in russian history of the 19th century there were two pavlovichs. first alexander pavlovich, alexandervich, nicholas i, i would call them, you know, two political fluxes, on opposite sides, nikolai pavlovich was forced from the very first during the days of his reign, he prioritized internal affairs; this period, the period of the reign of alexander i, was such a peak of authority. russia in the international arena. yes, under alexander, according to pushkin from the tenth chapter of evgeniy anegin, we found ourselves in paris, and the russian tsar became the king of kings. hello, this is a story. grandmother catherine, who once said that i would get along very well, that in athens, that in sparta, somewhere two, two completely different poles, and the same thing happened with alexander pavlovich in his young years, he could spend the whole day in gatchina, doing, so to speak, marching and military affairs with his father, as for upbringing, you and i remember who raised him, this is the republican lagar. ekaterina alekseevna and, accordingly , and in childhood and then in youth betwee

in russian history of the 19th century there were two pavlovichs, first alexander pavlovich alexanderfferent sides, and nikolai pavlovich was forced from the very first days of his reign to deal primarily with internal affairs, this period, period the reign of alexander i is the peak of russia’s authority in the international arena. yes, under alexander, according to pushkin from the tenth chapter of eugene onegin, we found ourselves in paris, and the russian tsar was the king of kings. hello, this is a historical podcast russia-west on the swing of history. pyotr romanov and sergei solovyov are with you, we are talking today about alexander i. historians at the end of the reign of alexander pavlovich, and the reign is a quarter of a century from 1801 to 1800. engaged, so to speak, in marching and military affairs together with his father, as for education, then you and i remember who raised him, this is the republican lagarb, swiss, yes, who later became the head of republican switzerland, well, klyuchevsky was ironic about this, he said that lagarb is such a talkative liberal book,

because impostors, in this case, it turned out, it turned out, there were a lot of impostors of alexander pavloviches, fixed themselves, sometimes, out of drunkenness, they passed themselves off as the tsar, well, it happened, sometimes, like fyodor kuzmich , they gave more solid grounds for rumors, but of course these are all rumors, and of course a serious historian here should say that alexander really died, the conclusion can be said, perhaps, as follows, simply stating: that for many years russia was perhaps the main player in the international arena in europe, alexander i enjoyed enormous authority for a very long time, but since he did not deal with internal affairs, russia was deprived of a constitution and elementary freedoms. reforms did not gradually lag behind, the principles of the sacred union did not justify themselves, nicholas was already forced to renounce them, there was an uprising of the decembrists demanding these... forms, eh, but it was prepared not so much by the rebels themselves, but, in general, by politics , late politics alexander i. and here one more thing needs to be

personal conflict with alexander, personal , i don’t think that people know everything about alexander pavlovichcifically street life in this case, roads, yes, he could also hate kutuzov, because he burned moscow and, in general , annoyed him a lot and outwitted him , sent him along another road on the way back, kutuzov, personally, personally, we check personally kutuzov, kutuzov is coming, to beat the french, yes, we remember this song, so, there is one line left, 49 frosts, kutuzov, smolensk to moscow, that it’s good for three months in france, we check the distance. no, we don’t have distance yet, it’s frosty, it’s coming, they ’re resisting it, the food isn’t very tasty, it’s time maybe everything was delayed, spent like this, what else might he not like, he needs something just different. and they burned moscow, set moscow on fire, he might not have liked it, it’s not clear who burned it, either the french themselves, or not, well, there in russia, you can read the question again, what do you think napoleon might not have liked in russia, of course, he might not like, hello, what do they l

alexander alexandrovich fedorov, rector of the kant baltic state university, alexey pavlovich kozyrevt kant, his life and teachings. actually, dear friends, i would like to. art is open to the viewer, on the one hand the verse is very aphoristic, sometimes very simple and clear, sometimes so complex that thought stops and stumbles, but at the same time it gives pleasure, you need to go back and think again, therefore if we briefly answer mamardashili’s challenge, it will turn out like this: kant is complexity that strives for understanding, excellent, asi balovich. what will moscow university say? well, reading any philosophical text, if it is real philosophy, requires certain efforts, overcoming screens, as mamardashvili said, when we step over the incomprehensible and through our own inertia, because we live in the world of feelings, and kant with this he begins his critique of pure reason, with transcendental aesthetics, then there is how the world... the topic of differences between art and science is raised, science strives for the objective, art is all a subjective world, yes, p

alexander. alexandrovich fedorov, alexey pavlovich kozarev, i’m vladimir ligoida, we continue. wedenburg, yes, if again, this is true, what i read, four copies of it are being sold, one gets to the edge, he not only reads it all, this huge book, but also writes, i don’t know, one might say, a devastating text on this matter, here is alexey pavlovich, but how does this characterize kant, what do you think, this action? well, swedenburg is a spiritual seer, for him, after all, religion is within the limits of reason alone, yes, that is, he tried to treat things, let’s say, related to spiritual tradition, as a representative of the era of enlightenment, we must not forget that, after all, when we talk enlightenment is not only rosso, not only diderot, not only walter, but also emmanuel kant, he says what enlightenment is, from the famous text, it’s more mature. this is when a person from youth moved into adulthood learned to think with the help of his mind, to be responsible for his actions, in this regard, who to read, who to criticize, how to relate to the thoughts of another pe

