pirzad. let's start, mr. doctor, where is the problem, that this law has not been implemented as it should after 27 years? i congratulate the islamic republic of iran, may god's mercy be upon him, and i hope that , god willing, all our loved ones will be in perfect health wherever they are. god willing, in a program that is related to the authentic persian language and culture, we will be able to solve the issues as we should and maybe we can. service dear viewers, before entering into the discussion, it is necessary to provide an introduction to the history of the laws and regulations that actually exist in the field of preserving the persian language. let's talk about this matter first, we should refer to the constitution and see what provisions the legislator has established in the constitution in the field of persian language and finally to the laws and regulations approved by the islamic council under the title of ordinary law or the general policies announced by the supreme authority. leadership is comm

pirzad says that maybe the presenters of iran are among the presenters, do you agree ? it was passed by the islamic council in 1375 in order to maintain the strengthening and authenticity of the persian language as one of the pillars of the national identity . i think that one of the problems is to keep a product because its name is foreign and harass the producer, for example, in article 6 of the regulation of the same prohibition law that was approved in 1378, it says that the use of names native and local are in the same place in blaman. well, it looks very beautiful, but well we now want to say that, for example, we have names for our kurdish part like hira. yes, we have a name like ariha. it belongs to our khuzestan province. ilda belongs to our four mahals. my question is that in tehran, there are 10 million people, about 10 million people, are they all tehrani fars? many of them are azeri , many of them are arabs, many of them are lern, what is wrong with this flaw in our law , which says that it is not only there, sir , there is nothing wrong with it. it is impo

pirzad says that maybe iran's executives are among the executives , then you can see, for example, thef the single article at your service in 1375, which was approved by the islamic council in 1375. it is done in order to maintain the strengthening and authenticity of the persian language as one of the pillars of identity well, naturally, the ruling is faster than this ruling, in fact, it is clearer than this one. blamaneh is one of the native and local names in the same place. this is very beautiful in appearance, but now we want to say that for example we have names for the kurdish part, we have a name like hira, we have a name like ariha, it belongs to our khuzestan province , ilda belongs to our chaharmahal, my question is this in tehran, 10 million, around 10 million all those. pars , tehranians, azeris, arabs, many of them, what's wrong with this flaw in our law, it says only there, sir , there is no problem, it can be proposed that it is native to be used in the whole country, it wants to be produced, maybe a if a product is actually produced there, and the branch is in tehran,