for a child tnk end my life, that's when you say gosh, nine out of 10 tell us mental health crisis.bout-8-8 is the suicide crisis hotline. it avoids people from knowing the number when they make the fork in the 9-1-1 for emergencies. 9-8-8 for mental health challenges. we he me ople wl-call. 8.5million americans that got hem as a result of it's terrible they felt so burdened they felt they needed to call someone and help them with the crisis. we will do as much as we can. the president is behind this and expand efforts. that's one of his unity agenda everyone can get behind and show bipartisan support for t >> we will provides technical advice. be i takeoff the suit, i'd give you a lot more. i'm not a member of congress any more. i'm now secretary. >> i'll try one other. so, you know, cities addiction crisis and feeling overwhelmed consider some, pretty tough policies. you know, most conservatives. thinking specifically of san francisco moving to drug test and welfare recipients from a healthcare prospective, good or bad idea? so, what i'd say, knowing san francisco well, is that we sho

i tnk worth congress to be discussing this.st appropriate way going forward and how this helps every, the whole economy across the board.n i need that is what is so important for everyone to realize is the significant savings that the government attains in the various programs when it comes to the delivery of healthcare and delivery of health care to low income delivf education, , right? we need ali much broader perspective iuc think that what i've been hearing peopleso thant up. >> it sounds like the would be a lot more discussion a throughout this year going forward and lots of wrestling with some of these issues but i tnk be at time but this was a great way to get us some of this and something that i will be looking to covering more of the next few months and we will see where that lance us at the end of the year. thank you, both. >> thank you. [applause] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations]■ >> do you solemnly swear that in the testimony about would be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so

one person, responsibility or that's the responsibility and have a lot of other responsibility a■ i tnkdo work around ensuring how we can help small and medium size and then as far as like hhs i think that we need to make sure we have a robust or beefed up cyber performance goals. >> yeah, whatig like? i know senator warner has floated medicare payment in terms of performsance goals, what do you think that might look like? >> i mean, i could see tieing to it that but also, you know, put together like their network, you know, do we show like the full breasts of what a person has in their -- about themselves and that kind of thing. >> tifittle bit, every year we have predictable cycle in terms of medicare and doctor payments, the administration essentially is to doctors based on formula mandated and doctors and other advocates lobby for effects of some sort. i know you're working on s of a longer-term fix. what do you think that should look like and do you think this is the year that congress finally gets it done? >> well, i did vote with a lot of people in energy and commerce to support

but importantly the thing i don't tnk enough there's a lot going into connecting an auction we can start. if you think about it keeps getting worse and worse and worse. i keeps getting pushedut further and further. our international competitiveness relies on us to have this authority back. >> i think that's a great point too. we need an agencyt in its toolbo meet the demands. and to remain competitive around the world. the chances we will see congress move on that? you give it a higher chance than on reform? i am not touching however i hope the chances are good. there's a lot of self interest ú .in authorities. because of course it can be used for a lot of great programs. if you c■8annt spectrum to go with it. >> potential you could use some of that to fund other affordability programs. >> yes, affordability programs, rip and replace, there's a lot of the the auction.rity legislation and again the longer we postpone the longer we don't have funding for these programs. >> thank you so much for sharing your time with us this afternoon. this is the tenth year we've had the policy. i can't r

here the trees you see on the city forn cleveland, ohio, i may tnk nonprofits and their goal in the next ke sure 22500 families have 100 symmetrical breaking dollars. wireless again because the 100 symmetrical is no for what the 27 phd's, 300 engineers on a wireless team have put together.. >> absolutely and thank you for having me here today. we are very proud, the fir as you may know, we are in the wireless space and in 2019 we did not have a single 5g tower and today we have more than 20000 dollars covering 250 million americans inhe certified by major cell phone manufacturers to validates perfor quality and capabilities of our government and we were able to play on network in record time and when we first were thinking about how to build the network, we made this deliberate decision using open architecture because the want our numbers more secure, cost-effective. traditionally networks built one major equipment filter can be want to be able to have choice and without competition was really important because it's greater cost-effectiveness we can pass on these benefits to consumers wh

. >> tnk you.ood to see all of you out here in west virginia and as republicans and the house come together to talk about our agenda for the rest of this year. it has been a very busy congress. and if you look at with a slim majority the things we have already been able to achieve, and my colleagues have touched on it -- major major policy initiatives that we have pass, s with a five seat majority or a two-seat majority or now maybe a one seat majority we still have been able to find a way to fight for those hard-working families who are -- are sick and tire of the far left agenda of joe biden and his allies in congress that have risen costs for so many things. we focused on energy, passing h.r. 1 to lower energy costs for family, whether it is pumping gas at the gas station or when your payer household electricity bill p people know they are paying too much because of the far left agenda here in washington. to pursue a radical agenda that makes no sense for america, shutting down american energy a

