remember that someone like ralph shami usually comes in to do the evaluation. this can be a problem that owners are incentivized to plan to not need a 5 species instead of indigenous species because it creates a new type of landscape that could back carbon faster. june robust research has major conservation from an indigenous perspective. critics that use terms like carbon colonialism to describe this new wave of capture enclosure, meet you at a bi capital indigenous in local communities can end up being told how to manage their own land. and often benefits go to governments where the companies with just a small percentage reaching the actual communities themselves. one thing that's never going to go away is the discomfort and wrongness of putting a monetary value on. something is majestic, is this tree, or a blue whale? for now, many decision makers only speaking the language of money, not majestic nests, until that changes valuing nature could make it more visible to them. so should you put a price on nature in many places we already have, but just how it dep

green economist like ralph shami, think pricing natures absolutely necessary in the fight against the climate change . it's not enough to sing songs about the way it's in the gold has the same come by . uh and right. one more pull him about the way you let a team at the international monetary fund to the 1st to put a price tag on a blue. well, with a guy, and if you spoke to a way to say, hey ralph stopped crying about me, leave me alone. go in peace ma'am. and by the way, you owe me money cuz i'm saving you, but i am a team valued a blue. well, a $2000000.00 visa and its activities in the ocean that capture carbon well swoop at the surface. and well, who contains exactly what fido clinton need to grab a bite of clinton and turn produce at least half the world's oxygen? noel's no fido plankton. no oxygen, why do way to repay the wells and the other nature is using that price tied to know the benefit of conserving them. this is already happening in the form of carbon credits that individual their companies can buy to protect an area. here's how it often goes. let's say an island wants

let's say an island wants to profit from protecting it, see grass so month like ralph shami goes there and calculates a value for the c grass. similarly to how i calculated a value for that tree based on that value, a government or company sets up a carbon scheme through which those looking to offset their admissions can pay to conserve the seat. grass and valuations are starting to include more aspects and just carbon in the future. we could also see credits based on how much bio diversity to see. breast supports putting a price type on nature can also help underserved communities. it's estimated that indigenous communities manage nearly $1000000000.00 half pairs of land globally and nearly 80 percent of the worlds about diversity that living nature and intact about diversity are worth money that's ignored in the global economy. the people who conserve them are working for free. one way to change that is to payment for ecosystem services. we are beeping and some of the most probably is present and we should then remind decisive that we should be left alone believe that way, because th