the test , or for whatever reason, they can't take the test and fail the entrance exam. and admission to the university remain open, while the supreme council of the cultural revolution of the islamic councilo had a resolution that this year, in fact, in the year 14, in the next year, in the year 143 , the entrance exam will be implemented on this basis. what is your criticism of this method ? now you are arguing that there is an alternative method, is this method that the experts of the supreme council of cultural revolution and the parliament came up with, that we consider academic records to be effective in the admission of our students to the university, or is there a critical section? well, thank you. that mr. dr. jafari said we should let's enter, my servant. well, i entered my first term. i am sure that i will follow this matter because it is a concern for all dear families, for students, for their children. for sure, i will follow this seriously in the parliament. in any case, you have to choose from a group of at all. now, i am looking for the commission of the boje program because i have a doctorate in accounting, but we will certainly be of help to my friends. this is considered

the right to the rightful one would be better here. it is implied that i also asked one more thing. in this resolution. the supreme council of the cultural revolution and following all the approvals of the islamic council, the quota of areas 1, 2 and 3 should not be removed , even now it will not be removed, because if this happens, yes, everything will belong to them. the rich belong to those who can afford it in non-profit they should study in other places, and naturally, what we intended, which is expected from the islamic system , will not be achieved. what is achieved is not what we intended , so our point is that it should, but if we block the way, i will change the point of our good brother. i want to say that we should not erase the problem from that side, let's say now that there is no alternative, this is a kind of erasure of the problem, our belief is that always. creative thoughts, especially those who are young, i wish for the next parliament , where the number of young people among them is much more, they should say continuously, there is a way to improve, how is this? a promise whose at least psychological damage bothers the minds can be broken, but if it has good benefits, keep them and

the field of free circulation of information, even in the field of virtual networks and their official media , this mechanism should be clearly formulated by the islamic council in cooperation with the supreme council of the cultural revolutione national security council and all the media and guardians of the official and unofficial space of the country are informed. find out what the limits of their powers are. some of the cases that today we may mention as anti-national security or anti-social issues may not be in conflict with our national interests at all. you have to think of a mechanism to make our virtual space legal and under supervision. in the same interview, i said that filtering itself has caused many problems in the country. not in general, it should be with special cases to re-evaluate, maybe you can explain some of the angles of these rules that you said. for example, we have some foreign countries that apply this filtering on tik tok and prevent this access. by what criteria do you want to make this work legal ? compilation of very clear and transparent laws and what is the custom of iranian islamic society can be spaced. a part of it goes back to the national internet, a part of it goes back to the applicati

the test and fail to pass the university entrance exam. well, anyway the supreme council of the cultural revolution and the islamic council have also passed a resolution that this year, in fact, the 14th year of next year, the 143rd entrance exam will be implemented . the share of academic records will reach 50% . i wanted to see what your criticism of this method is, now your argument is there an alternative method ? is this method that the experts of the supreme council of cultural revolution and the parliament have come up with, that we include the academic records , effective in the admission of our students to the university, or is there a critical cut ? let's do it, well, i entered my first course, the piece is definitely solid i will follow this matter in the parliament, because it is a concern for all dear families, for students, for their children. i will certainly follow this seriously in the parliament. bachelor's work anyway, we have to from a group of so we hope that you choose education at all. now i am looking for the commission of the bojeh program because he has a doctorate in accounting, but we will certainly be of help to our friends. this is considered a setback . no, i am

the rightful will be achieved better. it is implied that i also asked one more point in this resolution of the supreme council of the cultural revolution and following it. all assessment and exam approvals that the council islamic has that quota of regions one, two and three, they should not be removed, even now it will not be removed, because if this is supposed to happen. yes, everything belongs to the rich, to those who can study in non-profit and other places, and naturally, what we intended to expect from the islamic system. this is that we should, but if we block the road, i want to say the point of our good brother in another way , we should not erase the problem from the other side. creative thoughts to especially those who are young. now the next parliament , when the number of young people among me is much more, they have to continuously say that there is a way to get better, how can this promise , which at least psychologically hurts minds , be broken, but if it has good benefits , keep them and find a better way. he did this way with his creative power and the power of memory that they have, god willing, mr. gudari , in any case, if we tie the fate of our students to, for example, 3 to 3 hours, 4 ho

of circulation they have free access to information, even in the field of virtual networks and their official media, this mechanism should be clearly formulated by the islamic council in cooperation with the supreme council of the cultural revolutionsecurity council, and all media and custodians of the country's official and non-official space. some of the cases that today we may mention as anti-national security or anti-social issues may not be in conflict with our national interests at all. let this be monitored, i suggested filtering myself in the same interview, which has created many, many problems in the country, and especially on our young generation, these should be legalized, neither filtering is acceptable in its current form, nor the release and circulation of information that westerners want, that is, the filtering that has happened now. you don't know the law and the law. filtering in its current form is not my rule. it should be re-evaluated with specific examples. it may be part of the angles of these rules. please explain what you said . for example, in some foreign countries, we have these filters applied on tik tok. by what criteria do you want to make this work lawful and prevent this access, and see that the is