if the transition unit is smaller then the existing unit, then the rent on the transition unit will be decreased by 10 percent for each bedroom lost. i'll talk about that later. so, going through our households one at a time, our groups of residents one at a time. first we have the pre-dda households. they currently occupy 90 units on treasure island with 192 lease-holders and as we discussed, they are eligible for a transition unit in a new authority building. they may also take in payment off treasure island and they can use their treasure island preference number to pursue an affordable unit on treasure island, so again, pre-dda households could have volunteered for and pursued affordable unit within star view court, but they also if they income qualify to rent an affordable unit or to purchase a affordable unit, that treasure island resident preferences gives them priority for new inclusionary units that are constructed on the island. and as i mentioned, with the mixed households they have been a primary target of the outreach efforts and engagement effort of the ti advisors. which

given the united states own history of religious liberties, how did the people in the united states reactto what was going on in guam? well, they may not have known very much what was going on in guam, because it's so far away. but the guam indians were really organizing amongst themselves for this the right for self-government. they there was the petition that i mentioned from 1901, that was one of a petitions that we know of. and guam remained under naval rule. that's military rule until 1950. this is probably something that people don't know about. guam after 1950. the us president appointed a governor to be the representative governor of guam and guam indians were still unsatisfied. and of course, because they wanted again the right to their own cratic elections. so they elected their first governor in 1970. and since then, guam has been represented to the united states as an unincorporated territory through through the governor that guam indian residents elect. so it became a territory in 1898 and remains a territory today. it does. so we've come to the philippines, which is where th

i think it is similar to the problem that exists in the united states and the united states political establishment leaves the bible. they continue to think that they are the most important country in the world by far, that they can see to call up their opponents because they are exceptional because they are destined to be different than god. like i said, that's the most appropriate description of that perception of himself. so israel this way, the machine is very similar. they see themselves as gods chosen people. even those who are secular and israel somehow are they believe in something which they don't believe exist. paradoxically, or they, they're not religious, but they somehow believe that they are exceptional. that sense of arrogance. and that sense of, uh, uh, exceptionalism in israel, i think, rapes a complacency that is similar to what we try to, to what we see in the united states. and so there's riley's, don't consider the palestinians to be human beings equal to them with capabilities. who can be brilliant. and i think that's what basically destroyed this whole narrative

k was partner with united states in iraq was partner with united states in the, in i've got a son, was partly with united states in my country, syria. so old and oh, it doesn't indicate that the indications are not really positive. i'm not sure. really. 100 percent positive and optimistic about it. however, the pressure by the people was amazing today outside the outside the court. and i hope this continues to model. and i hope there would be further steps because the people have to continue the sit ins and they have to block the exit. absolutely. and aside from the, from any, from the, from the prison, if they try to expedite the him or put him in a, in a plan because they say, if the decision is made to model to expedite him, he may be put in a plan in a matter of few hours, and the stella and his wife and the legal team would not have enough time to take the issue to appear in court for human rights to vocal nasty. i'm at least experts in seriana analysis to tell found the many thanks for your time. appreciate it, a policy renewal. the license on the judy massage cases. we followed

that's not going to solve the problem for the united states, the united states as a declining power. and it has to begin to look at reality objectively. otherwise, it will suffer more than anyone else. all right, right. that's that thanks so much for waiting so patiently before it again, i ask you a specific questions you just want to uh, want to come in on on what you've heard to you the yeah, sure. i think the, you know, trying to build a narrative between good guys and bad guys, no matter who is on the good and bad, isn't really helpful to trying to understand what is going on. of course, both the, your audience and the americans pursued their interests. they pursued politically, economically, mid the territory, how they could maintain as much influence as possible in the, in, in the, in the region. now what's become there is that the americans have had more of an ingle here is to their foreign policy withdrawing at times. coming back in really being unable to maintain strong influence. and if you look at the other side that your audience has, the, your audience have built strong

