here's arch reader michael conner. see a lot of positives about it. and you know, this idea of like taking a picture and putting yourself in, if it's a way of expressing your relationship with that are. but there are critical voices to exhibitions that take classic paintings by famous artists and turn them into huge video installations are marketed as immersive experiences and solar installations like those by team lab, which feature newly created immersive works. do they both count as are what some practice? some of these experiences are definitive. we are. there is no question that it's made by an artist for the purposes of virtue stick expression and advancing this medium in a new way. certainly when you're talking about something that's being offered as a commercial experience derived from an older or artist work calling that are with would be a bit more controversial. i mean this certainly as in free to colors art, can this be considered new art form your copy? this immersive exhibition on the life of free to carlo displays. almost all of the mex