i hope you have a lovely day and tnks to all your new viewers watching. hopefully this i know it's hard to get everything in for the bay not going to be ab to talk're about traffic in the in the bay. sorry ion't tnk that my traffic report here is going to help me out much this morning. >> but, you know, luckily for all of us here in southern california, there's just not a whole lot that's happening out on the roads now. something we've en dealing with so many areas the past few months. unfortunately, just our roads that are terrible right now due to the pholeanrecent storms. more reports of potholes and some flat tires this morning. and there'sust not what you want an early commute, unfortutely. his is over in the pasadena. reports of it on t 210 headed eastbound. it's not the high volume side, but we do have the right lane that's impacted there atill avenue. so just be careful driving through that area. we don't want any more flat tires this morning. so ju a heads up as you are traveling through that to drive slowly and just be aware of the roads. but th

that's why i don't tnk it works to say oh, well, then that's your sech so you're you're liable de230. it's that editorial control, weeding out the bad stuff that was whole point of 230 to empower that. >> i don't know how you could be liable for -- well, i take that back. for fiction. but certainly if it was -- i mean if you back in the day when some written material was consider t be obscene, you put together an antlogy that included obscene material you could be sued. today if you put together an anthology o essays, nonfiction writing, and there's defamation in there, then t publisher coul be pseudo. exercising editorial disetn doesn't shield you from liability. >> not in common law. that's why congress did with 230. congress looked at common law and said this is problematic. the oy y to avoid liability with cmon law is if you act a conduit and let everything in. if you keep out even a little bit of important then you -- >> i don't want to belabor the point. let me say to the sides in prior ses. you say this is just like a wsper basically. it'sik the "miami herald" and the states sa

governor, my good friend, tnk you, governor, you're the best.to thank for you your partnership across the board to getting us through covid and rebuilding the economy and so much more.e same goes for greatr tammy baldwin and your incredible congressman gwen moore. her son here? all right. well, she represents her hometown with such incredible integrity and tenacity. mayor johnson, one of the most impressive young mayors i've met and i met all of them, i mean i. i don't know where you're sitting. there you are. stand up, mr. mayor. tell everyr mayor and they know where you live and think they can solve all your problems. thank you for your support of the city and this project that i'm here to talk about. look, communities everywhere at this boys and girls i've been a gigantic supporter, the biggest in the country. when i was a senator i provided a lot of money when the crime spreesys and girls clubs. what you do is build confidence, you build spirit and a sense of belonging and really matters. this project is for you, a future you really deserve.

justice jackso tnk you.hank you, counsel. >> good morning, mr.hi justice, and may it please the court. government censorship has no place in our democracy. th is why this 20,000 page record is stunning. as a fifth circuit putt,he record reveals unrelenting pressure by the government to erce social media platforms to suppress the speech of millions of ameca. the district court which analyzes records f aear described it as arguably the most massive attack against free speech in american history including the censorship of renoedcientists opining in their areas of expertise. the governments levers o pressure are and nothing much to the first amendment. behind closed doors the governntatches the platforms 24/7, it abuses them with profanity, it rnthat the highest levels of the white usou is considering its options and it accuses ptfms of playing ball and hiding the ball. all to censor more sec under this onslaught, the platforms routinely cave. last month, the plfos told you it isn't -- incredibly important that

andha i tnk, is sort of fundamentally un-amer. combat t. and i'm working very hard to do that.nk, you know, that a company like regneryt this really story history of ishing conservative views for, you know, 75 years, then sort of found itsno■Ñ in any int bookstores example, many books that that they publish. i mean, i didn't really know the details, but i could see from the books that i was publishing. so when i published robert f kennedy's book, the real anthony fauci, you know, it was the bestselling book in america. in its first week, it sold 93,000 copies. the new york times bestseller list made iat number accept an r it. big tech it. so it was censored in every possible way. it got no reviews at all. totaledlackout because it was labeled as misinformation, which by the definition that was prevalent then, whicht contradid statements by dr.ere pese misinformation. he represented and that was that was where where, you know, then to. so a book that contradicted him even just by the title. so you didn't have to read any of it to decidet. and the title itself was misinformation

. >> tnk you for erything you've done. for the trailblazing you've done.ave you here. thank you. [applause] ■ >> thank you, everyone. [indistinct chatter] >>ou so much. thank you. [applause] announcer: congress returns tuesday facing another deadline of midnight eastern friday to fund t government d ert a shut down. the hoe back at noon eastern. later in the week, members will ten legislation requiring the homeland security department te into custody undocumented immigrants who have been charged with efwhile in the u.s. the bill is named after -yr-old nursing student lincoln riley who was killed in athens, georgiae country illegally. thursday lawmakers will meet joint session in the house chambetoear president biden deliver his state of the union adess. the senate also returns tuesday at 3 p.m. eastern. they will consider several of president be's executive nominations and vote to reauthorize a law compensating americans exposed to radiation by the federal government. watch live coverage of the house on c-span, see the senate on cgrsionalnd a reminder you