maintaining the dynamic that it has uh established in uh" and it wants to uh further involve the united states by provocations in the north. well uh taking a look at another uh country here and that's yemen, master shajar, we just had um announcement uh that they had targeted another uk vessel. of course that's being construed in the public uh domain out mainly western once that uh here you have a violent entity uh that's uh that's executing violent uh actions in the red sea and uh affecting the world economy, but at the core of this, the only reason is for the carnage and the genocidal war in the gaza strip, they actually have announced that they will use advanced weaponry, even submarines in order to, because there's nobody else doing anything to stop this war, i mean that's what the yemen army is doing, um, what do you make of the steadfast support that they're giving the palestinians, and uh, in turn, why do you think the us and the uk are targeting them, because we know the us has actually targeted. yemen along with the uk on several occasions inside the country. yeah, you're absol

they will establish a manufacturing unit. it will establish whatever they can and then they will use that for the own intelligence purposes. they will use that for the own economic purposes. they would use it to be able to gain the kind of advantages that they want that are counter wrinkly to the interest of the united states. i think it is very important in those situations to make sure that we are, that the united states and that our intelligence capabilities are being used to ensure that we know what they are doing and could hurt the united states. >> i think worse than the fact to engage in espionage, i think that's just top of the list they will use this in ways that will leverage chinese advantage comp. these plans are deeply dangerous to our national security, and ought not be built. >> thank you. then one last question. one of the concerns you talked about the belt and road initiatives, china spreading money around. one of the concerns i've had in some of our light in the inflation reduction act we provide green energ

when i was young and i was in the united states as a, as a child. you could see that, that sense of exceptionalism existed throughout society. and when we moved back to you ron, after the revolution, as i did increasingly see those, the contradiction between what americans were saying to themselves and what was happening outside of the united states. although i was in a politically aware family, even when we were in the united states. so i was a child. but i think that moment probably was when i, i saw the united states using chemical weapons or the west using chemical weapons extensively through us adopt was saying when there was a decision made by the west to give set up the same the technology to make mustard gas and nerve agents to kill many thousands of innocent people, but also many thousands of them back. and so i went to the city of culture very soon after the gas attack. and i think maybe 6000 people were killed either the exact number as i've never come out. but um, but there was no condemnation in the west during that period during that,

united states. the vice president. the united states. all right. i'll i'll let you talk in a minute. yeah. the vice president, united states went out to a buddhist monastery, a buddhist monastery, and he asked monks and nuns to renounce their vows of poverty, pay thousands of dollars in campaign contributions. so they could spiritually commune with him. and then he said he didn't know where he was. perhaps those folks. perhaps get crowded out here anyway. perhaps those folks in saffron robes and all that incense might have given him a clue. but really, what was most outrageous then, the vice president, united states, goes before the american people, grips the podium and says there's no controlling legal that there was no controlling legal authority for all this these shenanigans all this this incredible debasement of the institutions of government. well, i want to tell you, my friends, i'm going to give him a controlling legal authority. i'm going to give him a controlling ethical authority. and then i'm going to beat al gore like a drum. and send

this is obvious to the united states need this. what for thousands of miles away from your national territory, don't you have anything better to do? you have issues on the border issues with migration issues, with the national debt. more than $33.00 trillion dollars. you have nothing better to do so you should fight in ukraine. wouldn't it be better to negotiate with russia? make an agreement already understanding the situation that is developing today. realizing that russia will fight for its interest to the end and realizing this actually returned to common sense, start respecting our country and its interests and look for certain solutions. it seems to me that this is much smarter and more rational, who blow up north stream. you for sure. i was busy that day. need it and you have to have uh, i did not pull up your delivery. uh, excuse me though, you personally may have an alibi, but it's the c i, it has no such alibi. did you have evidence that nato and ca did? mentioned, you know, i won't get into details, but people always say

