so, oleksandr pavlichenko, the law enforcer, appears before us again, thank you, mr. oleksandr. now we, we understood that it is impossible to do perfectly, because there is nothing perfect in the world, except our conversation with you, definitely, our conversation, ours with you is the only one in the world. ideal, that is, but it was possible in advance, that is , the system is simply not ready, but when we now showed these crowds of people near the consulates in europe, i understand that... simply the ministry of foreign affairs, the consular departments were simply not ready, and it was as unexpected for them as it was for all the people standing in the queues, i understand correctly that here it was possible to expand the situation in such a way that there would be gradualism and that there would not be that crowd and those inconveniences, the first issue is communication, the situation is not that it is under-communicated, it is just... done in such a way that the purpose of the actions on the part becomes unclear in general state authorities, well, first of all, it is th

oleksandrov, i have, in short, i am surrounded by oleksandr, and he is added to this environment oleksandr pavlichenkoive, executive director, i apologize, ukrainian hertsinsk union for human rights, good health, mr. oleksandr, good health, mr. mykola and all the viewers, look, this thing in the gas happened behind my back, i am told that i'm not looking, because it's somehow inconvenient to turn my back, gaiskyi. and there they gathered in this town, it is very small, 44 states and out of 57 44 supported a special tribunal for the russian federation, and what kind of a special tribunal is this, because we are so proud, happy and say: hooray, hooray, there will be a special tribunal, and what kind of tribunal is it, what mandate does it have, is the mandate created, what are its powers, what it can, what it cannot, and so on and so forth. these are the beautiful words of the special tribunal, because everyone remembers the nurberg tribunal and if they understand what it is about, but it was a specific tribunal in nurberg as well, and as i understand it, now it is also specific, and what is the modern

oleksandr pavlichenko, executive director of the ukrainian helsinki union for human rights, has alreadyd our broadcast. alexander, good evening. good evening, congratulations. as a human rights activist, i have a short and simple question: is the decision to temporarily suspend consular services abroad a violation of human rights or not? yes, because it is an illegal act, it has no legal effect grounds, and in fact, this is the same action as border guards stopped men. what wines were released, even those who had certain permits for leaving, they simply had, so to speak, a separate order to try to restrain the departure of men abroad, accordingly, this is exactly what the ministry of foreign affairs is trying to do, but with regard to men who have gone abroad, actually denying them the provision of consular services, which some of them have already paid for, because those who came to the dp yesterday, document after document, received... the answer that due to technical reasons they cannot receive the ordered service. and when the law enters into force on may 18, and it will be written

oleksandr pavlichenko, executive director of the ukrainian helsinki union for human rights, was in touch with us, now we go to turkey, to our neighbor, we have bad neighbors, average and good, turkey some think that it is not a very good neighbor, i think that it is a good neighbor, and we are from russia, now to turkey, russia is definitely the worst neighbor , evgenia haber, senior analyst - i'm not used to it, you see how old i am already, but i really like to talk about turkey, because i love this country very much, and now my first question, defeat, well, how, well, somehow i see that the international press writes about the defeat of erdogan's party. simple, and some write that it is not this is such a terrible defeat, others write, well , just a defeat, this is the end of erdogan’s ideas, this, it is as if turkish society has already eaten, eaten erdogan’s ideas, and even now there is no return to them, is it so temporary, i also ask , because there is his relative barikhtar, who supplies excellent props... for killing russians and war, can this barikhtar take over the leadership