all good in triplicate. excuse me, but do you happen to work in the prosecutor's office?l, you say, the matter is serious, yes, very, let's go , let's go. “can you imagine, i’m completely confused , hello, i can’t even go , but that’s okay, but i understand, buevich, where is shvitsova, she’s gone to the city, but listen, a man, he needs advice, and zoya, maybe she can go to an appointment with prosecutor nikolai petrovich, do what they say, then you will report , she is the most important boss, yeah, the most important, please!" yeah, i'm not late, no, we're not finished yet, is there anything interesting? i can only confirm the fact of a fall from a great height. fractures forearms, hips, ruptures of internal organs, everything? no, not everything , hematoma of the parietal region. so, a blow? yes, with an object with a limited striking surface. it turns out that he received this blow before the fall, exactly, based on the location of the injuries on the upper and lower extremities, it is clear that... didn’t reassure me, well, well, that’s it , thank you, so, are you,

was hired by , not once does it reference the fact the at&t records commonly have duplicate and triplicate entries. that is something commonly seen and something that is seen in these records and that is something that leads to the incorrect number of times it has been alleged that miss willis and mr. wade were in communication through text and voice mail. that number does not prove anything, that anybody is in a relationship, it proves they were in communication with each other and your owner can use your own life experience as it relates to people you work with or friends that you are close with and the number of times you make calls to any of those people. i can submit to the court i have a friend i have been friends with for 15 years and she worked in the office previously with me and based on our professional and personal relationship, the friendship we had and still h have, we talk 30 times a day. that is not -- that does not mean we are in a relationship. the assertion that the number of times miss willis and mr. wade have spoken to each other whether through text message or phone,

were hired, that not once did it reference the fact that at&t records commonly have duplicate and triplicatething that is commonly seen. that is something that is seen in these records. that is something that leads to the incorrect number of times that's been alleged that ms. willis and mr. wade were in communication through text and voicemail. i would submit to the court that that number doesn't prove anything again.■ ■■adoesn't prove that anybody in a relationship. it proves that they were in communication with each other. i think your honor can use your own life experience as it relates to people you work with our friends that you are close with and the number of times that calls to any of those people. i can submit to the court that i have a friend who i have been friends with for 15 years and she worked in the office previously with me. based on our professional relationipndship that we had and still have, that we talked 30 times a day. that doesn't mean we are in a relationship. so the assertion that the number of times that ms. willis had mr. wade spoken to each other, whether through

sadow is that not once does it reference the fact at&t records commonly have dub pla kit and triplicate duplicates and seen in these records. that is something that leads to the incorrect number of times that it's been alleged that ms. willis and mr. wade were in communication through text and voicemail. i also submit to the court that that number doesn't prove anything, again. doesn't prove that anybody's in a relationship. it proves that they were in communication with each other and i think your honor can use your own life experience as it relates to people you work with or friends that you are close with and the number of times that you make calls to any of those people. i can submit to the court that i have a friend who i've been friends with for 15 years and she worked in the office previously with me, and based on our professional relationship and our personal relationship the friendship that we had and still have, that we talk -- 30 times a day. that doesn't mean we're in a relationship. so the assertion that the number of times that ms. willis and mr. wade had spoke ton each ot

is that not once does it reference the fact that at&t records commonly have duplicate and triplicate entries within the call detail records that is something that is commonly seen and that is something that has seen in these records. and that is something that leads to the incorrect number of times that has been alleged, that ms willis and mr. wade were in communication through texts and voicemails. and i'd also some the court that that number doesn't prove anything again, doesn't prove that anybody's in a relationship it proves that they were in communication with each other and i think, your honor, can use your own life experience as it relates to people you work with or friends that you are close with. and the nhl number of times that you make calls to any of those people. i can submit to the court that i have a friend who i have been friends with for 15 years and she worked in the office previously with me. and based on our professional relationship and our personal relationship, the friendship that we had had and still have that. we talk 30 times a day so there's that doesn't me

everything was in paper with carbon copy in triplicate.sically i would go through these in a day that's about a day's worthl phone and take pho. i didn't have time to read documents, mostly like i had a limited time in the archive, so of just snapping pictures. and then, as i said, the pandemic happened and shut everything down. adam would let me know every now and he'd say, hey, we'repe up next tuesday. you want to come over? and i was like, let's do it. and that's how i got onto this story. the story that begins, as i said, of truman walking out of his apartment a cold day in 1941. he just won his second, narrowly won reelection to his second term in the senate. and on that day, he was about as much of a nobody in washington as the united state senator can possibly be. now, here he is around that time, he'd been in the senate for six years. he'd done almost of note at that time, there was no major piece of legislation that had his name on it. no. truman this or truman that. he had there quietly and learned and, watched, kept his mouth sh