when is the united states going to do with the united states pledged to do. defend democracy andy tate -- and dictatorship. >> europe still needs to do more. as of last summer only 11 of the nato allies, that still needs to be done and applaud what germany is doing to get there hopefully this year. there are so many european allies. with regards to the united states, we are democracies. it takes time to get there. so for example the europeans haven't gotten to 2% yet. it takes time to bring democracies along. we will get there with regards to making adjustments. there may be different paths to get there. i'm reminded of winston churchill's quote americans will do the right thing after exhausting all other possibilities. i do think we will get there, it's just democracies take time to process. >> is there enough time for the democratic process. >> hearing about the two europeans here. what senator angus king told me that the united states is 15th in terms of defense spending. and other european countries are spending more frankly. giving all to the 2%. that's

states the united states the seed of a republican government in the world, the united states in 1817, when monroe became president, the only republic in the western world. so he decided to use his annual message to congress which was the equivalent today we refer to it as the state the union address, but it was the major policy statement issued by the government each and everybody paid a lot of attention to it. so monroe knew that if he said something in this in his message that it would receive a lot of attention and people would pay attention to it. a lot of the message was was standard information given to congress of issues that congress would be dealing with in the upcoming session, that the state of the army, state of the navy improvements, the the the national budget, these sorts of things. but part of the way through he was talking. foreign relations and he brought up the subject of a negotiation with russia, referring to russian interests in expanding its territory in the in what is now the pacific northwest east. and in talking about this and about the upcoming negotiations

except the united states of america. and so i want to keep the united states strong. for some reason, people in this state understand. and what i mean when i say at the charleston shipyard or here in this part of south carolina, keep the united states of america strong. i am proud to have served with the president that has achieved something that no other president in the nuclear age is achieved. he's hammered out an arms control agreement that's verifiable and that for the first time in the nuclear age gets rid of an entire generation of nuclear weapons, good arms control, good national security. and we got it because we we understand the soviets, we are tough in negotiating with the soviets. and you, the people of south carolina backed us as we strengthened the military of the united states of america. so keep the country strong. but don't be afraid then to a step for peace. and that's the kind of president i'd like to be. i'd like to build on these arms control agreements. i want to see those conventional forces in balance in europe. i'd love to be the president to

states shah was acting as puppet in west asia for the united states during the vietnam war, the unitedjets that were sold to iran to attack vietnamese and we have passage in the memories of mother that one day shah went to his mother and was quite upset and the mother asked the shah, why are you upset? and the answer was that the americans have taken these fighter jets from iran without even notifying me, meaning the show, so the relationship between the shah and nixon kissenger those years... actually led to the revolution, because what wanted from nexon, after giving all these services to nixon was to leave the internal affairs of oppressing the people of iran to the shah, so cia had huge office in tehran, iran was actually the hub of cia operations in the middle east, and the cia didn't realize... 'there is going to be a revolution until it was too late and the reason for that was that it was an agreement between the shaw and the nexon administration to leave iran alone in terms of how shah was running the country in terms of oppressing the the revolution came in 1979 in such a envi

the united states is a free worker economy.hat's why you can buy land from private citizens in this country. state actors can exploit that kind of systemic difference were to come to the united states, by a huge chunk of land from private owners and that is okay but you cannot do the same in china. that is why the u.s./china competition we talk about the competition with china. the economic, military, really talk about the systemic ways because its function totally differently we have to really deal with the system and fundamental. not just an economic and technology. it is just another member of the free trading system. >> are there be a policy against foreign nationals or at least chinese foreign nationals from buying large swaths of farmland near military bases? >> there are legal ways to do so. through the organization. you have to go through a process to make sure you are buying american assets. part of your properties legally you have no connection with malign actors such as a state actor like the chinese government. ther

so i reiterate the united i that. so i reiterate the united states's— that.ited states's belief— that. so i reiterate the united states's belief that _ that. so i reiterate the united states's belief that while - that. so i reiterate the united - states's belief that while numerous parties _ states's belief that while numerous parties ehgage _ states's belief that while numerous parties engage in— states's belief that while numerous parties engage in sensitive - parties engage in sensitive negotiations, _ parties engage in sensitive negotiations, this - parties engage in sensitive negotiations, this is - parties engage in sensitive negotiations, this is not i parties engage in sensitivel negotiations, this is not the parties engage in sensitive - negotiations, this is not the time for this— negotiations, this is not the time for this resolution _ negotiations, this is not the time for this resolution which - for this resolution which jeopardises_ for this resolution which jeopardises these - for this resolution which i jeopardises these efforts. let'sjoin our