pavlovich. dear alexander grigorievich, dear presidium, dear delegates and invitees.man will largely depend the result of work from the belarusian people's assembly. i am convinced that it should be. a very efficient person, this should be a person who will lend a shoulder to alexander grigorievich, who will carry this difficult burden and guide all of us in the right direction of work. of course, this must be a patriot of our country, and a person who has extensive organizational experience and a high professional. applause knows this man, however, let me say a few words about his biography: alexander nikolaevich was born in 1959 in a village, in the varshansky district, vitebsk region. after graduating from the vitebsk medical institute in 1982, at that time, he worked his way up from a graduate student to the rector of this institute. subsequently, during his work as rector, this institute became a university. over the years of work, this is 8 years as rector, the university staff is still grateful to this man for what was done during these years to develop the mat

another thing is that... will they hear you speak, with peredny pavlovich, in two competing centers, but this idea, the idea not alexandera of ​​beijing, the idea of ​​other people, where the pope can be added here, who says that some kind of outcome is possible, not military, but the end of the war? i don’t think that these are just words, vladimirevich, i think that people, including even if there are few of them... who live on today’s territory of ukraine, think about this, because the idea is something, the opposite idea, here’s the thing, what result do the ukrainian authorities want, what? because of zelensky’s statements, i am closely following the information field of ukraine, i i haven’t heard for a long time, i haven’t heard the phrase for a long time: we must return to the borders of the ninety-first year, i haven’t heard this phrase for a long time, but if the goal is different: you need to recruit people, send them to the front, where to recruit them from, yes you can, you can by force, maybe they will do so, but the motivation of these people, if you, if you were forced to fight, how will you fight, and man

another thing is that... do they hear you speak , with peredny pavlovich, in two competing centers, but this idea, the idea not of alexanderthe idea of ​​other people, the pope can also be added here, which suggests that some kind of outcome is possible, not military , and the ending war, i don’t think that these are just words, vladimir, i think that people, including even if there are few of them... from america, from the west, which is only waiting to dismember russia, conquer its mineral resources, enslave its people , it has always been this way, napoleon, hitler, yes, or this is how it goes, but what are we saying, we americans say, inflict a strategic defeat on russia, and what is this, tell me, what is it for and what will it give to ukraine, tell me me, why should some guy in the dawn. strength to risk your life, the family must risk their lives, for which, for america to say, we must inflict a strategic defeat on russia, what ukraine wants from this, that this will save it, this will improve its strategic position, improve its way of life, this will strengthen the people's wealth, increase, for people to use this

the city of leninsk, sushkov, vitaly pavlovich and the head of the administration. help our program, yes, i’m right, sasha, at your request, you turned to alexanderour business, but as i understand, sasha, now the problem is with the head of zaks, yes, who flatly refuses to provide any... or data, yes, we arrived at the zaks department, the boss came out and said that she had no words for her. not the head of administration, nor the mayor of the city and said that let representatives of law enforcement agencies contact us, we hope that they will contact them and we will receive at least some data. but besides the story of natalie, whom we are following, of course there were a huge number of calls that became victims of nadezhda fratti, let's remind everyone who this woman is, briefly, attention, fratti, nadezhda fedorovna. date of birth november 1 , 1953, had a criminal record under article 291 , part two of the criminal code of the russian federation. giving a bribe to an official . on january 30, 2001, the prosecutor's office of the volgograd region opened a criminal case case on the fact of illegal adoption of russian children by foreigners. t

pavlovich, senior police lieutenant, freelance agency employee. ask, hidden camera agency. when i arrived, he didn’t meet me, he disappeared somewhere , wait, arina, and you and alexanderleft for moscow, and then he promised to meet me at the station, in fact, that’s all i was waiting for, but i arrived, and he disappeared somewhere, and i called him , i called, his phone number is not from... it seems to me that sasha simply took advantage of your gullibility? no, the police told me the same thing, but i couldn’t do that to sasha. arin, please calm down, remember at least something. describe what it looks like. well, let me show you a photo, right? here i have it with me phone. we have a photo and a phone number, try it, a photo in black glasses, the phone is turned off, please, my intuition tells me that something really happened there, just some kind of female solidarity at the level of intuition. mikhailch, okay, let’s try to find yours, thank you, otherwise... they laughed at me and i didn’t even hope, i’m so glad, it’s too early to rejoice, we’ll keep in touch with you, okay, i ’ll go, yes, yes, thank you very much, thank you, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye, ol, no ne