francine: do you tnk there's a difference being a leader in 2024 to what it was like in even 2010?s leadership or chief executive jobs need to come with more of a sense of purpose and kind of more morally leading? robyn: i think that i don't know a different way of doing it then the way i do it, and that is with a sense of purpose, for sure. when you speak and you are in charge of an organization, i think it is incumbent upon leaders to be enthused and to be passionate and be engaged. i think when times are tough, when things are tricky in the world, i think it is important that you know that, and that you acknowledge that in your organizations. and we have had some tough times in the world. beyond markets, in the world, for people to live their lives. we run global organizations with people who come from places that are now in war zones, or that are too close to borders where there are war zones. no to you? yes. how much do you think of that? i've actually been, you know, it's less likely -- i mean, my executive team might get cross at me saying this, but it is really not the most

martinez: i -- tnk that a court looking at that statute would try to determine the best meaning of the statute, and e best meaning of the statute there would be that -- that the use of the term real -- "reasonae"onfers upon the agency discretion to choose among certain pocyptions. now that doesn't mean that the en can just do whatever it wants because there are limits, and e urt has to police that limits. michigan versus epa is gd example. congresssea broad term like "appropriate" and the question was -- whichs milar to "reasonable," in giving the agency -a range of discretion. but, at the same time, when the agency said, well, we don't have to consider costiniguring out whether something is appropriate, the court said , that, as a legal matter, the stnterpretation of the word "appropriate" in the conte o this statute requires the agency to consider costs. chief justice roberts: well, what if the statute yshat the agency can regulate truck -- uclength for vehicles that travel in interstate commerce and the's a question whether or not interstate commerce -- the -- the delegation for int

what's your expectati f case that comes down at 10:00, what do you tnk henry olsen?the questioning, it would be■ay. the question is going tomber ofa 6-3 or 7-2 decision? or will it be unanimous that the democratic justices goes along with that. a unanimous decision has to move in a way that makes]s those justices happy. i would expect that we will possibly see that unanimous decision. but i think there are many grounds on which they couldentet that will permit trump to be on the ba know which one of those they're going to take. host: on donald trump thfar do u guest: i do not think thet president is above the law. i do not should be prosecuted for official decisions that they made without serious knowledge that t intended to violate a law, especially if that law were something that were not politicallfrch is to say in the reagan years■é we had the boland amendment that banned aid and he always argued he did not knog the boland amendment. that's a political thing and he shouldn't be held liable for that. but certain things the president does that are notithin the scop

>> tnk you for the question, senator fischer.y one of the first to receive the out brief wrong when it came to the results of the commission. it validated many of the things that in-house and strategic command in regards what do we do with the current arsenal? i have memorized what i would consider pages 48 and 49 of the commission which has 81■a recommendations. of those i have prioritized what i think should be thanks we get after first. i do believe that we need to take serious consideration and see what uploading and the icbm looks like and what does that come whatat does it take to potentially do that. i do believe we need to have a conversationon in regards to how do we of the report also says the importance of having a credible and effective conventional force, part of that is looking at and ensuring that we have the right long-range standp, conventional weapons as well, that can be placed on a bomber as an example. and then look at what does all legs of the triad triad ln regards of capacity and how can you expand capacit

think -- i am not trying to brag, but i think i had a i tnk it would have been good fory father to havede. i wantedo ing daniel l berg, who was very involved -- daniel ellsberg, who was very involved in the nuclear movement, to the white house. i had a whole roster of people i wanted to bring to have these conversations, and obviously that died on the vine after helenalcott's meinother issue ye about,, quote," y would probably be amused that after my public rebellion against your policies, have occasnally taken on the task of trying to explain a few of your positions, simply to shed light on how i feel herrived at some of them. likeboion. i have peeled away the layers of rigid disagreement that always weigh us down, looking for stories underneath. when you are governor of california and in abortion pill is on your desk, you wrote a e hours used and in contemplation over a woman's intimate decision to end the pregnancy. you ended up sending a bill that for e rst time, allowed abortions for rape, incest and dangerous to the mother's physical or mental health. patti: yes, that abortion pil

countries are maximum flexibility to align their interests in any particular -- in any direction they tnkantageous to them. nobody is going to line interests in one direction or the either. in that sense there's a new world order already. it's not a binary world anymore. and there is a very strong tendency particularly in the united states and europe to look at the world in binary terms but most of the countries in the global south i dare say do not look at the world that way. >> one would think maybe that this kind of dynamic you're talking about where countries in a negative sense perhaps it's a lot to deal with have to think about dealing with the united states and china simultaneously but there's also benefits to that as there was during the cold war in terms of playing the united states and china off one another and gaining benefits perhaps? >> i don't think it's so simple. i don't understand why you say if i heard you correctly it's difficult to u.s. and china simultaneously. it's not a binary choice. i think this idea that you play one against the other that's a -- you'll get into

i tnk that's what the bri is.ysical element of the belt and road the connectivity, the infrastructure and sotu those are physical manifestations of this concept but fundamentally the belt and road is fundamentally an idea. nk it's going to live on. now, certainlyin there's less -- we've only seen this with african countries right? a kenyan government has been trying to get china to extend -- i mean these are very, very clear whether the chinese would do that. of the governments of and trying to get china revive the zambia and what we are not the only one spirit we see this in a room. we sit in nicaragua. they are all basically thesete governments have become much tighter in terms of the diplomatic terms of the way they're trying to get the chinese government to find different initiatives in the context of an economic slowdown. so i think we're going to see less to do think it's to be much more targeted. hink what has happened is the belt and road has encountered problems along the way problems in terms of, you kno