states, a united states that wasn't run by bankers and businessmen, but a united states where peoplecome, you know, we shall overcome, we shall overcome, we shall overcome some day, oh deep in my heart, i do believe, we shall overcome someday, we shall live. in peace, we shall live in peace, we shall live in peace some day, oh deep in my heart, i do believe, we shall live in peace someday. will walk hand in hand, will walk hand in hand, and all the peace shall overcome, he shall overcome some day, what if i all that do, oh we shall overcome some, we walk hand in hand, we walk hand in hand, we are, either you're with us. لو وافق صدام على كل قرارات الامم المتحده وعلى كل ما تريده الولايات المتحده لكان قد اطيح به كان المفروض عندما يسقطون النظام يسلمون الدوله للمعارضه هم اسقطوا النظام والدوله معا وسلموا المعارضه صراع على السلطه اول من وجه ضربه للامريكي. في فتره ترامب جاءوا وقالوا بصراحه هذا انتهى عليكم ان تتخذوا موقف اما معنا او ضدنا. palestine has risen from the ashes, the nation has gone a long way in its struggle against the occupation regime of israel from throwing stones to flying dr

nation is unanimously unanimously have called for cease fire and the united states singlehandedly uh with their follower puppets like the uk have been blocking any efforts to reach you know cease fire basically to reach you know a stop to this uh slaughter carried a daily basis 24 hours seven days a week for the pat since october eight this is the problem problem is the united states and the uk uh wants to flux its missiles on the region and not just on ghazza okay and to come back with their military colonization of of the region. you had few weeks back at this point tony gosling where you had many us officials including including the national security advisor, including the uh um the head of the military lloyd austin who have said that we're going to transition into this uh low intensity phase. since then you've had the icj ruling which came out and said "you know you guys uh israel uh you need to uh prevent any type of genocidal um uh deaths to happen based on the evidence that was presented by many lawyers, but yet from that point as an example uh there has been on and off about

will start investing in europe again , and the united states, the united states also needs somethingeat, from the united states this nutritional base has ended, and if not russia and ukraine, lead brix this year, but at the very moment when they were trying to make russia an outcast, brix colleagues suggested: “let’s russia at this moment gather a dozen countries, and, as always, 30-40 countries who support there will come, gather in the person of the leaders, and we will discuss the fate of the world. by the way, what interesting things will happen this year, and these are just these glimpses of the future of the new world, which does not want, does not want admit the united states, now." they offer to solve their problems for the unfortunate europe. by and large, we are now seeing that europe is deciding on europe the greatest responsibility that no union could handle; it now has to answer for the whole world, despite the fact that god knows what is going on inside itself. vasily, today africa, the arctic, asia are those parts of the world that will attract attention. analyst, we w

the united state by far the biggest ally. it is a great advantage even for the united states. together with native allies, we have said 50% of the world's gdp. there is no reason the u.s. should do with china alone. we are so much stronger. nato is a good deal for the united states. it is good for the european allies but also the united states. i expect all the messages we need from next summer will be in a more dangerous world. because we live in a more unpredictable and dangerous world. >> thank you.

