zulfikari , i am claiming.se companies themselves are like this, but a governing body should actually check this, but it depends on which body it is, it depends on if you have a competitive aspect now, you say that their market is a monopoly market, which means they should compete. we have a fare. there was a mistake in the discussion. now, sir tell me, i will explain. yes , i will tell you. look, we have a fare rate. if this process that these companies claim is a random process that wants to maximize the number of trips, then the driver wants to have the most satisfaction for the passenger. this process will be the same. indirect competitive bargaining , instead of the driver and the passenger bargaining with each other, this actually has an algorithm that actually implements this bargaining. as a matter of fact , they collect their own commission, that percentage is actually the price of the service here, they have a dominant position, and this dominant position may cause them to abuse this dominant position