. >> i tnk the no labels thing is very idealist. it is not pragmatic.bout the two-party system but there is no way to beat it. reporter: she told me that the -- that a lot of gop voters that voted for nikki haley in the republican primary which are voters that joe biden will be targeting, that they are potentially susceptible to a third-party candidate especially if it is a republican leading that tickets. as you know that could have a significant impact at the margins in those battleground states. geoff: thanks as always for that great reporting. ♪ amna: from drafting iraq's constitution dead testifying in the 2019 impeachment inquiry into former president donald trump, noah feldman has dived deep into the intersection of power and ethics. in his latest work he turns doubt work on his own jewish faith to understand identity, politics and culture. i recently spoke with him about his new book "to be a jew today." when asking the central question of your boat, what it means to be a jew today, you ask if there is one unifying theological view? i want to su

[applause] and tnk bipartisan infrastructure law, 46,000 new projects have been announced all acrossi noticed some of you strongly voted against it. i'm with you. if you don't want that money just let me know. [laughter] roads and bridges, ports, the transit system removing so every child drink clean water without risk of brain damage. [applause]oviding affordable hid internet every american no matter where you live, urban, suburban, and red states and blue states, record investments in the tribal communities because of my investment in family farms read by my secretary of agriculture knows more than anything we are better to stay so our grandchildren don't have to leave to make a living. they a story is belvidere, illinois home to an auto plant for nearly 60 years. before i came plant was on its way to shutting down. thousands of workers feared for their livelihoods. hope was fading and we raised repeatedly with auto companies knowing unions would make all the difference. uaw worked to keep thela open and get these jobs back and together we succeeded. instead of auto factoring shutt

pitical quote that you find any normal article like a normal article wod you like boom, , here's what i tnkoment in time. in reality people change their minds. they vacillate come different things happen and they react to the news. i really saw these people as bellwethers, of american public opinion and in many ways better bellwethers tha own social circle. my social circle i don't think i interact on a daily basis with anyone who doesn't have a college degree and yet two-thirds of americans don't have a bachelors degree. that was stunning for me to learn in the process of writing this book. but to get give back to you, i think that from the perspective of a lot of the workers especially the white men, they were seeing their earning power go down, their union power go down. they had seen nothing but losses essentially in their wages over 30 years. they were very pessimistic about the future. because the future, the whole concept of optimism isn't about where you been. it's about where you're going. and so in many ways the black workers were more optimistic about the future. it seemed the el

i tnk us to be understanding what are the properties across each of these layers.ntitrust and competition will be sufficient to discipline market power and the abuses that can follow? or do we need an additional set of policy tools and levers of the time we traditionally applied in somewhere of the infrastructure markets? >> i want to dig into two pieces ofhave lots of time for questions and we'll take them virtually too. we'll open it up in about 15 or -- in about 10 or 15 minutes. this idea that companies are not country, nor should they be really, that's fundamental. how can we expect them when they are in, many big multinationals are in 100 mark, 120 markets. a lot of them are in china. a lot of big tech companies would like more business in chin how can we couldn't count on them being national champions even fa that were an argument we're willing to accept. it's because if companies become national champions there would be more limits on what they could or couldn't do overseas, yeah? is that something orr hearing? what sides of that argument resonate to you? >

what do you tnk is a place th a fiction you see the end of switches. it's going to take more people have been predicting the end of buttons switches for a while now and the most recent was gestural controls in video games. maybe some gamers here. but you know the nintendo wii, we're going to use natural we weren't going to have to do this the whole time and it had its moment■ where's the nintendo we now at the very bottom of video game sales what are most people back to if not your traditional kids keyboardse quirky keyboard. right. and and the mouse. so it if you're you're asking me to predict the future, i would say got a lot of room to run and i you know, i think that why gamers went back to kind of crude interfaces is not that they settled for it it's that they wanted it that it gave them something, it afforded a kind of satisfaction they actually weren't getting from all this sophisticated control and just add to that, you know, if you think about a video game with, the visual, the audio anxqd the haptic touch, the audio has been lifelike a long t