united kingdom makes full points. the 1st relates to the nature and content of the by that true dispute, it is more than a me a difference of use. it is a dispute of acute sensitivity. it is long standing. it concerns the status of israel's occupation. issues of securities and the conditions under which israel 10 and should withdrawal from the occupied palestinian territories. second, the court engages sorry the the request engages that cool dispute to the general assembly box the court to consider the express terms and rule long. but the legal status of the occupied territories and the legal consequences of that status . the quote is also invited to make findings of these really responsibility in relation to its policies and practices. this engages key permanent status issues which are with the house of these writing palestinian dispute, including on jerusalem, on settlements on security arrangements and on board is indeed a key participant, has described the assemblies request as taking the entire palestine question

in the united states congress, must be in the united states congress, must he unified _ in the unitedosition. their opposition to— be unified in their opposition. their opposition to russia's . their opposition to russia's aggression _ their opposition to russia's aggression as— their opposition to russia's aggression as indicated - their opposition to russia's i aggression as indicated over their opposition to russia's - aggression as indicated over the course _ aggression as indicated over the course of— aggression as indicated over the course of the _ aggression as indicated over the course of the last _ aggression as indicated over the course of the last two _ aggression as indicated over the course of the last two years - aggression as indicated over the i course of the last two years plus, and the _ course of the last two years plus, and the last — course of the last two years plus, and the last 24 _ course of the last two years plus, and the last 24 hours. _ course of the last two years plus, and the last 24 hours. and - course of the last two years plus, and the last 24 hours.

, not medium units. everything that basij had the opportunity to provide for working capital, especially small units in this field, has been allocated. well, they have problems in the field of market and trade . they are very serious problems. we have a lot of problems in the field of infrastructure in industrial partnerships, that is, perhaps the main one for us to achieve the goals of our upstream documents, which is the growth of 8. the problems we have in the field of water and electricity supply in industrial cities. this problem is getting worse day by day. you have the ability or permission to solve this problem yourself, or you should declare it and ask government agencies to come in to solve it. mobilization's mission in this area is to make conscious demands. it is a specialty of the relevant devices and this work for the infrastructure that is in the industrial towns , you have done exactly a large part of removing our obstacles to help provide this infrastructure . the result of your follow-u

the two outliers are fiji and the united states. of all the states that submitted written statements to the court, only fiji attempted to defend the occupation as lawful. but even fiji conceded that israel has annexed east jerusalem dejury and that the application of an occupying power's laws to the occupied territory, which is the case in the west bank, constitutes annexation de facto, nor did israel itself deny its annexations of jerusalem and the west bank. its abbreviated written statement is mainly attack on the general assembly. for its alleged bias, it makes no attempt to defend the legality of its occupation under international law. the only state besides fiji to defend israel is the united states. this is not surprising. whatever offenses against international law israel commits, the united states comes forward to shield it from account. here the united states attempts to defend israel, not by arguing that the occupation is lawful, but that it is neither lawful nor unlawful. to reach this conclusion, the united states argue

this is allows the investment for the united states. we're not getting rich out of this, you're not benefiting from this. this is a waste of money and a waste of time and a waste of lives. but it is quite persistent. and one reason why it process is that when the soviet union ended in december 1991, the people in charge and those who came to be in power felt, you know, there's really no obstacle we can do what we want. so part of it is an incredible arrogance, that everything anyway isn't going to be very expensive. these people are not very clever. i, in my opinion, that are in power in the united states. they spent 7 trillion dollars in afghanistan and in a rock ukraine, syria, libya. what have we gotten for it? nothing. let me ask you about the people because uh, the united states, private cellphone being a democracy in the model one. and as you wrote, all those failed war, since 2000 have caused the american people around 5 trillion dollars in direct outlays, or around for $2000.00 per household, there are many indirect expenses as

united states. mcdonald's is also feeling the pinch of the boycott as it has reported its first quarterly sales miss in nearly four years. the reason, weak sales growth its international business division, sending the company's shares down about 4%. other american multinational companies including burger king, kfc, pizza hud, as well as brands such as coca-cola, pepsi, puma and zara that have pro israel estanances or have financial ties with israel and investments there have also come under fire and faced boycott calls. this is the priority list for the campaigners around the world to uh sort of target and we see already uh this is happening and we want to see it sort of taken fair further and escalating so these companies will be punished for supporting genocide. so there is lot that can be done. to further isolate the regime, and one of the best strategies to support palestinians is for israel to become the target of the kind of global movement that put an end to apartide in south africa. people o

