work, but he won, of course, look, despite the convention of mythological space, the method that sergei samsonov could not hold back my tears, despite the unrealistic nature of the narrative, that is, samsonov... becoming full-blown , absolutely like the ancient greek chorus in the ancient greek tragedy, managed to penetrate precisely into the tragic plane, creating, well, a truly great major work, it is very different from the prose of the lieutenants of the 20th century, very much emphasized by convention events taking place, although yes, although there are practical details and a lot of passion , it is clear that he studied the material, it is clear that, by the way, we need to talk about this today. because this is one of the important differences between modern prose, the fact is that the participants in the war, bonderev, boris vasiliev and so on, they do not dwell in such detail on technical details. contemporaries, seryozha, ilya boeshov and other authors, are often carried away by wikipedia. i understand that access to information has become enormous, when you start doing research, you