>> i tnk seriously, and i take their -- jilling brand quite seriously. the nat to open up the world of crypto to th■-e sene,ld be commended for r engagement. i think they're quite impressive in theirhe knowledge on this, ad i have enormous respect. they're great partners in this. andn senator sinema has been wonderfully helpful. coins. especially on s so we've got, we have got a good understanding across the capitol. the terms of this, like i said,r for all of us. the knew wants here are real, but things that we know how to -- i think we would how to resolve if given a deadline and a way to get through the process. >> i think we are about to get the hook. i have one more question for you your successor on financial services, do you want to make an endorsement right now? [laughter] >> no. [laughter] >> that'd be amazing if you just said yes and decided to do it, wouldn't it? so yes., that'd be great. [laughter] but, no. what i would say about this is as my predecessor,eb hensarling, he gave me every opportunity to attain the chairmanship. and i've given b

larson: tnk you, mr. speaker.umber one anti-poverty program for the elderly and america number one anti-povey program for children. that, of course, is social security. i want to commend president biden. i commend him for putting making sure that social security is solvent into the next century and making sure that benets. and he did so b saying we do something that'sery commonsense and practical. the cap on ppl ming over $400,000. now, most cdon' realize that thn a cap on social security. but why is it thatll individuals shouldn't hav to pay into the system? we have a pter here, and■ god bls these weahy indiduals that are able to achieve gre success in vast sums o mon, but whi should a pson making $30,000 or $5000 or $100,000 payzocial security when the wealthy individuals will p about a minute into the beginning of t ju last month was the last time that milonaires would pay anything into the syste said, ls scrap the cap on people over $400,000. i have manyown hal where i ask people in the audienc raise your hand

volueer work, the young professionals that made a difference in the urban league movement, and i want to tnkou all. we are just starting and we will continue to grow and then with us here in the building and maybe some ith room, we had a number of students that are a part of our business executive stage program. any students here are they otherwise engaged we have one or two students here. [applause] let me make sure i get the schools we have mainly from the dmv who are with us tonight and they are here from howard state, delaware state and morgan state. give it up. great universities making a difference in the lives of our people, and i want to saluteo■p them and thank them and i will be spending some time with them a little bit later. it's an honor, always an honor to be able to present the state of black america. and it is always important for people to know what emanated. where did this notion of the report, the state of black america come from and it was 1976 we anticipate in a few days the president will give a state of the union address. very important time when you hear from the pres

. >> tnk you, thank you, mr. chairman.n president putin probably believes, quote, at his a winning the war in ukraine is paying off and the western and u.s. support to for any of you, what lessons is putin taking from the u.s. failure to further support ukraine in itsight for national survival, and what lessons might china a's xi jinping -- china's xi jinping learn from this glad to address your question. i just returned from my tenth visit to ukraine during the course of the war, and, y that we're at an important crossroads for ukraine, for european security and for long-term american interests aroundhe world. i think down one road with supplemental assistance approved by the congress lies the possiba strategic success for ukraine with and a strategic loss for vladimir putin's russia. it's our assessment with supplemental assistance ukraine can hold its own on the front lines through 2024 and into early 2025. finish that ukraine could continue to exact costs against russia not only with the penetration strikes crimea, but

. >> i tnk the people of china for their statement. malta. amb. frazier: malta thanks the united states for proposing this draft of tmalta voted in favor. we regret that the veto has prevented its resolution. without commenting on resolutions 2712 and 2720. position that a immediate and permanent cease-fire is the only avenue through which we can prevent the further deterioration to begin addressing the impact of the israeli-hamas war. we impress upon them to negotiate a deal which allows for the release of hostages we will continue to reiterate our call on hamas to release all hostages unconditionally. we recommend that hamas condemn the attacks in octoberincludings in the sexual violence committed. we recognize that this text confers on the g offensive in teraza and the consequences for the 1.5 million, the majority of whom are women ahowe perceived to authorize any ongoing or future military operations into rough and anyway. we believe the draft should have had stronger and more reassuring language on this matter. we underline the f

whwe tnk? which again, is a concept we still see stay true today, right? we don't just always just pick someone up. just go to the hospital as fast as possible. there's a few things that we do. why do we take few of those extra minutes? what do we think of fumbling out side of the road? i got stabbed. what am i actively doing? what's going to me? bleeding and bleeding out, right? how do you save my life? trying to. yeah. some kind of bleeding, control, bleeding. stop edge thing. now, let's say if you're goal was just i got to take this person from a to b and do nothing else. i just got i just got to get in to the hospital. the doctors will be able to figure this out and fix what am i doing actively going from point a to point b, i'm bleeding out. am i going to make it to point b? hopefully, but maybe not, right. so that's why this concept of delayed evacuation the delayed evacuation was more for stabilize zation of the patients. right stabilizing our patients initially and then moving them so that yeah, there's better chance of survival because we got us t

at tnk you are pointing to is that they pvid services on their own.ere relying on. they were providing services to people to help them rent apartments. so that is a very important distinction from here. separate from the individual attendancelaims of standing based on wasted resources, their resources. the organizations areotosing anything. their job is to do extl what you are talking about and they are doing it. th are investigating certain problems but that is not an injury that is her address above by this by vacating this rule. >> a couple of things, your honor. where the court system did not economic nature of the interested housing, again, you have to look t underlying embrace. thespect to our injury. if the regulations are put back place, the protections whereby individual abortion providers would provide o organizations with more accurate information. >> council, can i ask you about the remedy? blto object for two reasons. one is the emergency nature. many womgo to the emergency room and if wenk about what that might look like, take dr. franci

