military-industrial complex, to supply the troops with a significant number of both outdated and the most modern types of weapons and military equipment. we have real assess threats, analyze experience and draw conc