the united states is becoming a leader in channeling united states' investments to pakistan. in the last fiscal year, our u.s.-based diaspora investments are in fact remittances, $3 billion, same as in the previous year. to answer your question as to what are the most promising sex -- the most promising sectors, i would start with the tech sector. a small 10 belinda -- $10 million venture capital funding has soared to $4 billion. e-commerce earned $6 billion last year. tech startups covering for an tech, -- fintech, real estate, and transportation are transforming pakistan's economic landscape. this is just the beginning. new technologies, ai, robotics, block chain, synthetic biology, you name it, are being taught in pakistani colleges and universities and being assimilated by industry. venture capital firms from the united states, europe, the gulf, china, and southeast asia are financing these startups because they see pakistan as the next digital hub. which even now has 30,000 i.t. firms and 75,000 i.t. graduates joining the workforce every year. we are training an addition

manner um and for the netan yahoo government anything which extends the war um and involves uh the united states means that there is less likelihood of his own domestic weakness um coming into play um so i think that's why for the israeli uh government it's a case of um maintaining the dynamic that it has uh established in uh palestine and it wants to uh further involve the united states by provocations in the north. well uh, taking a look at another uh country here and that's yemen, master shajar, we just had um announcement uh that they had targeted another uk vessel, of course that's being construed in the public uh domain out mainly western ones that uh here you have a violent entity uh that's uh that's executing violent uh actions in the red sea and uh affecting the world economy but at the core of this the only reason is for the carnage and the geness of war in the gaza strip, they actually have announced that they will use advanced weaponry, even submarines in order to, because there's nobody else doing anything to stop this war, i mean that's what the yemeni army is doing, um, wha

not a sanches potential expedition to the united states. now this cool case like spark to 2010 in 2011. when june, amazon's published i drove of documents which were available real crimes or legible crimes, which is i was committed by the united states in both iraq, afghanistan. so campaign is on for the press freedom organizations on here. this is a critical, cool. this is a cold case that is not just about duty and the phone for the is about the rights for people to publish. information by is in the pro, the public interest. that's nice, i can, but this is an attack on press freedom, exposing things which might be the old lady in the world doesn't go onto here, business religion and loves them as all on supporting the case of joining us all. i me, i came here to london to inform both people in london about the opportunity as well as, but also my people at home in germany for campaigners. this is a heidi political case that maybe heidi charged with the in baldwin all to big powers like britain and the united states, and only to the sides.

you also strongly condemned the joints from you to the option of the united states and the united kingdom against human, which constitute an obvious violation of the united nation. charles is an international law for the mode. they have totally abused security policy. there's a solution 20. so $122.00. these legal, i've shows that we should try to get that c with you as an right on the infrastructure, jeopardize regional piece of security, as well as ppos, a city as tended to international peace and security to us. and you must be out of the international responsibility for the commission of the crime of regulation. a government of justification invoking us think of 51 as a basis for this aggregation lex assorted to the foundation. and cannot, does you 2 minds, this legal actions by the president to day in this chamber the us and you can make, i know the display attempt to distract attention away from the root cause of the current situation in the region by falsely putting the finger and blame on you on it is the full that the united states that put them on a member of the security goals

in and how they have run manchester united up until this point? united up untilthis point? i only — united up untilthis point? in terms of... i only note _ united up untilthis point? in terms of... i only note joe _ united up untilthis point? in terms of... i only note joe and _ united up untilthis point? in terms of... i only note joe and efrain - of... i only notejoe and efrain and they are, despite what you might read in the press, they are really nice people. they are very courteous. and they're very... you know, avid supporters of manchester united, believe it or not. he know, avid supporters of manchester united, believe it or not.— united, believe it or not. he will of heard fans _ united, believe it or not. he will of heard fans very _ united, believe it or not. he will of heard fans very dismayed - united, believe it or not. he will l of heard fans very dismayed about the debt the club has been settled with, the decline and in terms of the infrastructure, it may hold them responsible for that, do you understand that anger? yeah, i understand _ understand that anger