why do you tnk we have a number of dwindling police officers?ronments created by the havl experience. >> exactly right it's the rhetoric into the policy that's being created. it's the rhetoric that is here n capitol hill, by anti-cop people throughout this country and the policies not only policy because now we are talking aboutar but actually things on the books people took pens come up with them to paper and passed legislation to make the country less safe to make the■bnforcemeo give criminals free reign to do whatever it is they want without any repercussions.e on capitol hill you can't go to cvs and get a batteries because they are locked up because people go into stores and take whatever theyal. that is the country. that is the city that the democrats have created. and i blame it and say it's partisan because they are the ones that have carried the banner and have passed this legislation and they are the ones that have doubled down and said we are going to connue to do this. my time is expired. i will yield back. >> thank you mr. chaÑ■matne

. >> tnk you, sir. >> thank you, of course. you're recognized for five minutes. >> good morning. mbe dists of the consumer financial protection bureau and inclusion. thank you for being able to take part in this hour. i'm a policy analyst at cato institute center for monetary and financial alternatives. ■9l the views that i express today in my testimony are my own. consumer financial protection bureau for providing supervised payment app, for reasons laid out in my testimony, it since the launch of the first payment app these tools have been highly successful satisfying demand. the cfp this well. more than 9 in 10 u.s. consumers report a digital payment method and reports of digital payment app. in recent years, cryptocurrency or defi keep the united states at the technology frontier. the first payment3vool to benefit entrepreneurs and consumers. unfortunately the cfpb's larger participant rule takes the utility and popularity of digital payment tools as the reason to subject them to greater scrutiny. it would target market success, not market failure. the cfpb does not identify

and so tnk, if -- if -- if that's kind of what -- justice sotomar:ell, that's the court's creation. rtez: right. but it's the court's creation because it'trying to solve the fundamental problem, which is that chevr idoing something very weird. it's taking interpretive authority atelongs to courts and it's giving it to agencies. so all of these bells and whistl a efforts to kind of claw it back to address the symptoms, but i think it's time for the courtoddress the disease, the underlying problem, which is chevron itself. chief justice roberts: justice kagan? justice kagan: mr. martinez, i want you to think of this from congress'pepective. so i was thinking what is the next big piece of legislation on thhozon and who knows, don't have a crystal ball, but i'm going to say -- i'm going to guess that it's artificial intelligence. so let's imagine congress enacts an artificial intelligence bill and it has all kinds of delegations, maybe it creates an agency for the purpose or maybe it uses exti agencies and it has all kinds of delegations to that agency or agencies about how rulate artif

john in florida, tnk. west virginia, james comer republicans line, hi.marjorie taylor greene is doing a pretty good job. and the house speaker is doing a good job, too and he needs to stay in there. the public. there are so many bills that they have to make up their minds on. these congress people, they get paid every day of the year. why haven't they provided us in the poor sections and take four of those things they want to pass at a time and they will not have to pass all of these bundles that nobody knows what is in them because there arsohoe changes as to how appropriations get past general, and if you change that, maybe it will prevent things from happening like we have seen in the last few weeks? caller: yes, they don't need to be on tv doing all this stuff so people can see them they need to do it four times a year a set of doing it all at once and nobody wants to pass it because there's too many things in them. look at the money for all these immigrants coming across the border, we are given of all of this money and taking care of them. and we a

>> tnk it was first raised in distric court. we think exhaustion does not apply for two reasons. first it would be gay futile this is a whole another kettle of fish. if youat section 7 exhaustion is only required in o instances. this is consistent. the lower court have taken opinions. eris no is often requiredr agency will that stays the eceding. >> pi ask about the traceability of it all? i want you to tell me if you agree with this understandg. eveneyd proving whatever injury you are part -- whatever injury you are trying to prove, you have to shift that injury is traceable to the 2016 and 2021 fda actions tt u are challenging and of course that meanshing that these incidents you are talking about in the emergency room are caused by whatever incremental increase and risk there is as a result. i guess my first question ido you agree with that statement? what do you need to show? and if you do, how do you satisfy that? why do you satisfy that? twice we believe that we need to show the 2016 and 2020 one action increase the risk of harm. >> i guess we are saying you have to link wh

now as he enters retirement, i'd tnk diaz for his hard work and dedication to the university of georgiaathletics. through his guidance and supervision, his of the nation's greatest. thank you mr. speaker and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purr. speaker i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and to revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, gentlewoman 1. the gentlewoman is recognized for one minute. >> i rise to commend the secretary of housing and urbant, martha fudge. as secretary fudge retires i join people from the white house to warrensville heights in celebrating her lifetime of service and achievement. ms. brown: under her leadership, h.u.d. helped more than two million families stay in their homes and served a million people experiencing homelessness and helped black owners rochester purchase a home. secretary fudge has been a champion for her constituents and has always been about results. quite simply in congress and the cabinet, she set the standard and i to follow as her representative of the 11th congressi