that are with us and other units of the armed forces, i can only say about the units of the steel bordertillery, i will not say that we do not have ammunition , they are there, we use them, but we have a very big... difference from the armed forces of the russian federation, which is that every shot, our shot, it must be accurate. our servicemen, our gunners, try not to fire chaotically, as the military does of the russian federation, and to fire accurate shots directly at the specified coordinates, that is, aerial reconnaissance works, detects some object, and it is on this object that the shelling goes, and the enemy carries it out. with mainly chaotic shelling aimed at scaring the local population, it is shelling not only the positions of the defense forces, but also border settlements, both in the conflict zone and on the state border with the russian federation. mr. ivan, i would also like to ask about mortars, because i heard that in fact a significant part of the work there is firework is done by mortars, what about you, do you have enough ammunition for mortars, are they used in.

, is also a cd or for, for a country like the united states, a decline of the influence of the united states. the united states alliance even have repeatedly expressed the different of paintings on policies. for example, towards china, against the united states. i think all of a wage have forced the united states to change some approaches in order to realize east own interest. i mean, meanwhile, and i'm looking forward to having another discussion with you because we're out of time. but i mean there's, there's the taiwan issue. there is the chip or issue that you alluded to. there's uh, you know, united states military exercises in the south china sea. there's the build up of some of the islands on the south china sea and that whole pacific rim discussion is a fascinating conversation for another time. i will look forward to due to having that with you and a guy is a host and a reporter for see gtm radio. it's a delight to be able to have this conversation with her so that we can all learn perspectives that we don't often take into account. thank you so much and it's a pleasure talkin

cnn that the russian dictator putin will win every day until the house of representatives of the united states of america congress approves a new package of aid to ukraine. let's listen to what the adviser to the president of the united states of america , joseph biden, jake salevan said. the reality is that... putin wins every day that ukraine does not get the resources it needs, and ukraine suffers. and there is a strong bipartisan majority in the house of representatives that is ready to pass this bill if it is brought up for consideration. and this decision rests on the shoulders of one person. history is watching to see if speaker johnson will bring this bill up for a vote. if he does, the bill will pass and ukraine will get what it needs to achieve. success, if not, we will not be able to give ukraine the tools it needs to stand up to russia, and putin will be the main beneficiary of that. jake sullivan says the right words, but ladies and gentlemen, what is the problem with ukrainian the question hung in the congress of the united states of america, it is exclusively an internal

the only way the united states can disentangle itself is if the price paid for continuing to support israel is greater than the price that they that that that that meaning that if the international community starts to hold the united states accountable, then maybe the united states will realize that supporting israel is losing. proposition, but at this point in time the united states isn't paying that price, and unfortunately, i think it's going to be the palestinian people that continue to suffer. elijah magnia, we uh, few minutes um earlier we were talking about uh yemen and uh the response that uh they've given to the uh genocide in gaza, also uh the response uh they've given against american and british ships to the ongoing strikes on yemen, talk to us about the yemeny. response to the gaza onslot, how you view it, and also the defined message that they have been sending to the us and its allies so far. the emini have done incredible work from the beginning of this war, they try to bomb the israelis in support of gaza, but they were faced with the american and their allies interc

if i were an american, after this phrase, i would really tense up, advisor to the president of the unitedllivan , when asked if he can tell the americans that they have nothing to worry about, i say in simple words, can you tell the americans , that they don't have anything to worry about right now with what they're saying is a threat to national security, look, i don't think that 's a question that can be answered directly, right? is true because americans understand that there are a number of threats and challenges in the world that we face every day, these threats and challenges range from terrorism to state actors, we have to deal with them, and we must confront them in a way that ensure the maximum safety of the american people. i am confident that president biden, as he makes his decision, will ensure the security of the american people in the future, and i will stand here on this podium and say it, look at you in eyes with confidence that we believe that... let's start with cameron, that's right, cameron, that's what major taylor greene, or taylor medjar greene or greene taylor maj