so again, tnk you. >> thank you, senator. been a lot of talk about what to do with national security and you made a clear statement no one wants to cut to benefits. let's go to the other hand and make it solvent. talk about the impact and how much would we need to keep it solvent because it does go broke here before we know it it's 2034?■- >> yes sir. >> can be specific on what it's going to take to make it solvent. >> let me be very clear it's not prected to go broke. as you said, 23%. >> to avoid a 523% cut that is currently scheduled 2034, congress would need to make some changes in order to extend it. >> would you be specific on what that would be so we could hear it? >> yes, sir. what has been proposed as once people make $400,000, pay into social security. >> what percentage would that be if that group started paying what would they have to pay into, what percentage of that income would it be to get it >> senator i came here mostly to talk about the customer service things. if there's any other tool in addition to just

i tnk that's pretty obvious.n trump and tiktok, it was fascinating sounds like an off the cuff issue for trump and not something he's going to with people who don't agree with him on this issue. so thank you very much for listening and participating in our first livee. i'd like to welcome now politico's global health reporter harmon hahn to the stage for the next conversation. thank you all. s h know you listened to a very interesting conversation. my name is carmen hahn, a reporter at politico. today we're going to be speaking to u.s.a. administrator samantha powertually and we're grateful for her to make the effort to talk to us even though she's not here in person. there shes. hi, administrator. welcome. i'm going to sit down. so we have a lot of things to talk about today. and it's probably going to be quite ambitious for 20 minutes but i wanted to start talking about your work responding to the humanitarian and health needs in gaza to the reality we're facing globally post pandemic. we had a major shock, a h

chief justice roberts: tnk you, counsel. rebuttal, mr. fletcher. mr. fletcher: thank you, mr.with a few points, then address the merits, then step back and talk about the bigger picture. the first on standing, i have to start with a clarification about jill hines' emails, pages 793 to 794. i misunderstood what my friend alluded to earlier. i thought that was twitter, not facebook. i appreciate his clarification. ÷6 been insistent, i wanted to make sure i did that, too. i do not think that changes the fundamental point because we are talking about an act of moderation in april 2023 years after the last white house or any government speech targeting mr. kennedy's content, which happened in 2021. justice kagan pointed out the issue, which is they are trying to draw a line between the governments acts and the em through timing, and the timing is not very good. i want to talk about the two best examples he gave you, the one being ms. hines' group. justice kagan, you pointed out her groups were moderated two and four months after the relevant exchange between facebook and the govern

i'm not aware of tt, b i don't find that concerning, because -- >> well, as textualist, you have to tnk. >> that's right. when you look at the phrase function of the trigger, as i was sayi elier, and justice gorsuch made this earlier, functi othe trigger means trigger, we talked about this before, trigger has to be the subject of function, it can't being the object. right, so the follow-on question is just focus on the phrase, and i'm staking the point i don't think anyone said this at the time, which doesn't defeat your argunt i'm not suggesting it defeatsump your argument if people were drawing that distinction. >> it certainly would help. but e rase, given the way i's written right now, and the impossibility textually of trngo make the trigger into an object of the vb >> and no one was drawing the distinction, why would congres have drawn that distinction? your big pointweot to look at 1934, we got to look at what congress wrote, why would congress have drawn that distinction in 1934? >>ecause they wanted to get the fully automatic weaponwh had the push triggers. and if you u pull of

chairman tnk of it this way, a federal building with an only have 90 people working in it on any given workday. that is just ridiculous, frankly. that's why i've offered my amendment which would build on the underlying bill by specifically requiring federal agencies report to general any large public building or federally leased spaces with a capacity of 500 or more and a utilization rate below 20% in the reporting period on the underlying bill. my amendment excludes vacant office building. any large buildingr federally leased space identified would be forwarded to the relevant inspector general to conduct a investigation to discover if there is fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement. it's simple, if a building meant for more than 500 people is being utilized less than 20% the inspector general must investigate whether there is fraud, waste, and mis unfortunate that although many large federal office buildings are operang at frightening low res federal agencies are not taking steps to increase utilization rates. action to reduce their footprint or any meaningful movements to reduce the o

senator whitehouse: tnk you very much.sor myers, please proceed. >> thank you for the opportunity i'm the john g. mccullough professor of economics. i study the and abortion on economics. i'm not here as an activist. i'm presenting facts on the ways in which reproductive policy is economic policy.9r women ma half the of the labor force. their introduction into the work of whether or whenhe economy by to become a mother is the single largest e men and women's earnings track mostly right up through parenthood. but then there is a gap. even after the kids grow up and leave home. it is exacerbated by the lack ot of child care. of course none of this implies that women, men and society don't benefit greatly from children. i'm a mother of four. and for a time in my life i was the widowed single mother of preschool aged children. i have no doubt motherhood reduced my own emi productivity. i'm also sure it's entirely worth it for me and a decision i'd make again. but that's the point. the tradeoffs and decisions about whether and

i also want to say tnk y outread a plane crash and natural and f information that has helped us withou have held. if there's any additional information you can supply today on that plane crash? information is to move the wreckage to a secure location in tennessee we are beginning to look at thes to the family to adults and three children is very tragic. as we receive more information i will make sure you are informed on that paradox i appreciate that indeed we do extend those condolences and what a tragic situation. but as we discussed yesterday gratitude belongs on i-40 on that plane crashed i do want to add to the comments the ranking member in chairman cooperation d what we perceive as lack of cooperation on these investigations. i know that is a source of frustration for you and your team. it is forecause we hear some of that manufacturers are not as cooperative as they should be. the maintenance chairwoman i wot is not only the planes it's alsv trains. it is also other entities that are involved in the flying public. i do have one other question i wanted to ask you about. i have

. >> tnk you. senator kennedy of louisiana is recognized. >> chairman, thank you for being here. thank you for your services. i think i've said before, i believe you and your team probably saved the economy during the economic meltdown by establishing the currency swap line. so, i thank you for that. you gave an interview, mr. chairman, on february 4th this year to cbs, "60 minutes, i think," is that right? >> yep. >> i ordered a transcript of that hearing, which i read. i learned a lot reading it. you were asked a question about inflation. and you asked a question about prices declining. and here was your response. i'd like to quote you, if that's okay. quote, so the prices of some things will decline, others will go up. but we don't expect to see a decline in the overall price level. that doesn't tend to happen in economies, except in very negative circumstances. end quote. did i quote you accurately? >> i believe you did. >> okay. later in the interview, you were asked about the national debt. do you recall that? >> i don't actually, but i'm sure that's right. >> at least acco

general prelogar: tnk that argument would have more merit if there were't much water under the bridge in the fact that the court explained when or what identify this kind of delegation 40 years ago. petitioners talked about the reliance interest year and tried to diminish them. they did not tk about congress's own interests and relicen chevron. i think at this juncture, to say that we are going stch to default and make congress a discretions part would be to run to the detriment of congress's own reasonable expectations wh spect to drafting. it also does not account forhe category of cases where the language congress is using is infused with discretion. they agreed to terms like reasonable, appropriate, necessary. those are terms that require greater application to fill in the deil you cannot interpret them in a vaum so i don't derstand how this idea of making congress sait could function in that kind of world. and in the final thing i congress has said something very important here, thagcy shall administer the statue with regulations or adjudications ave the force of law. that is par

chief justice roberts: tnk you, mr. martinez. how much of an actual question on the ground is this? i saw some study that said we haven'relied on chevron for 14 years. and judge kethledge has itn -- he's been a judge for 10 years. he's never invoked chevron step two. you know, dg are used to deciding things, and when they get ou to doing it, they tend to think what they've come up with is not only the best answer, but it's the only answer. [laughter] and -- and i just wonder how often this comes up? martinez: i think it comes up a lot, your honor. and this court hasn't relied on chevron since 2016, but the lower courts sllave to apply it. and i think these two cases, the -- t t that you're going to hear this morning, sort of show what happens when -- when courts are applying ts doctrine because they're -- they're essentially gti to a point where they don't really have to figure out the best answer and they can just -- you know, instead of asking what does the statute mean, they can ask a differenthshold question, which is, is this statute ambiguous enough that -- that we should just

>> tnk we really do not have our own collectiono to be able to tell you withdrawal confidence with theministry reports we also talked to and largely rely on is really ocounterparts and the numbers e not that different. i think around the time of these estimates it was 30,000 roughly 31 was closer to it. theth idf was reporting about 28 or something like that. it is considerable and the challenges of course the health ministry is not differentiate between civilians and fighters inin that context so you are looking at a broad range of folks and again very challenging for us to independently corroborate effectively what the numbers are. issue that was mentioned a few weeks ago there was a concern about escalating tensions in absence of a cease-fire once ramadan started. particularly in the west bank is that a significant concern? >> it is i think the west bank remains pretty combustible place right now for a variety of reasons. i think the risks of a spillover of increased violence on the west bank in places like jordan and elsewhere in the region are also considerable. everybody's trying

. >> tnk you certainly should be concerned that, your honor.d say ishat the kind of regulation the ste of florida is imposing is one that is familiar to the law when you have businesses that have generally opened their facilities to all commerce and content, this is the w it has worked f cturies. if you were an innkeeper andpubt voluntarily chosen business inth court should proceed carefly but one thing that's important to epn mind is there is a first endment interest in ensuring that large, powerful businesses that have undertaken to host massive amounts of speech and ve the power to silence those spears■■@ the state has a first amendment interest in ensuring the free dse is there any aspecl media that you think is protected by the first amendment? yes, yo hor. i can certainly imagine a platform that wou bsubject to this law that wldndeed have first amendment rights. we point out in our briefhat if you had an internet platform, that indeed haa atform driven message was secve on the front democrats.com, i think it would be a different analysis